It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Supreme Court did not hear a case seeking to oust Biden and other elected officials
originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: xuenchen
It will never happen.
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
Must not be up to the courts then.
Wonder who has the "authority" to oust Congress ?? 😎
originally posted by: nugget1
Well, if that's the case and Trump is declared the winner of the 2020 election an installed in office wouldn't the remainder of this year count as his second term and make him inelligible to serve in 2025?
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: nugget1
nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.
originally posted by: Boomer1947
originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BingoMcGoof
Must not be up to the courts then.
Wonder who has the "authority" to oust Congress ?? 😎
The voters.
originally posted by: nugget1
Well, if that's the case and Trump is declared the winner of the 2020 election an installed in office wouldn't the remainder of this year count as his second term and make him inelligible to serve in 2025?
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: nugget1
nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.
FDR had four terms.
Source: www.newsweek.com...
Every liberal U.S. Supreme Court justice sat out of a decision this week in a rare move for the nation's highest court.
On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson sat out of a decision in Brunson v. Sotomayor, et al. Each of the three liberal justices was named as a defendant in the case. They did not provide a specific reason for sitting out and are not required to do so.
The case was brought by Raland Brunson, who attempted to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election and named the three justices as defendants for denying a writ of certiorari in a previous appeals case.
originally posted by: xuenchen
originally posted by: CriticalStinker
originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: nugget1
nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.
FDR had four terms.
But he never served 4 terms. 😄