Biden-Harris Told Tech People HOW to Configure Dominion Voting Systems for Easy Cheating.

Friday, October 25, 2024

This bulletin from the Biden-Harris Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) purports to "ALERT!" state officials of their Dominion Election System "Vulnerabilities"...

This advisory identifies vulnerabilities affecting versions of the Dominion Voting Systems Democracy Suite ImageCast X, which is an in-person voting system used to allow voters to mark their ballot. While these vulnerabilities present risks that should be mitigated as soon as possible, CISA has no evidence that these vulnerabilities have been exploited in any elections.

Exploitation of these vulnerabilities would require physical access to individual ImageCast X devices, access to the Election Management System (EMS), or the ability to modify files before they are uploaded to ImageCast X devices. Jurisdictions can prevent and/or detect the exploitation of these vulnerabilities by diligently applying the mitigations recommended in this advisory, including technical, physical, and operational controls that limit unauthorized access or manipulation of voting systems.

Much more at: www.cisa.gov...

IN MY OPINION: Since this "bulletin" from the Biden-Harris administration says these numerous vulnerabilities have yet to be exploited, it stands to reason that the administration is using it to let technical people in the Election Fraud Organization (referenced by Joe Biden), know HOW to make vote manipulation easier for those who will flip votes on (or before) November 5th Election Day. 🚨

-WeMustCare 😎

Sneaky subtle subliminal suggestions in covert-code lingo 😎

It doesn't surprise me at all that the Biden Administration would inform the voting administrators of flaws in the system that can be used to hack the system instead of insisting all these flaws be fixed immediately before any further elections were held.

I am sure this information would be beneficial for some of the crooked people who would want to see their candidate win.

Fix the issues instead of informing the voting administration how to exploit them. The company who created the machines should be fixing the security issues they were not supposed to allow in the creation of the technology....

This proves that the machines can be hacked and it also opens up the issue of whether the last presidential election and other elections were valid. We have a lot of hackers out there that could have found these issues easily.

a reply to: xuenchen

Yep. The equivalent of telling the Fox which floorboards are loose under the chicken-coop.

originally posted by: rickymouse
It doesn't surprise me at all that the Biden Administration would inform the voting administrators of flaws in the system that can be used to hack the system instead of insisting all these flaws be fixed immediately before any further elections were held.

This proves that the machines can be hacked and it also opens up the issue of whether the last presidential election and other elections were valid. We have a lot of hackers out there that could have found these issues easily.

The Georgia Secretary of State (Brad Raffensperger) said 10 months wasn't enough time to implement the Dominion SOFTWARE-based safeguards and updates!

During a hearing, a lawyer for the state told the judge physical security elements recommended by CISA were “largely in place.”

But the secretary of state’s office has said a software update from Dominion is too cumbersome to install before the 2024 elections.

More at: apnews.com...

FYI: Georgia's Secretary of State and Governor (Brian Kemp) are accused of accepting $$$ kickbacks from Dominion Voting Systems, in return for giving them the $125,000,000 state contract. They have been in major CYA mode since Nov 2020.

So, two and a half years ago the CISA provides election officials, officials from both parties, right, that there are these discovered potential problems with Dominion machines. Got it.

The bulletin then lays out those problems that election officials should be on the look out for, again officials from BOTH PARTIES

The CISA then goes on in this bulletin, almost two and a half years ago, how to to about mitigating those weaknesses as seen at the end of the bulletin

CISA recommends election officials continue to take and further enhance defensive measures to reduce the risk of exploitation of these vulnerabilities. Specifically, for each election, election officials should:


Ensure all affected devices are physically protected before, during, and after voting.
Ensure compliance with chain of custody procedures throughout the election cycle.
Ensure that ImageCast X and the Election Management System (EMS) are not connected to any external (i.e., Internet accessible) networks.
Ensure carefully selected protective and detective physical security measures (for example, locks and tamper-evident seals) are implemented on all affected devices, including on connected devices such as printers and connecting cables.
Close any background application windows on each ImageCast X device.
Use read-only media to update software or install files onto ImageCast X devices.
Use separate, unique passcodes for each poll worker card.
Ensure all ImageCast X devices are subjected to rigorous pre- and post-election testing.
Disable the “Unify Tabulator Security Keys” feature on the election management system and ensure new cryptographic keys are used for each election.
As recommended by Dominion Voting Systems, use the supplemental method to validate hashes on applications, audit log exports, and application exports.
Encourage voters to verify the human-readable votes on printout.
Conduct rigorous post-election tabulation audits of the human-readable portions of physical ballots and paper records, to include reviewing ballot chain of custody and conducting voter/ballot reconciliation procedures. These activities are especially crucial to detect attacks where the listed vulnerabilities are exploited such that a barcode is manipulated to be tabulated inconsistently with the human-readable portion of the paper ballot. (NOTE: If states and jurisdictions so choose, the ImageCast X provides the configuration option to produce ballots that do not print barcodes for tabulation.)

