It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
There was no social restrictions in 2011 - 2012 though. What's the double talk explanation? π
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
"A" for effort to draw automatic authoritative conclusions from false equivalencies. Now for your exit strategy. . . .
originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: WeMustCare
BS.
My wife was on the front lines of Covid from the word go. Anything that was a respiratory infection got labeled as Covid related because the hospitals were making so much money from those cases and not just from plain 'ol flu.
The flu didn't disappear it was just hidden .
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
Now all of a sudden YOU are asking questions?? lol lol π
A resident Branch Covidian.
originally posted by: berbofthegreen
a reply to: Boomer1947
Wow, ATS has a resident microbiologist.
Stick to that narrative you keep repeating and keep believing the lies. As far as that graphβ¦. Nothing to see here right?
originally posted by: BedevereTheWise
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
whatabout 2011-2012?
πΌ
Flu cases vary from year to year.
Sure he is, on everything he said? Right?π€£
originally posted by: doctordark
Oh Krusty, stay in your lane on this one. Boomer is 100% correct, I have a Doctorate in Microbiology and he actually summarized it very well.
a reply to: KrustyKrab
originally posted by: BedevereTheWise
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: BedevereTheWise
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
You can argue if that was also the case for covid as well but it doesn't change that we would expect flu numbers to be incredibly low because of the preventative measures taken due to covid.
You keep telling yourself that lie. π€£
Sure much more believable that there is a massive conspiracy to say flu cases were actually covid.
How'bout COVID cases were actually Flu? π
Trick of the Century
I believe I already covered this.
Some cases may have been misidentified as covid but the typical number of annual flu cases doesn't explain what we saw covid. Also the number of positive flu cases from tests dramatically declined in 20/21.
originally posted by: doctordark
Oh Krusty, stay in your lane on this one. Boomer is 100% correct, I have a Doctorate in Microbiology and he actually summarized it very well.
a reply to: KrustyKrab
originally posted by: network dude
originally posted by: BedevereTheWise
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: BedevereTheWise
originally posted by: KrustyKrab
a reply to: BedevereTheWise
You can argue if that was also the case for covid as well but it doesn't change that we would expect flu numbers to be incredibly low because of the preventative measures taken due to covid.
You keep telling yourself that lie. π€£
Sure much more believable that there is a massive conspiracy to say flu cases were actually covid.
How'bout COVID cases were actually Flu? π
Trick of the Century
I believe I already covered this.
Some cases may have been misidentified as covid but the typical number of annual flu cases doesn't explain what we saw covid. Also the number of positive flu cases from tests dramatically declined in 20/21.
so you have proof they were testing for the flu during that time?