Mother Sentenced to over 2 years for Shouting at police During Disorder

Another person who should have been dealt with a suspended sentence and fine has today been sent down for shouting "incendiary and racist" remarks at police has been given over 2 years in prison , just over a year with remission , what made it worse for the judge is that she had an 11-year-old boy with her although she was intending to take to the local skate park when she saw the protest and decided to check it out and shout at police ... it's Tamworth FFS !

Hurty words = jail in Stalins Utopia.

Aimie Hodgkinson-Hedgecox pleaded guilty to violent disorder after she was recorded shouting "incendiary and racist" remarks at police outside a Holiday Inn Express in Tamworth, Staffordshire.

She reacted angrily to her sentence at Stafford Crown Court, looking towards friends and relatives in the public gallery and complaining: "It's a joke, it's a f****** piss-take."

Passing sentence, Judge Jonathan Gosling told the 37-year-old defendant she was "clearly visible" in footage from the riot and was "recording the unfolding violence".

He added Hodgkinson-Hedgecox's offending was seriously aggravated by taking the boy to the scene.
news.sky.com...

I of course support the Dear Leader in all that he does , Hurty words wreck lives !

Disgusting.


To bad you guys can’t do anything about it and have already been replaced by a new voter block.

Your police arnt even armed and are useless and now they actively hunt you.


a reply to: gortex

a reply to: gortex

it's the best way to teach folks that they just can't say things unless they make those in power feel nice. Say something mean, go to jail. A few of those, and folks will shut their pie holes and act like good obedient citizens.

So….

What’d she actually say to them?

I hate to see the loss of freedom the UK seems to be experiencing, for words.

Not to be that guy, but, I am glad Trump won last night. Maybe his actions in the US can help stop the insanity over there.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

It must have been some kind of truth. They don't like that.

a reply to: theatreboy

I disagree.

We have our own problems as they have theirs.

Maybe Trump can help, but I hope it’s at home first.

If the Brits can’t figure out how to address their own plight, so be it. I’m sure another generation or two and Sharia Law will sort it all out for them anyways.

a reply to: Hecate666

The article has me needing to accept cookies to read it.

I ain’t doin it. But yeah. You’re probably right.

This is the kind of stuff anyone who voted for Kamala was basically supporting. This is literally what Kamala Harris and her media supporters wanted her to be able to do with speech in America.

The best way to help Britain is to lobby to make sure they re-open their markets to American firearms. We get a boon in business, they get a British revolution that should hopefully remove the Monarchs, the world will be happy.

a reply to: worldstarcountry

5th of November was yesterday.

And they ain’t got the 1A let alone the 2A.

So I expect disparaging looks and supposed sneers, and imagined passing of gas near police to be punishable by death in the next decade or so.

Also an interesting thought…if you can have your life ruined by simply looking at crime or yelling at police……


Why not go all in if your gunna be destroyed anyway…like I am sure at some point people are gunna stop yelling and well start doing other things…when they realize there is no difference in the eyes of the law between yelling and machete attack….. because in for a penny….in for a pound.

a reply to: gortex

a reply to: Athetos

I’d agree with you.

But that kind of out of the box thinking is racist and hurtful.

Hay it’s their rules I am only thinking along them.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

a reply to: gortex

Yet another outrageous sentence given at the behest of Two Tier Keir Stalin.

There is something seriously wrong when mothers get two years for shouting nasty words and nonces and the like get suspended sentences.

We don't need, or want, anything resembling The Second Amendment, what we need are politicians of conviction who are going to put the best interests and well being of the British people first and foremost and not pander to special interest groups or whatever 'cause' is de rigueur with the academia driven wokerati twats that are trying their best to ruin this country.

a reply to: gortex
I found this part of the Judges statement at best unneccesary,and and worst highly authoritarian and irrelevant to British law-

Passing sentence, Judge Jonathan Gosling told the 37-year-old defendant she was "clearly visible" in footage from the riot and was "recording the unfolding violence".

news.sky.com...

If being visible in public and recording violence-presumably with a phone or other sort of camera is illegal-How is it that all MSM reporters and cameramen who covered these events are walking free?

I'll tell you how they are free-Because neither being in a public location nor filming a crime in public are against the law in Britain.
The judge in his comments stepped outside of the legal framework.

The woman possibly did commit a crime if she actually shouted racially charged comments at police,but the recording in public should not have been mentioned.


Meanwhile did you see the vision of hell in Leeds last nite with hundreds of newcomers "celebrating bonfire night" by setting fires and launching fireworks in the streets while shouting you know what-
The leeds part begins at 16seconds-can you see any police?




Now a different group of people attempting to celebrate bonfire night with their young kids-NOW suddenly there are police-


Whats the difference?

a reply to: onestonemonkey

Not sure about “bonfire night” represents for y’all.

But the middle of the street seems a poor place for them.

In any event I’m not sure the “difference”between the two videos, other than God works in mysterious ways.

Pretty sure the “disparity is staggering” and “ancestral homeland” our racist terms. Plus the clapping by those well-behaved Brits in the park is super-triggering. Glad the police shut down that civil and peaceful celebration.

a reply to: gortex
As soon as I read the intro I knew that it was in GB. What the heck is going on over there? It used to be such a normal country. My condolences to you. So sad.

a reply to: Freeborn
you will never have those politicians again as long as they have nothing to fear from their servants errr constituents . You think Florida stayed free because of angry looks and words? No sir, we were ready to ... well I better not say it all but OSHA was going to burn on day one. which explains why the European Monarchs our subservient secret society agents of foreign governments are loyal to want to disarm America so hard.

Philosophy from Irwin Corey at the Village Vanguard: “You can get more with a kind word and a gun than you can with a kind word.”

Your ancestors gave you the answer to this kind of shenanigans back in 1776. For whatever reason, you all seemed to prefer being serfs who live at the mercy and pleasure of the Monarchs/Financial elite. A sensible politician will lobby to bring back British citizens rights to defend themselves from Tyranny. Remember Australia was the more recent of western nations to ban firearms/rifles , and it took less than a quarter of a century for them to lock up their citizens in concentration camps for refusing to be a medical test dummy for new experimental genetic engineering methods of the human genome.

They would not want me, I can start fires in record times in the most unusual of ways. Especially if I am in any place with electricity connected into the room.

Australia locked up people in camps, and Britain is sending people to prison for speech. Yea, it sure seems like getting rid of guns did these tax payers a whole world of double plus good!

a reply to: worldstarcountry

We were getting rid of despotic rulers centuries before the USA was even a thing.

We have saying around these parts 'You can't teach your father how to #'.

Keep your guns and Second Amendment, that's entirely up to you guys.....we neither need them or want them.

Person with multiple previous convictions takes 11 year with her to take part in a riot and then posts evidence of her self doing so online.

And they get jail time.

Amazing who would have thought it...