It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
above link
The aircraft may have unmanned air-to-air and bombing capabilities with the eventual ability to launch nuclear warheads. It is anticipated that it will be the first aircraft to integrate a software based stealth and survival technology with an advanced stealth airframe design.
The maiden flight of the system was successfully completed in December 2002. The Taifun system is scheduled to enter service with the German Army in 2006. 13 systems with more than 936 air vehicles will be delivered by 2011.
Originally posted by sardion2000
I like the look of it, looks very deadly. Much better lines then any of the UCAV's I've seen the USAF testing.
Originally posted by Murcielago
Hannah - While yes...nearly any bomber could pack a nuclear punch, nations dont do it because it looks bad, I'm wondering if they are seriously looking into having this be nuclear or not.
Also, I wasn't aware of the TAIFUN, not suprises considering how many various types of Unmanned aircraft are being built.
However it (Taifun) appears to need rockets to get off the ground and can only carry a single munition, and the munition is only 44 lbs. which is only enough to take on a armored vehicle...and not a building. I would classify it as a UCAV...but borderline.
What intreged me was not only nuclear, but that it could handle both Air-to-Air, as well as Air-to-Ground, I dont believe any other unmanned aircraft can do this, nor have I seen any plans for the USAF to have a Unmanned Fighter/Bomber.
Originally posted by Hannah
whether it ( the french UCAV ) looks "good" or not is discussible, the US have their b-52, b-1, b-2 and i guess a still classified successor of the b-2, to launch a massive nuclear strike on any country on this planet, it's only logical that other countries do the same, and we (EU and US) are still allies, despite what some posts/threads on this board want to imply.
in my opinion it's more likely to see the french and german UCAV's fly in formation with b-2 + US UCAVS than seeing them fighting each other.
Originally posted by Daedalus3
And as for the taifun.. its propeller driven! ..
ahem .. sorry..
Good plane all in all except for stealth features..
[edit on 29-4-2005 by Daedalus3]
The relatively small air vehicle - wing span 2.3 m, length 2.1 m, height 1.1 m - is built with multi-spectral stealth material. Low observability gives the possibility to penetrate far into the enemy territory without being detected or destroyed.
Originally posted by sardion2000
skippytjc, your point? It's how the Aviation Industry works isn't it? Everyone plays follow the leader(s) (in this case and time period it's the USA)
Imitation is the best form of flattery.
I don't see the french/germans helping the US in any scenario unless its backed by a UN mandate.. Thats for sure..
And as for the taifun.. its propeller driven!
Originally posted by WestPoint23
I don't see the french/germans helping the US in any scenario unless its backed by a UN mandate.. Thats for sure..
Why the French need UCAVs and expensive weapon systems is beyond me when is the last time they fought in a war? And they will probably surrender before they use any of their weapons anyway so...