France gives Ukraine license to fire long-range missiles at Russia

a reply to: Boomer1947

Don’t forget the Samson option, Iran goes full on overrun mode, Iran is glass.

Btw how is the US going to support Israel and Ukraine when it gets hot? And then having the assets to shake a stick at China from Taiwan?

a reply to: Boomer1947

Your words are the same patterned words of recent election losers. The same ones who had their words tumble into the opposite of what they were saying. The more you emphasize something not happening, the more likely it'll be happening. ☠️☠️ Hopefully stronger people are working to stop you.

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: xuenchen

They're doing their best to setup Trump for a bad scene.

With all due respect, I don't think Trump or Biden are primary considerations in deciding French foreign policy....they are very much their own people.

..except when they make decisions based on the NWO agenda. 👁‍🗨

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

a reply to: xuenchen

NATO is supporting Ukraine. If they really stepped in that would be a big escalation and you would be criticizing Biden for it.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Oh yeah NATO is doing a great job as both sides keep getting their heads blown off 🤣🤣🤣

a reply to: xuenchen

Nearly three years now.

What do you want, WW3?

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

If NATO got fully and directly involved it would be over in a few weeks.

However the danger of Putin actually pushing the big red button would go up exponentially.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

Like how we let Croatia take Krajina (land grab) from another sovereign country in the 90s, and then brought Croatia in nato shortly after?

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

Like how we let Croatia take Krajina (land grab) from another sovereign country in the 90s, and then brought Croatia in nato shortly after?

The topic isn't your alternative history of the dissolution of Yugoslavia.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

If NATO got fully and directly involved it would be over in a few weeks.

However the danger of Putin actually pushing the big red button would go up exponentially.

Source that it would be over in a “few weeks” ?


It took nato 78 days of brutal bombing on little Serbia in 99’



Where even Serbia shot down a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter.

78 days serial bombing campaign on a little country like Serbia.



Try that on a much larger and stronger super nuclear country like Russia.

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

If NATO got fully and directly involved it would be over in a few weeks.

However the danger of Putin actually pushing the big red button would go up exponentially.

Source that it would be over in a “few weeks” ?


It took nato 78 days of brutal bombing on little Serbia in 99’

Where even Serbia shot down a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter.

78 days serial bombing campaign on a little ass country like Serbia.

Try that on a much larger and stronger super nuclear country like Russia.

en.wikipedia.org...

NATO deployed a fraction of it assets in a very limited way.

Not exactly fully involved.

a reply to: Imhere

Start a thread on it?

Be sure to include "Genocide" in the title.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

If NATO got fully and directly involved it would be over in a few weeks.

However the danger of Putin actually pushing the big red button would go up exponentially.

Source that it would be over in a “few weeks” ?


It took nato 78 days of brutal bombing on little Serbia in 99’

Where even Serbia shot down a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter.

78 days serial bombing campaign on a little ass country like Serbia.

Try that on a much larger and stronger super nuclear country like Russia.

en.wikipedia.org...

NATO deployed a fraction of it assets in a very limited way.

Not exactly fully involved.

A few thousand dead and wounded civilians during the bombing doesn’t sound very limited.

So do you have a source about your claim that it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in?

I at least posted sources that it took nato 78 days of a brutal bombing campaign on a much, much smaller country like Serbia in 99’ and even had a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter shot down during it.

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

If NATO got fully and directly involved it would be over in a few weeks.

However the danger of Putin actually pushing the big red button would go up exponentially.

Source that it would be over in a “few weeks” ?


It took nato 78 days of brutal bombing on little Serbia in 99’

Where even Serbia shot down a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter.

78 days serial bombing campaign on a little ass country like Serbia.

Try that on a much larger and stronger super nuclear country like Russia.

en.wikipedia.org...

NATO deployed a fraction of it assets in a very limited way.

Not exactly fully involved.

lol yea ok

So do you have a source about your claim that it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in?

I at least posted sources that it took nato 78 days of a brutal bombing campaign on a much, much smaller country like Serbia in 99’ and even had a F-117 Nighthawk stealth fighter shot down during it.

NATO is much much bigger, better equped and better trained than Russia. The glory days of the USSR are long in the past

The only reason it would take a few weeks is the logistics of moving assets into place.

The reason Putin likes to make such a big deal about nuclear weapons is he knows this is the only card he has left.

a reply to: Imhere

"So do you have a source about your claim that it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in?"

Yes, common sense and reality.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Imhere

"So do you have a source about your claim that it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in?"

Yes, common sense and reality.

So no source? lol

Reality here is it took nato 78 days in a serial bombing campaign against Serbia in 99’. Who is a much, much smaller country than Russia.

78 days and had a stealth fighter shot down by a couple dudes turning the radar on and off and used “common sense” lol

The nato bombing left a few thousand civilian casualties thanks to “high precision targeting” that had a camera on it showing a cruise missile flying straight into a packed civilian train.



[youtube]https://youtu.be/t6zKEUGsPCo[/youtube]

Not to mention that nato “accidentally” bombed the Chinese during it lol



Again no source from either of you claiming it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in etc.

Zero chance it would only take a few weeks to take over Russia. And it would lead to nuclear exchanges later on anyway. That’s common sense and reality.


Gg’s.

originally posted by: Imhere

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Imhere

"So do you have a source about your claim that it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in?"

Yes, common sense and reality.

So no source?

Reality here is it took nato 78 days of serial bombing against Serbia in 99’. Who is a much, much smaller country than Russia.

78 days and had a stealth fighter got shot down by a couple dudes turning the radar on and off and used “common sense” lol

The nato bombing left a few thousand civilian casualties thanks to “high precision targeting” that had camera on it showing cruise missiles flying straight into a packed civilian train.

Not to mention that nato “accidentally” bombed the Chinese during it lol

Again no source from either of you claiming it would be over “in a few weeks” if nato directly stepped in etc.

Zero chance it would only take a few weeks to take over Russia. And it would lead to nuclear exchanges later on anyway. That’s common sense and reality.


Gg’s.

No one said take over Russia. Russia is the one trying to take over other countries.

Using your example it took NATO 11 weeks using only a fraction of it airpower and no ground troops to achieve its aims with minimal casualties.

Russia has had almost 3 years with a full on invasion and war economy and hundreds of thousands of casualties and is still not even close to achieving it's aims.

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: BedevereTheWise

originally posted by: Lazy88

originally posted by: Boomer1947


That's why there won't be a nuclear war any time soon in the sense that you are thinking about. No nuclear power is going to attack another nuclear power with nuclear weapons unless their national survival is at stake. That means that Russia will not attack the UK,

It’s not about the survival of Russia, it’s about Putin holding on to as much power as possible. That’s the wild card.

While we dump billions into the Ukraine so one corrupt government can fight another corrupt government? Why. So a whole generation of Ukrainian men can be lost? How is this making Europe more stable?

It's an authoritarian dictatorship doing a land grab against a sovereign democratic nation.

Allowing this to go unopposed would be catastrophic for European stability.

If European stability is such a big concern, why hasn't NATO stopped this BS yet?? How many NATO Members are bordering unstable Ukraine? How many NATO countries border Russia?

If NATO got fully and directly involved it would be over in a few weeks.

However the danger of Putin actually pushing the big red button would go up exponentially.

I said in March 2022, the world (NATO?) should send a drone into Putin's residence while he sleeps, after letting the Russian Generals know it would be because he invaded Ukraine, and everyone can go back to being at peace after Putin is vaporized.