It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Details he did not recall included participants in the meeting, any possible travel, or who was involved in scheduling it.
But when asked, "And if you billed for it, if you billed 8 hours for interview with D.C./White House, it's safe to assume that you would have taken part in the interview?," Wade replied, "Yes ma’am."
The transcript does not indicate what the meetings were about, including whether they were related to Trump.
originally posted by: matafuchs
I think we will see these happen in the coming days more and more. The game is close to over and the next stage, stopping the certification, is ready to start full steam ahead.
Wade said he did not know or recall information dozens of times throughout the course of the interview.
originally posted by: Boomer1947
a reply to: network dude
The 8-hour conference with "DC/White House" took place on November 18, 2022. Wade billed exactly $2,000 for 8 hours of attorney time at $250.00/hour. There was no billing for travel expenses, from which we can conclude that the meeting was probably held locally or possibly over the internet. November 18, 2022 was the same day that Special Counsel Smith was appointed to take over the Federal election interference case against Trump. The Federal case and the Georgia State case have a large amount of overlap, since they both resulted from the same criminal actions on the part of Trump. That means they would both use mostly the same witnesses and documentary evidence. Federal charges traditionally take precedence over State charges, so the State prosecutors needed to know if Smith was going to be interfering with the prosecution that Georgia State was planning. The White House was included because both Smith and Willis needed to know whether the Office of the President was going to claim Executive Privilege over any of the witnesses/evidence.
Coordination meetings between Federal/State prosecutors are normal when there is overlap between the two jurisdictions. In fact, Gov. Ron De Santis made sure that happened in the case of the assassination attempt against Trump in Florida.
And, of course, there is no law against State prosecutors talking to Federal prosecutors.
...with D.C./White House...
originally posted by: network dude
a reply to: WeMustCare
I hope folks are smart enough to realize that the lawfare against Trump failed, and all that money and time spent to jail him and tag him as a "felon" failed. He has been unhurt by it, and likely gained some support due to it. If he wins, his DOJ will fire Jack Smith, and reverse all the stupid. If he doesn't win, he's out of the political game, so going after him then will seem like such a tiny vindictive move, even the slow democrats will realize it. So there is no need to be concerned Trump will be jailed. There is concern with how connected the Biden admin is to the DOJ and state prosecutors that have going after Trump. Even after the election, those idiots have to be concerned with repercussions for illegal actions.
It's just Karma, it will come back around, always does.