Bigfoot Pics from 1980 near Spokane, Washington

I saw this on the coast to coast site and figured I would post it to get some other people opinions.
I cant say for sure these are even legit pictures. They do remind me alot of the patterson bigfoot costume. Hate to say but I does kinda look like a man in a suit.
Anyone share any insight to these pics?

www.coasttocoastam.com...


Tom Biscardi of the Great American Bigfoot Research Organization has made available some photos taken by their group.

The first image, which shows Bigfoot walking, was taken in 1980 near Spokane, Washington. Biscardi reported that the creature was fired on to keep it at bay, as it was coming towards the group.

The three images below that, two of which show a creature showering, were taken in 1981 in Beaver Swamp, California.












[edit on 22-4-2005 by enrage]

in photo #2 bigfoot is sporting quite the package. that's a first. usually the makers of these costumes leave the genitalia off.

Originally posted by Crakeur
in photo #2 bigfoot is sporting quite the package. that's a first. usually the makers of these costumes leave the genitalia off.

I don't even know what to say! If he was a porn star, he'd be Johnny Wad.

In all seriousness though, you are correct about that. He's pretty intimidating.......................................in more ways than one.

Peace

He should meet the Paterson bigfoot, with her ample breasts and his huge wang they'd be a match made in heaven

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Burgess]

Actually look how much the top picture looks like the Paterson big foot.

To me that suggest that either they used the same suit or Big Foots just happens to look like that.

I'm going for the second one

Also if you want a good read check out the sighting database over at

www.bfro.net

It's got a shed load in, well worth the read even if you don’t think big foot exists

here's a better link

www.bfro.net...

*edit to add extra link

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Burgess]

The only thing I find a little odd about these pictures is the fact that I've never seen them before now, and they were taken in '81.

I'm trying to understand the story that comes with them. The Sasquatch started charging these guys, then they fired at him, then he started taking a shower???????

BTW, I happen to believe that the Patterson footage is real.

Peace

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Dr Love]

Originally posted by Dr LoveThe Sasquatch started charging these guys, then they fired at him, then he started taking a shower?

that's actually a very common behavior among mythological creatures. Aliens tend to stop and pose for photos before renewing their assaults, chupacabra's like to dangle menacingly from tree limbs, ghosts pause to look eerie in reflections.

don't you read anything on this site?

Originally posted by Dr Love
The only thing I find a little odd about these pictures is the fact that I've never seen them before now, and they were taken in '81.

I'm trying to understand the story that comes with them. The Sasquatch started charging these guys, then they fired at him, then he started taking a shower???????

BTW, I happen to believe that the Patterson footage is real.

Peace

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Dr Love]

no.
the bigfoot in the 1st picture was fired upon in california. the bigfoot in the rest of the pics was the one that took a shower in washington, no shots were fired.

[edit on 22-4-2005 by enrage]

You're right....................MY BAD!!

I was in a state of confusion because of the 'package' picture, but I still have never seen any of these pictures before today.

Peace

Does anyone else think that creature is just a little too black? It seems almost a synthetic color of black and a little too brilliant to be on that of a creature that is supposed to be outside year round. I've seen many pictures of black bears and there color isn't nearly as brilliant as that.

And have you guys seen This NEW Report that purportedly shows brand new footage of a sasquatch type creature?

RR

I wonder why we haven't been able to catch a glimpse of that new video yet? I'm foaming at the mouth. It makes you wonder what's being done with it.

Peace

I saw a new report yesterday, of which I lost the link to, that said the owner of the footage is now shopping it around so he's definately trying to make a buck which kind of raises the skeptic in me but he also said that he may just do away with it because the stress of dealing with all the publicity, so I guess we'll just have to wait and see.

Originally posted by RR
...but he also said that he may just do away with it because the stress of dealing with all the publicity...

If it was a real sasquatch, and certain people know that it's real and know it will open up a Pandora's box when it hits the public, someone could be holding a gun to his head so to speak. That video, if real, is worth millions. Why would someone give it up because the stress got to be too much? If it was fake I would think that they would want to get it out to the public a.s.a.p. so they could show the public that it's B.S..

Peace

p.s. The lady said 7 to 8 ft. tall. That doesn't mean that a hoaxer couldn't find someone that tall, but a person that tall would definitely be harder to come by. I guess it could have been a couple of short people, one on top of the other.

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Dr Love]

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Dr Love]

Originally posted by RR
Does anyone else think that creature is just a little too black? It seems almost a synthetic color of black and a little too brilliant to be on that of a creature that is supposed to be outside year round. I've seen many pictures of black bears and there color isn't nearly as brilliant as that.

I checked out google and found a few pics. This is a good one

www.pgc.state.pa.us...

Thats pretty black, i agree tho the Bigfoot fur does look synthetic. But then if you look at the patterson footage so does that fur.

[edit on 22-4-2005 by Burgess]

I dunno about these pics, the first thing i notice in the first image is the knee. the "fur" appears to have pant like creases. The color does seem a bit shiny for a creature that should be dirty, in theory. Yes even bears are not that bright.

Look at the first image of it in the water splashing. dont the legs look way short for the body ? Look where its knees bend ! Pretty thin legs for such a beast.

i dunno what to think. its not that often that you get images of this sort to look at.

could be... maybe not... could be... maybe not..

Yes even bears are not that bright.

You got it wrong man. Hair and fur can be very shiny in the sun or any other light source. Try it yourself! Hairs on your arm shine under a light source don't they? High protein food helps that too. I one time dropped a raw egg on the floor and the cat ate it 2 days later his fur was really shiny and healthy looking. Not only that the Bigfoot is standing in water. His fur was probably wet up to his knees, sun reflects off wet surfaces too. Hair does group together wet like dredlocks giving a pantleg look. I'm not saying these pics are or aren't real, but they do look real. The long/large black gorilla like fingers, the stance, the arms are unsually long like a gorilla. Look at a large gorilla picture their legs are not huge at all, but their upper torso is. A full grown gorilla has enough strength to tear a mans head off. A beast like that would have no trouble ambushing a deer and killing it.

According to picture #2, bigfoot is now known as bigballs.

Pics look fake...and the amount of talk here about its package has me rolling....good eyes guys...

It's a man in a monkey suit. No, really, it is.

It looks like a guy in a monkey suit