It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
You still haven't answered on why it is "unscientific" to validate radiometric dating with other dating systems.
What is your answer to that?
AND for the record....I DONT KNOW HOW WE GOT HERE.
Science cant answer that and neither can religion, so drop it.
Originally posted by Rock Hunter
Jake: So just to clarify you are basically saying that you don't believe the earth is billions of years old? From the look of it that is what you are saying.
This is the basis for uniformitarianism. It has been proven incapable. Every time something needs to be explained, catasrophism is employed. What happened to dino? Asteroid.
One early emminent geologist named James Hutton made a statement "the present is the key to the past". The basic essence of this is that he realised that looking at current proceses and their rates, that it was impossible for these to occur in under 6000 years, and therefore the earth had to be a great deal older then had been proposed.
I think you should leave the science to people who have actually been trained and do this stuff everyday.
Originally posted by jake1997
It has been proven incapable
What happened to dino? Asteroid
Sort of. I will not say that it 'is not' as if it were fact. I will say that I believe it is young, because of my faith.
No.
Question everything!
That is how you deny ignorance
Also, lets face it, geologists and associated scientists don't have any interest in proping up some falshood that the world is very old. No one particularly cares, and if there was evidence out there that could, say, demonstrate that the world is in fact 6,000 years old, or anything radical like that, there'd be a rush to publish it, not a cover up. That sort of thing would instantly make someone's career.
Rock Hunter, pretend for a week to be a believer at school. Insist that the tests are flawed and that the geological evidence is from the flood.
Make sure that everyone knows your view. Keep a straight face.
Watch the way people treat your work after that.
[edit on 2-5-2005 by jake1997]
Originally posted by lucas_900
One scientist saying "yar, umm the earth is billions of years old. I know this because i tested some rocks" isn't going to convince the rest. Plenty of independent studies would have been carried out to help provide evidence for the theory, each with different groups of scientists. Science isnt like a rumor - you cant just start it and let it grow and people will believe it, the "rumor" will be check, tested and then check and tested again by someone else and so on.
Originally posted by Rock Hunter
Rock Hunter, pretend for a week to be a believer at school. Insist that the tests are flawed and that the geological evidence is from the flood.
Make sure that everyone knows your view. Keep a straight face.
Watch the way people treat your work after that.
[edit on 2-5-2005 by jake1997]
Do you mean that your at school and this is what happened to you??
As Firstly I'm not at School, I'm doing my doctorate!!
You havn't read anything I have put on the previous post, the earth cannot be 6000 years old!! Read the last post!!
You
During my time as an undergrad.........
You havn't read anything I have put on the previous post, the earth cannot be 6000 years old!! Read the last post!!
do, I'm doing a Phd in Geology, and therefore virtually everything I do goes against your thinking. Dating methods in geology have stood up to great scrutiny by the geological community
Although I know it insults you faith, but from working in this field everyday and studying the processes involved in shaping the surface of the planet I really cannot believe that it came about after 6000 years.
When the ratio of metals in rocks is taken, scientists assume that the start of the rock...its "creation" had zero daughter element. They take the current ratio, and the current rate of decay, and announce that the rock is X amount of years old.
This is not scientific at all. This is 7th grade lab work.
How many times do we have to go over this. As geologists we do not set out to "make long dates" as you summise. If evidence came to the contary that the earth was 6000 years old, then I would publish it straight away. This would make my career!!!
Originally posted by jake1997
Double blind test.
The same standard as the medical community. Put the dating methods up against a double blind test and then Im with you 1000 %.