The trial on kids was stopped

It appears some parents have put their kids up for a trial with the new MRna tech. Why would you risk their young lives? money I guess? but the safety signals were going off so they paused it. It seemed that lower raspatory infections were five times more common in the group that took the juice compared to the Placebo group.I hope that there is a follow up because the count stops when the trial ends.So it seems official that you are more likely to get an infection after the shot than if you never bothered in the first place.

a reply to: annonentity

Is beyond me to even think that a parent will give away their own child for experimentations to pharm, with the terrible record of deceptions they have.

This like selling your child for the highest bid, just for money, is just despicable and should be considered child endangerment and abuse.

There are still a lot of people who believe the vaccines saved lives and refuse to achknowledge that the official stastics showed those who received two Covid vaccines were 5 times more likely to get Covid. They want to believe in the vaccine; I'm guessing it's hot something to do with denying their gullibility for being taken for fools. That, or they really do belive mRNA vaccines really work, despite all of the evidence to the contrary.

Biden just passed legislation that Big Pharma can't be held accountable for thier failed vaccine and the harm it's caused until 2029. Why would he do that if they were so safe and effective?

A friend of my BIL just spent two weeks in the hospital after a serious adverse reaction from his last mRNA booster. Within 24 hours he was fighting for his life with bloodclots attacking all of his organs.
He was finally released from the hospital but is far from well. He believed in the vaccine and boosters because he never had a problem....until he did.

Our bodies are overrun with toxins frrom the environment, food chain and things like PFAS; maybe the mRNA vaccine is just the straw that broke the camal's back.

It would be interesting to know how many people with pre-existing conditions suffered adverse reactions as opposed to those who didn't. I'd be willing to bet those who didn't is a very small number.

I don't think parents volunteering their children for these trials were told the whole truth and nothing but. I think they were coherced with false reassurances of how much better of their children would be if they did receive the extra 'help' on offer and may have been emotionally blackmailed into thinking they were acting in their child's best interests.

a reply to: nugget1

The thing that bothers me the most, is that while they get immunity from killing people from their vaccine, we can be forced to get their poison.

And big pharma wants mandatory vaccines on school age children.

a reply to: nugget1

I think you mean unknown pre-existing condition. Almost any adverse reaction might be blamed on a pre-existing condition. It can be hard to prove you did not have a condition before it showed up after the shot.

Well, if you stimulate the body to fight one kind of disease strongly, it might ignore other threats that it senses are not as much of a threat. I was concerned that by stimulating it strongly to fight covid with the mRNA vaccome, it might ignore cancer cells initially. I have not found any confirmation of my hypothesis, but then again, the head people who pushed that vaccine wouldn't tell us or fund any research to evaluate if what I think is possible is real.

CYA runs those agencies it seem, same with politics.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: nugget1

I think you mean unknown pre-existing condition. Almost any adverse reaction might be blamed on a pre-existing condition. It can be hard to prove you did not have a condition before it showed up after the shot.

No, I don't. A lot of people seemed to have gotten the vaccine without any serious reaction; those people should be compared to ones known to have a pre-existing condituon, like diabetes, obesity, asthma, etc. If they make up the greatest number of people that had adverse reactions it would prove that the vaccine was too much of an assault on their immune system to deal with.

If adverse reactions are to be found in amajority of people with known pre-existing condition then they should have stopped vaccinating those people very early on. In retrospect, it would be very interesting to know how many deaths/long term injuries were among the immune compromised and exclude them from any mRNA mass vaccination efforts going forward.

a reply to: nugget1

I still have family members who swear by the COVID shot. All of my immediate family had the full protocol, including me. We have all had COVID at least two times. My wife is the only one of us out of 9 adults that only got a mild case of COVID once.

I will not take another mRNA shot, period.

a reply to: annonentity

Adding Links from the description area...that he covers

Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee December 12, 2024 Meeting Announcement - LINK
Entire briefing document - LINK
Pediatric RSV vaccine trial enrollment on hold in US, VRBPAC says - LINK

For what covid?

let someone experiment on your child because they are the lowest at risk age group to this modified flu.

WTF is wrong with people.

a reply to: fos613

The whole point of getting the shot is not to get the condition. Any salesman will say if you got the condition then if you had the shot it wouldn't have been so bad.

a reply to: annonentity

They had time to improve delivery of the mRNA gene therapy - to make it safer, more targeted. Yet these still made more kids sick with the very thing they’re vaccinating against than in the groups in the placebo… What does that tell us about the covid vax and the probability that it caused more covid than it cured? These results make this virus causing scenario the most probable one

His inference that this boils down to contracts & money probably isn’t wrong

Oh it’s stopped?

In other words “it worked”.

And I don’t mean they’re vaccinated.

Ahem.

a reply to: nugget1

I see what you are meaning now. And I do agree with you.