Gaetz ethics investigation results "hacked".

www.cbsnews.com...

Politics
"Unknown and unauthorized third party" has gained access to Matt Gaetz depositions, source says
By Michael Kaplan

Updated on: November 19, 2024 / 8:34 PM EST / CBS News


Washington — An "unknown and unauthorized third party" has gained access to two dozen depositions of witnesses tied to the various investigations into former Rep. Matt Gaetz of Florida, CBS News has learned.

The leaked materials are part of a civil defamation case filed by Chris Dorworth, a lobbyist who is close to Gaetz. These materials include the sworn deposition of the minor with whom Gaetz allegedly had sex.

According to a source familiar with the matter and an email viewed by CBS News, the person who gained access went by the name "Altam Beezley."

Gaetz has denied any wrongdoing. The New York Times first reported on the alleged leak.

Gaetz was under investigation by the House Ethics Committee and Justice Department, though federal prosecutors declined to bring charges against him last year. The Ethics panel was looking into allegations the former congressman engaged in sexual misconduct and illicit drug use, among other accusations. But Gaetz resigned his seat in the House last week after President-elect Donald Trump announced he had selected the Florida Republican to serve as his attorney general.

Amazingly enough, this leaked. But it's for the best in the end. All the dirt in that report is all the dirt on him. So if it's a 21 year old kid partying, I suppose it is. But folks in glass houses and all....

I was against this first off, as he nuked the house and I think there was a much better way of doing it. But If Gaetz isn't owned by some entity, he would be the perfect guy to clean house. He will be hated by the scum, and trashed by the same, but I think he would enjoy the job, and do the giant task of flushing the bowl. Perhaps a little scrub as well. Perhaps some citrus scent.

originally posted by: network dude
Perhaps some citrus scent.

I think a pine scent might be better. Along with all the other things you proposed he could do.

The only leaks now are from the sources themselves. How have some not caught on that anytime a Conservative is put up for anything they are somehow found to be a 'sexual predator'.

And on the flip side, you have those same Progressives caught in deviant behavior.

The cycle goes on but not for much longer. He is not even in office and the dumpster nukes are starting.

a reply to: network dude

For me, it's not the report itself. It's who exactly hacked it. F I DID I ..... I'd like to solve the puzzle.

It all began with:

The saga began with salacious claims involving Gaetz and alleged child sex trafficking, spearheaded by Joel Greenberg—a man with more scandals to his name than most career criminals. Greenberg, the former Seminole County tax collector, has been aptly described as “one of the most corrupt Florida politicians of all time” by reporter Marc Caputo. Let's not lose sight of Greenberg's rap sheet: identity theft, sex trafficking, public corruption, stalking, fraudulent loans—a laundry list that could earn him the title of ‘Florida Man Extraordinaire.’ But the most egregious aspect of Greenberg’s sordid tale is his propensity to lie and smear those around him. He falsely accused his own political rival, a schoolteacher named Brian Beute, of sexual misconduct with a minor, all to gain a leg up in a local election. That is the credibility level of Gaetz's accuser—a man who, as Judge Gregory Presnell noted, carried out actions that were “downright evil.”

The Department of Justice itself, after a protracted investigation, recognized the lack of credibility behind Greenberg's allegations against Gaetz. It dropped the case in 2022, unwilling to proceed on the basis of such flimsy evidence. But for some members of the House Ethics Committee, the DOJ's conclusion meant nothing. They saw an opportunity—not for truth, but for revenge. [...]

But the leaks came anyway. Despite his resignation removing jurisdiction from the Ethics Committee, the allegations made their way to the press and into the hands of Senate Democrats and RINOs eager to see Gaetz’s downfall. The Committee relied on the same discredited witnesses, the same Joel Greenberg and his coerced accomplice, known only as “A.B.” This woman, “A.B.,” was deeply intertwined in Greenberg's criminal undertakings—lying about her age on a sugar daddy website, engaging in acts for money, and even participating in pornographic content. The court itself, through Judge Presnell, had called her “essentially a prostitute.” This is the ‘witness’ they are relying on to destroy Gaetz's career.

