Turns out, they planned to go after P-nut.

link to story

P’Nut the Squirrel and Fred the Raccoon did not have rabies, officials announced — as it was revealed the animals were marked for death and decapitation days before they were seized by the state.

The internet famous P’Nut and his raccoon pal were taken from an Upstate New York home by force in a raid by state agents on Oct. 30 that sparked outrage and accusations of government overreach as the pets were euthanized to test for rabies.

“Results are negative,” Chemung County Executive Christopher Moss told The Post Tuesday.

A newly revealed timeline shows state officials advised the county to euthanize the pets a full seven days before they were taken from their unofficial caretaker Mark Longo on Oct. 30 — even though the Department of Environmental Conservation later said the squirrel bit an agent during the raid, sparking the need for the test.

OK, today, it was a squirrel and a raccoon. No big deal, they were just animals. Just some guys pets. But the deception involved here is a bit frightening. This agency planned to kill this guys squirrel a week before the raid. I have to stop here, to point out, that they used a real live raid to go after this. Reminiscent of Mar-a-Lago not long ago. So they planned to kill this squirrel, and they executed the plan. And the squirrel. Like they planned. So the question remains, if they would do this, over a #ing squirrel, what would they do to you?

a reply to: network dude

We all know what really happened...

a reply to: network dude

We have seen things like this before, over nonsense made up by a disgruntled neighbor

Wake Up People

Loosing P'nut in that manner is just gut-wrencing. Democrats will keep losing more of their base with this behavior, yet never understand why they lose elections.

“Show me the man and I’ll show you the crime” seems to be the #1 rule in the playbook of Democrats.

a reply to: network dude

The world changed with the killing of Harambe in 2016. It was likely the first domino to fall.

I think Peanut may be a similar precursor.

a reply to: network dude

I read yesterday that they didn't even have rabies. Negative for rabies. Just cold blooded murder.

No big deal, they were just animals. Just some guys pets

I gather you don't have any, or you wouldn't type a sentence like this. Fur babies are people too.

a reply to: Shoshanna

Yup, but they had to kill it so they could run the test.

Of all of the evolutions in medical science, still the only way to test for rabies's by the freshly dead brain matter of the animal. But, in humans they use saliva, spinal fluid and skin biopsies.

Officials were Frustrated they couldn't get Trump, so they lowered their sights to a target more suitable for their level of expertise.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Shoshanna

Yup, but they had to kill it so they could run the test.

Of all of the evolutions in medical science, still the only way to test for rabies's by the freshly dead brain matter of the animal. But, in humans they use saliva, spinal fluid and skin biopsies.

That sounds suspicious as h3ll though why do they have to kill the animal to test it? I read that the human means of testing isn't always 100 percent like with the spinal fluid and biopsy but I don't know. Just seems weird that we can test humans without killing them but not animals. Probably a conspiracy theory somewhere in that.

a reply to: Shoshanna

Yeah, nothing seems right about it.

www.health.state.mn.us...

We had a case, earlier this year, here in Missouri that a local cop shot an old blind dog on a hot summer day because it was drinking too much water while being detained in a neighbors yard so the owner could return to retrieve it and he suspected it of having rabies. This cop had done this type of thing before.

a reply to: Shoshanna

Especially if it’s transmitted by bite / saliva? I guess it probably depends on how far along the disease is, and how rabid?

But they were giving out covid shots like candy. If they were worried about a bite, just give the rabies shot to the person?

They could have just kept the animals in quarantine and see what happened.

a reply to: Lazy88

They knew the animal did not have rabies, they just wanted an excuse to kill it. They were using it as a punishment for the guy that had it as an "illegal pet".

a reply to: PorkChop96

As vaccine crazy New York is, you would think a rabies vaccine for animal control workers would be mandatory?

Rabies

www.who.int...


Pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) is recommended for people in high-risk occupations (laboratory workers handling live rabies and related viruses) and people whose professional or personal activities might lead to direct contact with infected animals (animal disease control staff and wildlife rangers).

PrEP might be indicated before recreation or travel in some areas, and for people living in remote, highly rabies-endemic areas with limited local access to rabies biologicals.

Note that PrEP does not replace the need for PEP. Any person exposed to a suspected rabid animal should still seek post exposure care.

The last paragraph is interesting?

a reply to: WeMustCare

Care this is about the numbers. Connecting some facts here.
Spanish Flu 1918-1920

Isn't it interesting that Covid appeared 100 years later?
[S]quirrel= 19
[R]accoon=18

They are certifiable and evil. There are no guardrails so anything goes.
---
March 11, 2020 the WHO declared the plandemic. The first case of the Spanish Flu occured March 11, 1918.
April 11 Biden ends the Covid emergency

Wuhan happens to have a population of 11 million people, according to Scott Gottlieb, as documented in his thriller "Uncontrolled Spread". [former FDA Commissioner who resigned late 2019 and joined the Pfizer board.]

The squirrel was hoarding classified documents....they used some classified ads to make his bed.

They assumed that the squirrel was a conservative....so they needed to do away with conservatives. But the Feds didn't realize that p-nut and Fred actually identified as a human. So, technically they not conservatives, their race was what caused them to die. The Biden administration had elements of KKK in it but they have to change it now to new initials...Kill Raccoons and Squirrels...KRS is this branch of the KKK now.

a reply to: Thoughtful3

Since you have apparently learned the pattern/code, you should be able to predict what "big event" (bad or good) is coming next for humanity. What do you think it will be?

originally posted by: TzarChasm

No big deal, they were just animals. Just some guys pets

I gather you don't have any, or you wouldn't type a sentence like this. Fur babies are people too.

I have two dogs, 5 cats, and an ass load of chickens. I was being sarcastic. I'll have to remember to put that stuff in Italics next time.

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Shoshanna

Yup, but they had to kill it so they could run the test.

Of all of the evolutions in medical science, still the only way to test for rabies's by the freshly dead brain matter of the animal. But, in humans they use saliva, spinal fluid and skin biopsies.

Couple of months quarantine is used in the UK, when animals enter from rabies countries.
I'm guessing that either the 'quarantine industry' in the UK is really powerful, or it's the only way to confirm an animal is rabies free, without cutting it's head off.

The keeper of the animal wasn't even given the option to fund the quarantine, same as the big fees for anyone importing animals to the UK.

Nope, this whole thing sounds like a completely needless killing, with the only reason I can see being a strong message to citizens: "You must comply, do not question our authority"

a reply to: network dude

They killed those two animals for no other reason than people loved them.
You will never convince me otherwise.
This is the communist utopia they want.