Elon's Starlink Stole The Election For Trump--Leftist Conspiracy Theorists Charge

So, it appears that many 'Blue Anons' are now charging that since Elon Musk's Starlink satellite system was used in the election to help count votes (presumably by being hooked up to voting machines through the Internet in swing states and California)...Elon was somehow able to 'do bad stuff' with the votes in order to have his boy Trump emerge victorious from the election.

Left-wing conspiracy theorists are saying Trump stole the election with help from Elon's Starlink satellites

notthebee.com...

Nefariously brilliant, if true...and it appears the CT is gaining traction among upset Kamala devotees.


Will it be only a matter of time before the Left starts demanding paper ballots, voter ID and no more satellites?

a reply to: CarlLaFong

They're right.

It couldn't possibly be that the Democrats ran an unpopular candidate, pushing the same Liberal BS that has wrecked this country for the last 4 years.

Yeah. It's Elon's fault.

Even in the face of a staggering loss, they still can't admit they have no one to blame but themselves.

Cool! Now for them to provide evidence of a steal! Let's use their standards. I'm going to go back and use direct quotes from our members that denied any misdeeds in 2020.

originally posted by: DAVID64
a reply to: CarlLaFong

They're right.

It couldn't possibly be that the Democrats ran an unpopular candidate, pushing the same Liberal BS that has wrecked this country for the last 4 years.

Yeah. It's Elon's fault.

Even in the face of a staggering loss, they still can't admit they have no one to blame but themselves.

Clearly, Elon had help from Russia.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Election interference !!!! We need an investigation !

Maybe they even got tapes of Willy and Kamala doing the mattress mambo.

Most Democrats know Kamala was an empty suit with a skimpy resume of achievements. Even they held their nose when voting for her.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Unfounded and baseless election denial!

Now, will they be subjected to four years of ridicule and prosecution? Nah!

a reply to: WeMustCare

If Starlink was, indeed, monitoring vote counts in swing states...it might actually explain why they WEREN'T tampered with in those states...this time.

a reply to: DAVID64

Yep I am sure that the soon to be Trumps DOJ will run and start to gather the data for a congressional hearing, oops I forgot, that is not in the hands of the GOP too.

This was the only predictable thing from this election.

It’s going to be all of them now. Neither side will ever see the irony when they’re the ones claiming it was rigged.

My side won: super obvious, the American people were ready for change.

My side lost: No way to logically explain it other than cheating.

They cant push 2024 because it was such a huge win #1 and #2 Id say fine let's do a complete audit on 2020 too.

Going after 2024 hard would set the precedent, and cost tens of millions in legal fees the DNC does not have since everybody took a slice of the billion-dollar pie campaign fund pie.

Rumors are usual that donors no longer trust the Democrats to deliver on their dollars spent, some are suggesting the financial spigot is being turned off

a reply to: CarlLaFong

So. They are admitting that the voting machines are hackable and network capable? I think we all knew that long ago. Stop using electronic voting machines and problem fixed. Simple.

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
This was the only predictable thing from this election.

It’s going to be all of them now. Neither side will ever see the irony when they’re the ones claiming it was rigged.

My side won: super obvious, the American people were ready for change.

My side lost: No way to logically explain it other than cheating.

Yeah, I know but there's a huge difference in the winning margins, Critical Stinker.... 2020 was one of the closest elections ever while 2024 was much different

a reply to: putnam6

2000 was close too.

Clinton won because of Ross Perot (pretty valid)
Bush won because of hanging chads
Obama wasn’t a US citizen
Trump Russia
Biden rigged the election
Now musk stole it.

One thing absent from all of those losses, the parties looking within to see how they can appeal to voters. It’s always blaming on external elements, and never accepting accountability.

Before this Musk narrative, I saw Reddit blaming people who didn’t vote, or voted for Stein (like those votes would have made a difference).

2020 was definitely a close election. But there was a lot going on at the time to make an abnormal election as well. Trump, Lindell, and many others promised bullet proof evidence that it was rigged. I never saw any of them release it.

a reply to: CarlLaFong

but they said the voting machines couldn't be hacked, and then they turn around and say that they were and think people are to stupid to remember they said that.

talk about morons

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
a reply to: putnam6

2000 was close too.

Clinton won because of Ross Perot (pretty valid)
Bush won because of hanging chads
Obama wasn’t a US citizen
Trump Russia
Biden rigged the election
Now musk stole it.

One thing absent from all of those losses, the parties looking within to see how they can appeal to voters. It’s always blaming on external elements, and never accepting accountability.

Before this Musk narrative, I saw Reddit blaming people who didn’t vote, or voted for Stein (like those votes would have made a difference).

2020 was definitely a close election. But there was a lot going on at the time to make an abnormal election as well. Trump, Lindell, and many others promised bullet proof evidence that it was rigged. I never saw any of them release it.

Yeah maybe I ate too much of this edible, but we were talking about 2024, FWIW my guy won and I'd gladly open it up to auditing AGAIN as long as we did 2020 too.

As for 2000 yeah it was BS and dangling chads and Jeb Bush and boom we have Dubya as President but Obama won handily and Clinton won 68% in 92 and 70% in 96

4 elections since 2000 had smaller normalized margins for the 2000s so it seems like a mandate to me, or maybe it's just the perception because all we heard was how close it would be EVERYWHERE here included.

en.wikipedia.org...

originally posted by: CriticalStinker
This was the only predictable thing from this election.

It’s going to be all of them now. Neither side will ever see the irony when they’re the ones claiming it was rigged.

My side won: super obvious, the American people were ready for change.

My side lost: No way to logically explain it other than cheating.

Can you explain the odd little 15-18 million vote bump that happened in 2020 after the election closed only in swing states in certain counties?

You can't say 2020 was a close race.

After all, Biden got more votes than any President in our history.

a reply to: CriticalStinker

That one was 1992 😬

a reply to: putnam6

I think Trump won this one. I find some of the left coming ip with elaborate conspiracy theories laughable.

As for the rest of them, the problem is always going to be crying wolf. Both sides do it every time, no way I can take them seriously, and maybe I do overlook something serious. I think many people who aren’t in a party feel that way.

So to me, the smartest play would be run a decent candidate, and you improve your odds. Run a good candidate, you have an edge. But that would require introspection, something I think the big party machines lack.

It’s turned into team sports. Winning is the primary goal, and if the party actually ends up doing good, that’s just a bonus.

But I’ve seen both parties eat a chit sandwich just so the other side would have to sit there and smell it. And while that feeling of winning, and vindictiveness can be satisfying for those buying into the team sports, it leaves a whole bunch of the country as collateral damage.

States that do not require voter ID should
think about security then. Voter ID, Paper
Ballots, hard to mess that up right?