It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

What if this is true?

page: 1
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join
share:

posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 05:58 PM
link   
According to sources on X. The SCOTUS has agreed to hear the case "Brunson Vs Adams" and has reviewed it and reacted positively. They have reached an NDA with the principals and a lid is being put on it as the US military is moved around for the upcoming civil unrest that will result. The case says that the Biden administration and congress failed to act and investigate allegations of voter fraud in the last election. Supposedly if this is true the entire Biden administration and Congress can removed from office and Trump takes over as President. Search Brunson case on X.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:08 PM
link   
Oh Boy here it comes ❗️❗️

Hey btw, can you post up a link for people to read?

TIA




posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:10 PM
link   
a reply to: xuenchen

It will never happen.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:19 PM
link   
a reply to: CosmicFocus

But it could happen. Crazier things have happened.


Trump still won against all the early on odds, and was totally outspent.
The left media bragged how much money Harris had and that the money would beat Trump.

They never appreciate the power of citizens to circumvent their pompous @sses.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:20 PM
link   
a reply to: CosmicFocus
Didn't people say that about a second Trump term?? Better stop speaking in absolutes!



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:21 PM
link   
We see by the date on the video provided that it was time stamped May 9 2023

With the chance here of a ''sources'' battle, in June 27 2023 , according to AP


Supreme Court did not hear a case seeking to oust Biden and other elected officials


apnews.com...< br />
Yet, if the ''sources ''' on X are correct and ths AP release is not, what signs are there that the US military is being moved around to prepare for the civil unrest that did not happen at that time.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:37 PM
link   

originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: xuenchen

It will never happen.


The story won't, or the OP posting a link won't?

😁



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:40 PM
link   
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Must not be up to the courts then.

Wonder who has the "authority" to oust Congress ?? 😎



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 06:55 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Must not be up to the courts then.

Wonder who has the "authority" to oust Congress ?? 😎


The voters.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:00 PM
link   
Well, if that's the case and Trump is declared the winner of the 2020 election an installed in office wouldn't the remainder of this year count as his second term and make him inelligible to serve in 2025?



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:04 PM
link   
a reply to: nugget1

nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: nugget1
Well, if that's the case and Trump is declared the winner of the 2020 election an installed in office wouldn't the remainder of this year count as his second term and make him inelligible to serve in 2025?


Hearing you. Thought about his a while ago and was just thinking it again after reading all this. I'm not from USA but understand the repercussions.

Guess Biden served his term which may annul this.

My thoughts,

Kind regards,

Bally.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:08 PM
link   
a reply to: Xerleh2

Sources on X say wild things all the time that rarely come true.

The parts that stand out to me immediately are the charges of treason and the military moving around.

If they were pursuing this, I imagine they would go for sedition over treason. Treason in the legal sense would be someone acting with foreign adversaries. Even if a few did that, you wouldn’t go after all the congressmen too just because they didn’t speak to open the case if they didn’t directly conspire with foreign actors.

If the military was moving at that scale, I imagine it would be pretty obvious. But in reality, I don’t think it would be necessary.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:10 PM
link   

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: nugget1

nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.


FDR had four terms.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:12 PM
link   

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Must not be up to the courts then.

Wonder who has the "authority" to oust Congress ?? 😎


The voters.


But the whole Senate isn't up for election every 2 years. 😬



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:14 PM
link   

originally posted by: nugget1
Well, if that's the case and Trump is declared the winner of the 2020 election an installed in office wouldn't the remainder of this year count as his second term and make him inelligible to serve in 2025?


He was never officially sworn in for 2020, so they'd have to let him be President for concurrent terms. Right? 😀



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:15 PM
link   

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: nugget1

nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.


FDR had four terms.


But he never served 4 terms. 😄



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 07:31 PM
link   
WHY ARE LIBERAL JUSTICES SO AFRAID OF RALAND BRUNSON?

From June 1st 2024:

Every liberal U.S. Supreme Court justice sat out of a decision this week in a rare move for the nation's highest court.

On Tuesday, Supreme Court Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson sat out of a decision in Brunson v. Sotomayor, et al. Each of the three liberal justices was named as a defendant in the case. They did not provide a specific reason for sitting out and are not required to do so.

The case was brought by Raland Brunson, who attempted to challenge the results of the 2020 presidential election and named the three justices as defendants for denying a writ of certiorari in a previous appeals case.
Source: www.newsweek.com...

Justice Sonia Sotomayor says she goes into her office and cries!
😨



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 08:20 PM
link   
Well, I personally think this will be something Pam Bondi will take up and act on. She's like that. I'm not sure how exactly she'll pursue it, but I can almost guarantee she won't let it just die.

If she's smart (which she clearly is), I'd hope she'll save the real savory parts for about year 2.5 of the Trump presidency, and then start floating things out there. These kinds of things take 8-9 months to get in front of a judge, so that will put the Trump camp at about year 3.5. Trump can't run again, but wiping out the criminal swamp with a serious death blow right before the elections might give us some hope.

Those are my thoughts anyway.



posted on Nov, 24 2024 @ 08:44 PM
link   

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: CriticalStinker

originally posted by: worldstarcountry
a reply to: nugget1

nah, he will just go down in history as the only POTUS to officially have three terms. Now that would be quite a milestone to achieve and would certainly make him smile.


FDR had four terms.


But he never served 4 terms. 😄


But he did serve three 🤷‍♂️



new topics

top topics



 
16
<<   2 >>

log in

join