Tomorrow will be the 7th day after the election, and they are still counting

Yah they’re still stalling to see when/where/how they can sneak in some ballots to push some Smurfs to ‘victory’ so the republicans don’t get a sweep. I watched something that said Schumer won’t allow someone who won(republican) to join because he said votings not final yet, even though the math was checking out at 99% . Forgive my COnVID vaxxed brain is acting up lately. Can’t recall names etc.

They must be trying to ensure Repubs don't have as large of a majority in congress and senate. They couldn't stop Trump, but may be able to weaken his mandate with Congressional and senate seats.

originally posted by: Kaiju666
Yah they’re still stalling to see when/where/how they can sneak in some ballots to push some Smurfs to ‘victory’ so the republicans don’t get a sweep. I watched something that said Schumer won’t allow someone who won(republican) to join because he said votings not final yet, even though the math was checking out at 99% . Forgive my COnVID vaxxed brain is acting up lately. Can’t recall names etc.

GOP Pennsylvania Senator-Elect Dave McCormick

Schumer is Not Allowing GOP Pennsylvania Senator-Elect Dave McCormick Into Senate Orientation Because Democrat Bob Casey Refuses to Concede

A statement from Secretary Al Schmidt:⁰⁰Throughout the day, the Department has communicated with counties who continue to conduct a secure election where every eligible vote is counted.⁰⁰We estimate there are at least 100,000 ballots remaining to be adjudicated, including… — PA Department of State (@PAStateDept) November 7, 2024

Wow! Only another 100,000 ballots to adjudicate, two days after the election never the less.

As I mentioned earlier:

Adjudication, via Dominion and similar election software, is when election workers can change the vote makings on the electronic images of already cast ballots. For example, election workers could decide that although someone voted for Trump, they think that that voter meant to vote for the Democratic Senate candidate instead of the Republican one they selected.

There used to be a video online that appeared to show election software salesmen mentioning that their software could not only change the vote marks on the ballot images, as shown in the video below, but could do so with marks that look imperfect and human. The only reason I can think of for such a feature, would be to somehow pass off printed adjudicated ballot images as the original ballots.

GEORGIA HEARINGS HIGHLIGH SHOCKING HOW EASY TO CHANGE BALLOT UNDER ADJUDICATION

I hope that Republicans are watching closely to the soo late counting of votes, because lets face it, democrats will do anything even murder attempt, [literarily speaking] in order to keep power.

I hope this is been watch very closely.

Dems are working real hard on those house races right now. They do not plan on certifying this election and they do not plan on letting him in the White House. The house seats are going to go a long way in how successful they will be.

Biden and Harris talking all nice and sweet about accepting the vote and having a peaceful transfer. It's too good to be true. Trump releasing info about all his plans and every single one of them is perfect. Seems too good to be true. Something is up and again, my belief, my fear, is that they are all in on this together, that this was the way it was supposed to go the whole time and the civil war they will start when they don't certify was the end goal.

Just to add. I have seen a lot of talk about how they didn't get to steal anything this time like they did in 2020. But Harris got more votes than Obama, 4 million or so I believe. Does anyone really think she was more popular than Obama and should have legitimately gotten more votes than him? If not, that means they did something on some level. To think they aren't finishing that off now with the House and even in Arizona with Kari Lake would be very naive.

Decisiondeskhq says 219 GOP / 210 DIMs. Hope that’s a true story.

originally posted by: Kaiju666
Decisiondeskhq says 219 GOP / 210 DIMs. Hope that’s a true story.

I was just sent 218/209 called.

Either way, a majority with a few seats left in play.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Kaiju666
Decisiondeskhq says 219 GOP / 210 DIMs. Hope that’s a true story.

I was just sent 218/209 called.

Either way, a majority with a few seats left in play.

A slim majority for Democrats gave them unanimous outcomes. All 223 Dems voted the same way on issues..both big and small in 2021/2022.

Republicans held a slim majority in 2023/2024, but had a hard time passing many bills...even with choosing a Speaker, because there were always 5 or 6 who didn't feel the need to vote with the majority...and didn't.

To counter the independent streak of several Republicans, it would be ideal if they had a 10 seat majority in the U.S. House.

a reply to: Lumenari

I just seen the news this morning, it is great, plus the cabinet keep filling is looking very good, plus the bogus cases against Trump are been dropped like hot cakes.

everything I'm seeing is still at 214.

I received an email from an online network I am subscribed to that said that they won the house too so I guess Decision Desk gave it to the repubs but all the others are still showing 214.

originally posted by: awhispersecho
I received an email from an online network I am subscribed to that said that they won the house too so I guess Decision Desk gave it to the repubs but all the others are still showing 214.

Legally, until the Secretary of State of each state lists the official winners, and the Governor signs off on them, the "winner" of any given race is not official.

Even when GOP is ahead on the house, the democrats in the blue states are holding back still finding ballots to count.

Is not final until those blue states said is final.

If there was any real monitoring going on I would think we would have heard something about the drops and how long it is taking. Feel like they probably all went home and are letting these states do what they want at this point. The drops in Arizona for the Senate would have been enough for some push back if there were still actively monitoring like they were on election night

originally posted by: awhispersecho
I received an email from an online network I am subscribed to that said that they won the house too so I guess Decision Desk gave it to the repubs but all the others are still showing 214.

Decisiondesk was the very first that I seen that had Trump at 312 electorals, wayyyyyyy before apnews. I’m hoping that’s a good sign. I was only checking in on those 2 though. Apnews seems to be taking forever, there percentages don’t look like they ever change. And the last seat in Washington is 2 GOP, so that’s a no brainer but don’t know if it’s counted yet on ap or what.

a reply to: WeMustCare
These States are going to continue to do this until some one is arrested and sent to prison for FRAUD

originally posted by: network dude
It's hard to put the ineptness into proper perspective. There was an election. It didn't sneak up on anyone, it's been planned for some time. The system we have for elections is a little different depending on which state you are talking about. But if we cannot get answers after 7 days, perhaps there is a serious problem. The obvious answers are, fraud, really really poor planning, idiots in charge of something important, or fraud.

If you want to avoid the accusations of fraud, then acting like you aren't trying to cheat and counting the damn ballots would be the way to accomplish that. It's clear that a few states need a total toilet flush of the folks in charge of elections. PA, CA, AZ, NV.

Here is the deal. On the first Tuesday of November, every 4 years, there is a presidential election, along with some down ballot races. I say this as a heads up to those very idiots people who would be organizing the election in 2028. Everyone sees this, everyone watches this, and since there are other states that seem perfectly capable of counting their votes, perhaps it's time to rethink how you do business.

This is how you show how good you are, or are not.

You joined in 2008 you can't possibly be to young to remember Shrub and the hanging Chad or had zero problem when election fraud is perpetrated from those you want to win? Right?

a reply to: Therealbeverage

I'm over 50, not yet 60. I remember, I just didn't give a rats ass about it back then. I was too busy raising kids. Now I have time to watch what's going on.

It's now Wednesday, day 8. Still counting. At what point do we demand some accountability?
This is unacceptable.

originally posted by: network dude
accountability

Oh wait, you're serious? I don't think anyone above us plebs know what that word even means anymore.

Considering the amount of judges, even just in regards to the presidential race, stating that the counters need to certify the results, even if they feel there are discrepancies or a hint of fraud.

We are 100% living in clown world and the more we see the further down that hole we go.