It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Originally posted by skippytjc
I wont describe myself as a tough guy, but they better prey this never happens to me or my family.
I have seen video's of this, and moslty they prey on people who obviously cannot deffend themselves, or when they have advantage of numbers.
This btw, is the prime reason we need cameras everywhere. The polics cannot react in tim to this sort of crime, so our only hope is to catch them on video.
Originally posted by Derek Trance
I know I'd jump on the one that slapped me and crush his face as best I could before the others kicked my ass...but some people get intimidated by odds.
Originally posted by skippytjc
The polics cannot react in tim to this sort of crime, so our only hope is to catch them on video.
Originally posted by thematrix
Thats me, with that head comes a 6'2" body weighing in at 90 Kilo's, I'm well trained and strong.
Originally posted by thematrix
15 passengers and these 2 idiots joined me to the police station in the brussels North trainstation and my guess is they'll never do it again.
What bothered me most about this is that none of the passengers reacted untill I slapped the cufs on this guy.
Are people to scared or just to selfish to stop people from doing stuff like this?
en.wikipedia.org...
The bystander effect (also known as bystander apathy) is a psychological phenomenon where persons are less likely to intervene in an emergency situation when others are present than when they are alone.
Solitary individuals will typically intervene if another person is in need of help: this is known as bystander intervention. However, researchers were surprised to find that help is less likely to be given if more people are present. In some situations, a large group of bystanders may fail to help a person who obviously needs help. An example which shocked many people is the Kitty Genovese case. Kitty Genovese was stabbed to death in 1964 by a mentally ill man. The murder took place over a period of about thirty minutes, during which at least 38 alleged "witnesses" failed to help the victim. For this reason, the name Genovese syndrome or Genovese effect was used to describe the phenomenon at the time. The death of Deletha Word in 1995 after witnesses failed to thwart her attackers, as well as the James Bulger murder case, may have been other well-publicized cases of the effect.
A 1968 study by John Darley and Bibb Latané first demonstrated the bystander effect in the laboratory. The most common explanation is that, with others present, observers all assume that someone else is going to intervene and so they each individually refrain from doing so. This is an example of how diffusion of responsibility leads to social loafing. People may also assume that other bystanders may be more qualified to help, such as being a doctor or police officer, and their intervention would thus be unneeded. People may also fear "losing face" in front of the other bystanders, being superseded by a "superior" helper, or offering unwanted assistance. Another explanation is that bystanders monitor the reactions of other people in an emergency situation to see if others think that it is necessary to intervene. Since others are doing exactly the same, everyone concludes from the inaction of others that other people do not think that help is needed. This is an example of pluralistic ignorance and social proof.
A victim may be able to counter the bystander effect by picking a specific person in the crowd to appeal to for help rather than appealing to the larger group generally. This places all responsibility on that specific person, instead of allowing it to diffuse; it counters pluralistic ignorance by showing that all bystanders are indeed interested in helping; and it kicks in social proof when one or more of the crowd steps in to assist.
Originally posted by skippytjc This is EXACTLY the type of crime cameras help prevent.
I just thought of a great "prank" to do pull on an unsuspecting crowd.....all I need is a high powered rifle, ammo and a tower. Man won't it be funny? This is social insanity! If you think about it, there is very little difference between slapping the unsuspecting or shooting them. It's violence pure and simple.
Originally posted by Lysergic
ah the joy of owning guns.
Originally posted by benevolent tyrant
I just thought of a great "prank" to do pull on an unsuspecting crowd.....all I need is a high powered rifle, ammo and a tower. Man won't it be funny? This is social insanity! If you think about it, there is very little difference between slapping the unsuspecting or shooting them. It's violence pure and simple.
Originally posted by Lysergic
ah the joy of owning guns.
Originally posted by Veltro
If someone did this to me, my first instinct and one I would act on would be to punch the slapper directly in the face. I was taught from childhood how to make sure to break an attackers nose with the first punch.
I wonder who the police would arrest?? I've seen all sorts of perversions spring up with these stupid camera and video phones.
Sick. [/quote You asked the pertinent question, "who would the cops arrest"? Well, in this unusual age when children and teenagers seem to have more protection under the law than adults, I'm almost certain that the adult victim of such a slap attack would be arrested if he punched out the little ***holes.....even if the police had a video tape of the little perps launching the attack. After all, we have to protect the little impish darlings even if they really are spoiled rotten little brats. My oh my, what is the world coming to?
Originally posted by thematrix
Are people to scared or just to selfish to stop people from doing stuff like this?
[edit on 28-4-2005 by thematrix]