What they don't want anybody to know:

The farcical nature of the charges is further underscored by a lawsuit filed in 2023 by former Florida state representative Chris Dorworth against Greenberg. In this suit, Dorworth details how Greenberg pressured and coerced “A.B.” into falsely implicating Gaetz, even going so far as to cover her legal expenses in exchange for her cooperation. And if that wasn’t enough, a letter surfaced from a jailhouse informant who shared a cell with Greenberg—an informant who testified that Greenberg admitted to fabricating the accusations against Gaetz to reduce his own prison sentence. Two former federal agents interviewed the inmate, who confirmed Greenberg’s admission. In the face of such overwhelming evidence of deceit, it’s absurd that the allegations have even the smallest bit of credibility in the media.

[https...://politiquerepublic.substack.com/p/the-witch-hunt-against-matt-gaetz?publication_id=840660&post_id=151783869&isFreemail=true&r=1a7v68&tr iedRedirect=true]

freerepublic.com...

Ah, the leaks that plagued the first Trump administration and were virtually non existent during the Biden administration are starting early.

The administrative state must not be happy Donald Trump won the election.

Chock full of 2nd hand hearsay and wild accusations similar to the Blasey Ford stories and dozens of other claims. No proof of anything as the crow flies. 😁

Who leaked it anyways? Dollars to Donuts it's ___________________ again. 👁‍🗨

a reply to: nugget1

Is this the same guy they call Hollywood Honk? Good friend of Andrew Gillum and all the petty Nickle-Dime jealousy that goes with it.

a reply to: Dandandat3
I'm so confused on which side you're on. You're not a Trump supporter, but you didn't seem to be a Kamala supporter either.

Who did you vote for?

originally posted by: billxam1
a reply to: network dude

For me, it's not the report itself. It's who exactly hacked it. F I DID I ..... I'd like to solve the puzzle.

Same person who hacked the Supreme Court's Abortion decision in 2023? These "hacks" always are intended to hurt Republicans/Conservatives. Most like an "insider" at one of the U.S. agencies. (85% of all Fed Employees are Democrats)

a reply to: network dude

i know his supporters are gonna come up with some reason he went to trump looking for a pardon when all this started.
imo a innocent person doesn't go looking for pardons before he goes to court.

The January 6 House Select committee has released the interview transcripts from a Donald Trump aide who testified that Florida congressman Matt Gaetz sought a preemptive presidential pardon in relation to a child sex trafficking probe.
Matt Gaetz Pardon Request Related to Trafficking Probe—Testimony Transcript

a reply to: network dude

If Garlands DoJ couldn't find cause to prosecute, then it's a meh

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Hard to prove if he did or didn't unless he admits it. This is more 2nd hand hearsay with no proof. Standard Operating Procedure. 😀

a reply to: xuenchen

say what you want, he was afraid enough to go looking for a pardon even after the guy that was using it to extort him was convicted and in prison.

where there's smoke nine times out of 10 there's some sort of fire and the 10th one is smoldering coals.

a reply to: SourGrapes

I'm on America's side.

amazing how these "leaks" are almost exclusively one side of the aisle.



Gee I wonber...

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Yea, I'd be afraid of the government too if I was innocent and in their cross hairs. A person's innocence doesn't seem to be a deciding factor in these cases.

Especially when they have a whole chunck of the population who think 9 times out of 10 your guilty until proven innocent.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Timing, this would have been around the #metoo height if memory is correct.

You think people didnt get railroaded during that time period??

a reply to: BernnieJGato

Biden's corrupt DOJ spent 3 years investigating it and decided not to press charges...

And the ethics committee just today decided not to release it because it's BS.

originally posted by: BernnieJGato
a reply to: xuenchen

say what you want, he was afraid enough to go looking for a pardon even after the guy that was using it to extort him was convicted and in prison.

where there's smoke nine times out of 10 there's some sort of fire and the 10th one is smoldering coals.

I actually agree, but he denies asking for a pardon, and Trump says he never asked for a pardon. Again it's all hearsay for smear purposes. There's nothing in writing and no recordings either. Strange. No proof goes a long way. 😬