Is it just me or is it the MSM

originally posted by: theatreboy
They keep talking about the shooter as a male.

In the attached link, there is a screen shot of the shooter.

It really looks like a woman to me.

Your thoughts?

If you agree with me, why the deflection?

www.foxnews.com...

Probably another trans shooter, male to female, is still a male.
Men are most likely to commit shootings, where as women mostly use poisoning.

Check FBI data base, and see.

originally posted by: marg6043
a reply to: theatreboy

Maybe is a transgender and he is mad because the insurance denied gender surgery for him.

My thoughts exactly .....

Define woman 😂 jokes.

a reply to: theatreboy

a reply to: theatreboy

Appears to be male in my opinion... A woman's mind does not think to write a message on the bullet casings - That is for sure man-think

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Indeed, dead cats are an ever more utilised ploy, as our civilisation descends into farce. So, what exactly is this one designed to distract us from?

a reply to: McGinty

Syria is collapsing, the rebel army is almost nearing the Damascus, some speculations that the leader of Syria has fleet the country, but they are denying the allegations.

Trump said that is an internal issue and US should not be involved.

Soo there you have it, it could be another war on top of all the conflicts the new administration is going inherit.

a reply to: baddmove

Different everything. Someone's trying obfuscate the facts with some old fashioned BS. It just seems there might be some efforts by some higher-ups to confuse the truth.

a reply to: theatreboy

It's America........it's probably either/or.

a reply to: marg6043

Syria’s a huge story; Putin’s Assad unthroned, plus its ex-Al Qaeda replacing him.

But I’m not sure what keeping it out of the headlines achieves. In the U.K. it’s been today’s top story. So I agree if it’s not being talked about in US msm that wld indeed be odd

a reply to: theatreboy

Interesting how you obsess over the "murderer" than research the motive as to why, because it is implicated that the reason why is because UHG was being dip#s & had a track-record of controversies ranging from lawsuits to fines and whatnot, and more generally, the holistic function of the UHG as apart of the American healthcare/health-insurance system and its contributions to continuing the lifespan of it. This system relies on the principle of privatization, i.e the transfer of a property from the public sector, and has continually pushed for this principle in terms of lobbying and political spin. Healthcare is apart of the public sector, because it is a public service, of which the term "public service" is any service of which accommodates to the specific needs of a community, for which healthcare fits into this definition, and as such shall not be privatized in any way whatsoever.

a reply to: i664k

That is one aspect that is most certainly
not being talked about in the legacy media.

It is the massive elephant in the room.

United Health posted a 90Billion profit
in the last 12 months. Think about that,
how much is a transfer of wealth from the
Federal Government to a private company.
By way of the ACA aka Obamacare, where
in many states UH was the last company
to offer coverage, which of course is
still mandated in most states.

People are forced to buy it to avoid
paying fines, and in many cases have
no choice between carriers.

This is a level of corruption that is
on another level. And it was made
"legal" by declaring the ACA as a "tax".

Zero accountability to any investigative
agency as far as I know.

Strange how the CEO was taken out
right before he testified before Congress.

a reply to: burntheships

"Strange how the CEO was taken out right before he testified before Congress."
nah he just got taken out because he was pretty bad

a reply to: i664k

As if he is the only one...right?

I see a lot of little red fish flying about.

"Look over here!"

I predict the perp will never be found.

a reply to: burntheships

violationtracker.goodjobsfirst.org...

a reply to: i664k

Yes, yes I know all about that.

I see a lot of folks foolishly cheering his demise.

But lets be real. Who is enabling that horrid
record? Who created that monster?

As I mentioned before, the ACA act is
inherently responsible. Anytime that
Uncle Sam is in charge of anything, let
alone health care, one can expect that
kind of corruption.

As I said, IMO this story is a distraction
start to finish. Oh, there are many people
involved, corrupt to the hilt. Follow the
money, as I reported UH posted a 90 billion
profit in one year.

That is not just one man, that is high rise
floor in Washington DC lawyers and Senators
and Conressmen who are all complicit.

a reply to: burntheships
i get that the healthcare system has always been corrupt but isn't the ceo just enabling this corruption tho