Encouraging News Media to be MAGA-PAF Should Be a Top Priority for Trump Admin 2025-2029.

a reply to: Lumenari

Without us buying the products they advertise, or subcribing to their publications, or subscribing to whatever service delivers their TV images to us (Xfinity, DirecTV, etc.), they wouldn't exist. THEY OWE US. WE OWN THEM.

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Lumenari

Allowing "free speech" is good and appropriate. What if 90% of that "free speech" emanates from outlets who don't like you?

It's the speech you don't like that needs protecting. Let's not pretend there's some kind of moral superiority involved in policing media that offends you.

No pretending. Nothing "moral". I'm upset that 90% of the U.S. media is owned by men/women who don't like MAGA Republicans.

I'd accept 50%...but not 90%. That equation MUST BE CHANGED.

a reply to: Lumenari

I’m from Australia not Canada.

And I’m free to say whatever I want. Just like people from Canada the UK and Western Europe… you’re not as special as you think you are sweat heart.

a reply to: WeMustCare

The media doesn't need to be America First, they just need to be objective.

Which they have proven to be incapable of

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: WeMustCare

Are you suggesting that the government should control the narrative broadcast by MSM?

As long as (due to owners being anti-Trump) 90% of the U.S. news media is against what the majority of Americans voted for last week, the incoming administration should encourage them to stop making most of their news about Trump/MAGA/Republicans NEGATIVE, and STOP avoiding publishing good news from Trump/Republicans/MAGA.

As long as Americans are given what we want from the big news outlets, we're satisfied.

Call that whatever you want to call it, Freeborn.

Where is that function outlined in the parameters of the executive branch as described by the constitution?

The U.S. News Media will not be 90% Anti-MAGA for very long after 1/20/2025. There are several ways to reduce that percentage. We'll see which methods are implemented.

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Lumenari

Allowing "free speech" is good and appropriate. What if 90% of that "free speech" emanates from outlets who don't like you?

It's the speech you don't like that needs protecting. Let's not pretend there's some kind of moral superiority involved in policing media that offends you.

No pretending. Nothing "moral". I'm upset that 90% of the U.S. media is owned by men/women who don't like MAGA Republicans.

I'd accept 50%...but not 90%. That equation MUST BE CHANGED.

Why does your quality of life depend on talking heads saying nice things about you?

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: TzarChasm

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: WeMustCare

Are you suggesting that the government should control the narrative broadcast by MSM?

As long as (due to owners being anti-Trump) 90% of the U.S. news media is against what the majority of Americans voted for last week, the incoming administration should encourage them to stop making most of their news about Trump/MAGA/Republicans NEGATIVE, and STOP avoiding publishing good news from Trump/Republicans/MAGA.

As long as Americans are given what we want from the big news outlets, we're satisfied.

Call that whatever you want to call it, Freeborn.

Where is that function outlined in the parameters of the executive branch as described by the constitution?

The U.S. News Media will not be 90% Anti-MAGA for very long after 1/20/2025. There are several ways to reduce that percentage. We'll see which methods are implemented.

In other words, media policing or moderating is not a function of the executive branch. That should be your second clue (1A is your first clue)

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: WeMustCare

The media doesn't need to be America First, they just need to be objective.

Which they have proven to be incapable of

The radical anti-MAGA/Anti-Trump front pages like this: www.msnbc.com... are very rare in major media. It's so radical, only goof-balls pay attention to it, and the people who write those articles, along with their bosses, will have ZERO input on shaping America for the next (at least) 4 years.

The main goal is to reduce the number of Anti-MAGA/Anti-Trump big media outlets from 90% of all America outlets, to 50% or lower.

a reply to: WeMustCare

sorry, but thats censorship

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: Lumenari

I’m from Australia not Canada.

And I’m free to say whatever I want. Just like people from Canada the UK and Western Europe… you’re not as special as you think you are sweat heart.

Are you sure you're not an American posing as an Australian? Suspicions abound 😄

originally posted by: WeMustCare
Sunday, November 10, 2024

POTENTIAl FIX: The White House could appoint a CZAR to encourage large media outlets to report MAGA-PAF news and developments HONESTLY, BALANCED, and WITHOUT HIDING POSITVES.

Might sound good in theory, but in reality that would create a very dangerous, slippery slope that we do not want to go down. No matter how annoying MSM can be...free speech should always be allowed (except for the kind that promotes hate or threatens harm to others)

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: WeMustCare

The media doesn't need to be America First, they just need to be objective.

Which they have proven to be incapable of

The Trump administration should include thegatewaypundit and other nontraditional news organizations into the presidential press corp, provide podcastors and others with press passes and make the msm legacy press folks sit there and deal with it. That may be a way of shifting the focus of media access to where people are now actually getting there news from.

The Trump administration could develop and institute a media system for themselves, competing with the communist mainstream media but telling the absolute truth. The cmm will "fact check" everything said and shown, but the Trump Truth Media will countermand with the truth of everything said and then show the lies of the cmm.

I would have no qualms with that as long as the cmm is allowed to exist. Free speech MUST continue to exist in our constitutional representative republic. Exposing the citizenry and the world to the absolute truth would hopefully affect the cmm into changing or capitulating.

originally posted by: DBCowboy

originally posted by: WeMustCare

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: WeMustCare

Nope. Free speech must be kept free, no infringement on first Amendment rights.

Here's a new article detailing how NEWS MEDIA being against the majority of Americans is NOT SMART.

Source: thehill.com...

Don't care.

1st Amendment.

Free speech.

I agree.

There is a problem with the relationship that the majority of the MSM has with the Leftists though.

I noticed it first on election night in 2016 when an ABC anchor said “we can still win here” pointing to a state with numbers in favour of Hillary.

They can’t pretend to be a news provider with the baggage of bias they carry.

How to deal with it is through the ratings. Don’t watch.

Problem is that nearly half of your population laps it up like milk.

a reply to: WeMustCare

The main goal is to reduce the number of Anti-MAGA/Anti-Trump big media outlets from 90% of all America outlets, to 50% or lower.

Damn, WMC-you've done gone and turned liberal BAMN flake on us! 'My way or seven ways from Sunday' didn't sit well with a lot of people, as we saw on 11/5. Careful you don't cancel yourself with your authoritan rhetoric.

a reply to: WeMustCare

If President Trump delivers on his policies the problem will take care of itself.

It should impact citizen’s lives in a way that the media will be unable to filter it.

The media will change or sink.

a reply to: NightFlight

I think he already has it in motion, it's called Truth Social. He has a system in place and when he is sworn in it will only be a matter of time before he nationalizes it as his Voice to America. It will be government funded, and fact checked by his own administration. Just like FDR had his fire side chats, Trump will have his daily opinions on everything piped out onto the internet and on one will need to ever hear anything else ever again.

a reply to: nugget1


BOOM

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

I didn’t see you complaining when the Biden Harris administration was basically telling Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube what to censor and when to censor it.
Acting like that never happened while at the same time saying the Trump administration is going to do worse is not a good look.
It’s clear who the genuine authoritarians and their fans are.

a reply to: TzarChasm

You don't mind 90% of the U.S. media being anti-Trump/Anti-Republican/Anti-MAGA.

That's fine. But you're in the minority.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: WeMustCare

sorry, but thats censorship

So be it. 90% of US media being against the majority of Americans is unacceptable.