The Mystery of NASA Jerry

Recently, a guy named Larry from NASA posted a few strange things on X before dramatically retracting everything and deleting it. Among other things, he posted some documents with diagrams, equations and formulas that seemed a bit crude at first glance. Then a user took a closer look and asked ChatGPT about it. The result can be read here, and it's quite fascinating (and very detailed). It's actually a pretty cool story, but it seems #ufotwitter doesn't care. Rightly so?

The Mystery of @NASA_Jerry
Let's say Jerry is not Larry. What are the documents?

First question: do we really know he is from NASA?

a reply to: ArMaP

The first link has an update near the bottom where they think they identified the mysterious Jerry. Can't say they got it right but their candidate seems to fit the profile of a guy who would be knowledgeable in the type of stuff this Jerry posted.

a reply to: malte86

I'm building that thing tomorrow any way!

But I know from a background check done decades ago by a Las Vegas writer on a site called "the Mothership," (or something similar) that Bob Lazar has not one official educational title to his name (they erased it, he sez), and was once a brothel handyman.

has anyone tried using the same information provided with ChatGPT to see if it gives out the same information? Then try it again but change the diagram in the article with that of a hamburger to see if it gives out the same information.

The hamburger image should be used since it resembles the wave front images shown in the article without making any sense to the article. If the AI makes the same claim with both of these and that response a lines with what was presented in the article, then the whole idea can be tossed out.

a reply to: CosmicFocus

if i had a fancy degree and only two jobs i could get were handyman at a brothel or flipping burgers at mickey d's, id go for being the handy man so long as i got some benefits.

Twitter account is AI pic so fake.
Larry Reed (and his papers) seem to be "real".

No comment on the validity of the content - although the "AG" excerpt I reviewed was very similar to some of the more speculative papers floating around out there.

Jury is out whether these types of papers are bleed off from some silo'd proprietary knowledge certain aerospace contractors retain- or just BS to confuse adversaries.

It looks like Larry did work at LM (bio here) - although I'm not sure his job title qualifies him for authoring Unified Field Theories.... and for some reason- none of his peers have ever cited any of his works.
If Larry is not real- someone has gone to a fair amount of effort setting up familial FB profiles to compliment the small amount of info available.

Suspect this could be another shot across the DoD's perception management boughs from the people who have had decades to plan such activities.

a reply to: malte86

OK absolutely not a Physicist, but I would go back and get that degree if I had to do it again. 1st Biology, then Chemistry became my life.

I see this diagram is about orbitals of an atom but cannot tell you much more than that.

When I was in college, we learned about Left handed and Right handed molecules made of the same ratio of the same elements. One thing, they often exhibit unique principles as taught in Organic and Biochemistry. My Physical Chem course work concentrated more on those type of formulas which we demonstrated in our lab test, and are currently a forgotten foreign language to me, if I saw these in my course work. I am not sure what they mean, but it is about orbitals and exciting electrons.

originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: malte86

I'm building that thing tomorrow any way!

But I know from a background check done decades ago by a Las Vegas writer on a site called "the Mothership," (or something similar) that Bob Lazar has not one official educational title to his name (they erased it, he sez), and was once a brothel handyman.

I am cool with that. This is a put up or shut up kind of world. When you know something is true but you don't know why yet, shooting the messengers should reserved until it is truly settled. Clearly, some one here on Earth has some kind of machine that kind defy our official "science laws". Why or whom is yet to be determined. The evidence to me is pointing toward a find at a geological dig revealed ancient concepts and here we are.

In the Bible, early on there is a verse that declares that there is "nothing new under the Sun". Only new to our understanding of what "is" means to borrow from Bill Clinton on trial.

a reply to: BernnieJGato

I don't see your point. Lazar claims that he was tapped by TPTB to investigate a captured UFO at Area 51 and has provide zero evidence--but the BS money is better than a handyman's.

originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: BernnieJGato

I don't see your point. Lazar claims that he was tapped by TPTB to investigate a captured UFO at Area 51 and has provide zero evidence--but the BS money is better than a handyman's.

Meanwhile, that must mean the actual footage of UFO's or whatever they are in those Navy videos are fake too.

was once a brothel handyman.

So CIA you say? 😉🙂

a reply to: CosmicFocus

Is there no one here who can read this stuff? I can't and I was hoping that that would be the focus. Things couldn't be going better for NASA...

Maybe this is the timeline where people like Titor are real. That is what this reminds me of. There have been a few odd things over the years.

a reply to: malte86

Wow! this was an amazing read! Thank you Speechify! I found this post to be very interesting read indeed! I don't claim to know all the math or science behind all these ideas presented in this article, but if just a fraction of this material is true, then we are more advanced than I originally thought as a collective species. I am somewhat of a geek when it comes to this subject matter, but only on a surface level. This is the stuff of Star Trek tech! I would absolutely love to experience this tech with my own eyes. This article explains that these technologies are highly theoretical, but based on the math explained here, it looks as though it could be possible to level up our reality.

a reply to: ArMaP

I don't know personally. Do you? Please elaborate. I guess it's nice to inject some healthy amount of skepticism onto a post. Nice job MOD!

originally posted by: GrumpyOlVet
a reply to: ArMaP

I don't know personally. Do you?

No, that's why I asked.

I have always been cautious about "great revelations", specially those that are linked to some older case (in this case, Bob Lazar), as that's an easy way of getting "traction".

Also, it's easy to pretend to be someone else on the Internet.

a reply to: ArMaP
Well that's a healthy dose of critical thinking there! idk i tend not to judge their motivations until I see some conflict of interest, then I will question motives. Not sure who he is, haven't really got the real interest to really know. I like the subject matter. I find it fascinating! Personally, I hope he's legit, so I will muse myself with it being true in the mean time.
Thanks for your response.

originally posted by: GrumpyOlVet
Personally, I hope he's legit, so I will muse myself with it being true in the mean time.

Not many people are brave enough to admit they use the Father Christmas rationale on UFO's.
For that I salute you.