Biden says of Trump: "We gotta lock him up."

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

And there is also the fact that Trump has been found guilty on felony charges

Yes, tried by a kangaroo court and sentenced by a far-left Trump-hating judge who actually donated to Biden's political campaigns. Banana republic all the way!

Judge Merchan Should Have Recused Himself Over Biden Donation

Wanna discuss the Biden crime family?

a reply to: ColeYounger2

No. I do not want to discuss the Biden family. This is a thread about party leaders using the term ''lock em up''.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

And there is also the fact that Trump has been found guilty on felony charges and still awaits sentencing on charges that could do just that, ''lock him up''. So right there Biden is right, like any criminal found guilty of multiple felonies a very valid choice to make in that sentencing should be to lock them up.

You've out done yourself Goof.

You do know that if he wasn't running for president with a very good chance of winning, none of those charges would have been brought against him.

Can you say election interference?

I understand your concern here yet even as far back as the Mueller report where it said that there were reasons to charge him though likely to difficult to impeach him at that time, it would be prudent to look into crimes that could be prosecuted in a criminal court. So yeah, of course the government would attempt to do that. And Trump? The best way to fend off those trials was to run for office again and claim election interference.

a reply to: BingoMcGoof


Too bad he didn't pursue this.

Wait, what?

Biden is still speaking, and that matters why?

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: BingoMcGoof

And there is also the fact that Trump has been found guilty on felony charges and still awaits sentencing on charges that could do just that, ''lock him up''. So right there Biden is right, like any criminal found guilty of multiple felonies a very valid choice to make in that sentencing should be to lock them up.

Too bad those very same charges are being looked at by the NY court of appeals! Would be a shame if those charges got nullified and the prosecution sanctioned over them. Then what would the tally look like? You and your ilk are too fascinated by appearance and not the actual ramifications of your actions. Also see the "nuclear option" and the filibuster!

a reply to: ColeYounger2

Yep, Trump in his prime. Didn't miss a beat. It was like a scripted joke, her, the setup and him, the punchline with emphasis on punch.Boom.

a reply to: hangedman13

I was starting to get worried there, almost a week without some one claiming that i had ilk.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: hangedman13

I was starting to get worried there, almost a week without some one claiming that i had ilk.

LOL FWIW you are kind of "ilky" and contrarian too and while I like that, it does rub some people the wrong way. I know some people just like to argue personally I had enough of arguing for a lifetime, but Id rather discuss the issues rationally and try and learn something semi-useful.

Otherwise, Ive should have better ways to spend my time

originally posted by: Boomer1947
a reply to: ColeYounger2

It was a joke.

He was being "sarcastic".

He was owning the conservatives.

He was quoted out of context.

Let's see, did I miss any Trumpian excuse?

He was telling the truth.

He will do whats best for the USA because he only wants what’s best for the nation. Revitalising the country after Brandon apent 4 years wandering around aimlessly telling anyone, real or imaginary, how his son is the smartest person he knows and encouraging violence in the land, foreign and domestic, to cover up his families criminal conduct.

There’s another couple for you to add to your list 👍 glad I could help and your welcome.

a reply to: putnam6

Yeah, I get the contrarian role. To me it is a course to independent thinking. That is what attracted me to this site in the first place. Holding out apart from the general consensus. At this time, holding out from the general consensus in this place is to pursue a critical stance on Trump.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: ColeYounger2

Yep, Trump in his prime. Didn't miss a beat. It was like a scripted joke, her, the setup and him, the punchline with emphasis on punch.Boom.

Trump wasn't joking though. He has spoken numerous times about Hillary's crimes, which always get whitewashed and somehow reduced to "ethics violations". Travelgate, Benghazi, and keeping thousands of state secrets in her personal email account. During the email scandal, Trump pointed out that a U.S. Navy sailor was jailed for taking pictures of the sub he was stationed on, while Hillary truly jeopardized the national security. (When Trump became prez, he pardoned him)

Crooked Hillary in action:

We were warned years ago about Biden being a mental case and will instruct violence at will. We've seen enough haven't we? 😁

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

You mean the doubly biased bueller gang? 🥥