So it seems to me with as little as I know about the ins and outs of election officials, that any Republican election officials who would have let this little scam slip by the attention of those in position to implement those mitigation steps are rather dumb people, knowing of course what everyone else in the country knows which is that the democrats intend to cheat.

Don't tell daddy or he will put them on his bad kid list.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Seems not only would this be a msg about how it could be done and that problems are there. But also opens the window to saying it was now hacked to allow Trump to win. I'd put my money, that would be course media takes and back to it being a totally secure election if the Democrats win.

a reply to: WeMustCare

Sounds like they used the old trick of making it "intentionally impossible" to make an effective repair, and I bet the "updates" have the backdoor cheat methods still there but camouflaged even better than before. 😬 CATCH22+ applied

a reply to: WeMustCare

IN MY OPINION: Since this "bulletin" from the Biden-Harris administration says these numerous vulnerabilities have yet to be exploited, it stands to reason that the administration is using it to let technical people in the Election Fraud Organization (referenced by Joe Biden), know HOW to make vote manipulation easier for those who will flip votes on (or before) November 5th Election Day. 🚨

-WeMustCare 😎

We all know that computers and software in general are vulnerable to hacking and reconfigurations.

In this case, it sounds like CISA could just be addressing "ballot marking devices" that could be improperly calibrated.

Allow me to explain. If you vote in person and your State has electronic voting, you will either fill out a paper ballot which will be inserted into a tabulator, or you will vote on a computer screen on a device called a ballot marking device, and it will produce a paper ballot. At least in my State that's how it works, and the ballot marking devices are mostly only used by people with disabilities, but anyone can use them. These ballot marking devices need to have their screens calibrated by the election workers any time they are powered up, at least that's how it was here when I was trained before the 2022 election, otherwise these devices can make it seem like people are selecting neighboring candidates, and because of this, I can see a potential for human error or abuse.

At least in my State, the ballot marking devices print out a ballot that can be checked by the voter, before being entered into a tabulator and being securely held for record keeping.

a reply to: IndieA

If you click on a few of the links in this "bulletin/advisory" from the Biden-Harris CISA: www.cisa.gov... , you'll see they take you to hundreds and hundreds of technical tricks for manipulating votes. Not just a fine-tuning of the screen to make it work better for disabled voters.

Am-I-Right?

a reply to: WeMustCare

Not to the layperson.

Also, the CISA report you linked is from 2022 and it looks like many of those vulnerabilities have been addressed, or at least were intended to be.

a reply to: IndieA

You're viewing things from the perspective that the Biden-Harris CISA is a good, well-meaning agency that wanted to make sure Joe was re-elected fair and square.

Never mind the fact that President Trump found CISA so "corrupted", he had to fire the top guy there after the Democrat's Nov 2020 steal for Biden.

Trump - Chris, you're fired: www.nbcnews.com...

NBC-ABC-CBS Loved Christopher Krebs, which is a huge red flag in itself!

But as Trump told judge Chutkan, he has classified Intelligence to reveal regarding the 2020 election hacking, if she can set a court date. Otherwise, he'll just declassify and reveal it if he's President next year.

😁

originally posted by: rickymouse
It doesn't surprise me at all that the Biden Administration would inform the voting administrators of flaws in the system that can be used to hack the system instead of insisting all these flaws be fixed immediately before any further elections were held.

I am sure this information would be beneficial for some of the crooked people who would want to see their candidate win.

Fix the issues instead of informing the voting administration how to exploit them. The company who created the machines should be fixing the security issues they were not supposed to allow in the creation of the technology....

This proves that the machines can be hacked and it also opens up the issue of whether the last presidential election and other elections were valid. We have a lot of hackers out there that could have found these issues easily.

I would think the existence of known vulnerabilities would demand an alternative solution to the voting system.

What do I know about free and fair elections though 🤷🏽‍♂️

a reply to: WeMustCare

You're viewing things from the perspective that the Biden-Harris CISA is a good, well-meaning agency that wanted to make sure Joe was re-elected fair and square.

Yes, I was playing devil's advocate and giving the benefit of the doubt, until evidence proves otherwise.

a reply to: Dalamax

I would think the existence of known vulnerabilities would demand an alternative solution to the voting system.

Or fixing those vulnerabilities, and at the very least, updating election software to meet current security standards (Georgia).

originally posted by: IndieA
a reply to: Dalamax

I would think the existence of known vulnerabilities would demand an alternative solution to the voting system.

Or fixing those vulnerabilities, and at the very least, updating election software to meet current security standards (Georgia).

LOOK was Georgia was planning www.abovetopsecret.com... , before SMART AGGRESSIVE PEOPLE forced it to be cancelled.

Perhaps the plan was an election day exploitation of the software and hardware vulnerabilities Biden-Harris's CISA was kind enough to describe in detail? (GEORGIA IS A DOMINION STATE)