Kamala Set A New Record

a reply to: IDELB2006

The networks "fact" checks were wrong..

She lied no fact check (no troops in a combat area).

that is a hostile environment.

Just because your "team" benefited doesnt make it anything other than hostile towards 1 candidate when a debate is supposed to be moderated impartially.

lastly she didnt answer a single question she word salads or lies every time she opens her mouth.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: xuenchen

I only saw the highlights of that Fox interview on Meidas Touch, but I’ll agree she screwed it up from what I saw.

But only because she did the exact same thing Trump always does, deflected the questions and just attacked her opponent. Anyone who watches Fox News and is looking for an alternative to Trumps toxic rhetoric would have been disappointed with that interview.

We must be in a alternate universe because I see Trump answer questions all the time without deflecting. Have you heard him on all the podcast recently? He answers all the questions and then some.

He also originally tried to get Harris to agree to a total of 3 debates but she backed down and said she only wanted to do the abc one, do you not remember that? She was afraid of a debate on FOX. Not surprisingly it seems like you’ve conveniently forgot this and left it out of your lil narrative.

You lefty’s are always talking about Fox News like it some kind of gotcha moment, I don’t get it? I see it to be less skewed and more honest in terms of journalism than any of the left wing networks. Maybe that’s why they often have more viewers than all the other networks combined? 🤷‍♂️

originally posted by: andy06shake
As to what my problem is. LoL

How long is a piece of string?

My problems are numerous and many mate but feck all to do with American politics if I'm honest.

I went golfing

Let me rephrase it. You tend to go with the first liberal volley of words and not follow up on it to see that maybe Trump was right, and the libs are just doing their normal anti-Trump thing.

Kamala Harris and her celebrity surrogates want to turn the entire country into Detroit.


Lizzo gets ripped online for saying ‘whole country will be like Detroit’ at a Kamala Harris rally


Is that a benefit?

I’m actually astonished that she could speak gibberish for that long. Wow.

a reply to: ARM19688

As a preteen, I remember learning to speak pig Latin so well, my bestie and I could hold full conversations in front of our parents and they could never catch up enough to understand what we were saying.

Maybe, Kamala is speaking to her besties and we're not fast enough to keep up?

Maybe she really is a genius?

Maybe?

Even though I would never vote for Kamala, I can see that anyone campaigning like that could get burnt out. Even if I were thirty years younger, I would be Exhausted from all that work campaigning. Democrats that blast Trump for being exhausted need to comprehend how much of a job campaigning like that is. It didn't bother Biden...he couldn't remember he had even made any speeches and didn't give a crap if he messed up...his staff had to make all the excuses for his screwups.

originally posted by: Irishhaf

lastly she didnt answer a single question she word salads or lies every time she opens her mouth.

Listening to a podcast they pointed out that when a question is asked to Harris she spends a long time saying nothing, then argues she is getting to a point and then just doesn't.

They timed one simple question that would have taken 15 seconds or less to answer. She was 45 seconds of nothing and then argued she was about to say the point that led to more back and forth of nothingness. When a person only has 25 minutes to ask her questions Harris can burn through those minutes and hardly have anything asked. This isn't some skill of hers, it is a lack of intelligence that shows.

I was thinking if I was interviewing someone who spent the first minute or two not saying anything pertaining to my question the interview would be over quickly.

a reply to: charlest2


Nuttin but a coward or maybe she was the one who is "exhausted" like she went off about Trump the other day 😂

Trump has so much energy he even put in some time at McDonald's at the fry machine while campaigning 🍟🍟🍟

originally posted by: charlest2
Kamala just broke another Guinness record.

Did MSNaziBC accidentally put up Kamala wins with 82 million votes?

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: JadedGhost

Why would Trump waste his time debating that silly woman whose campaign continues to crumble daily?

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” -Napoleon Bonaparte

Trump was going hard calling for more debates with Biden after the first one, yet his not interested in doing another with Kamala… why is that?

because he is winning and doesn't need to. If it was needed, he would do it. it's business, not a grand conspiracy.

originally posted by: Coelacanth55

originally posted by: xuenchen

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: Vermilion
a reply to: JadedGhost

Why would Trump waste his time debating that silly woman whose campaign continues to crumble daily?

“Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake” -Napoleon Bonaparte

Trump was going hard calling for more debates with Biden after the first one, yet his not interested in doing another with Kamala… why is that?

Because Kamala refuses to debate on FoxNews. She ended up screwing up the opportunity of a lifetime when did the interview. She could have locked up everything with simple answers to the simple questions. She blew it too by not going to the Al Smith Dinner where she could have had the audience eating from her hand if she had played it right. 😀

I wonder if maybe she's believing the leftist propaganda and is convinced that everyone on Fox is the devil and thinks it's smart to refuse to try to answer.

Most likely that is what happened. She was just playing to her base because in the leftist echo chamber, they think Fox is only watched by hardcore Trump people that she can't win over anyway.

In reality, the most hardcore Trump people don't watch Fox anymore. Lots of Independents and conservative Democrats watch Fox. She had an opportunity to reach out to persuadable voters and undecideds.

But, as usual, leftists are out of touch with reality and it causes them to make poor decisions.

originally posted by: KrustyKrab


You lefty’s are always talking about Fox News like it some kind of gotcha moment, I don’t get it? I see it to be less skewed and more honest in terms of journalism than any of the left wing networks. Maybe that’s why they often have more viewers than all the other networks combined? 🤷‍♂️

Not just more total viewers, but more Democrats and Independents.

Fox certainly has a rightward lean but it's not as hard as the leftward lean on the other networks. To modern leftists though, who think anyone who disagrees with them should be in jail. They don't even think the Democrat networks should have a token right-winger on now and then. It's too much. They just want 24/7 Democrat programming.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: JadedGhost

The problem with anybody thinking FoxNews is pro Trump is ludicrous.

They have at least a dozen regular big name stars on shows that are Democrats and they get away with more lies than the few Trump people do. Fox isn't pro Trump and definitely not pro Conservative. 😁

They are about 60/40 pro Democrat in total.

These idiots think Sean Hannity is on 24/7.

They can't handle hearing anything they don't like so they've never even bothered to put Fox on and see what it's like. So all they "know" is what they've heard from other leftists in their echo chamber, which is of course skewed.

The thing is, the other networks occasionally have pro-Trump guests on. But they are very strict that NO anchors, NO hosts, can be pro-Trump. They are ALL anti-Trump, without exception.

Fox has no such problem. They have pro-Trump anchors of course, but they also have anchors who don't support Trump. A couple examples:

Dana Perino, who is on in the mornings and sometimes the afternoon, is not a big fan of Trump because she worked for GW and Trump has been very hostile to him.

Neil Cavuto, hosts in the afternoon, is often critical of Trump and has been attacked directly by Trump for not giving him flattering coverage.

During the 2016 election cycle and most of Trump's presidency, Fox's chief of breaking news was ardently anti-Trump Shep Smith. He was choosing what stories Fox ran, and often editorialized on air about how much he despised Trump.

That entire time, leftists were falsely claiming Fox was extremely pro-Trump. In reality, their coverage was close to 50/50 positive/negative for Trump. They were the most down-the-middle coverage by far. The other networks were about 10/90 positive/negative for Trump. Extreme bias. Which is of course what leftists want.

The leftists are saying you can't believe Polymarket because it's "right-wing."

Which is just hilarious because they'll believe left-wing polls no problem.

But it's not just Polymarket now:



I still don't think the early voting data looks good for Trump though. Democrats are harvesting like crazy in MI, WI, and PA. Those are the only 3 swing states Harris needs to win. If Trump gets NC, GA, NV and AZ, Harris wins 270-268.

She was served up. I believe told she would have the win just like 2020. Remember no one would take the VP slot. They knew. We know. Donald Trump is going to win in a landslide.

They cannot cheat enough and it is just really getting to people.

HRC knew 2 weeks out they had a very very slim chance. I am sure she is reading that same internal polling.

All states right now are in play. This is not just about swing states.

originally posted by: matafuchs
She was served up. I believe told she would have the win just like 2020. Remember no one would take the VP slot. They knew. We know. Donald Trump is going to win in a landslide.

They cannot cheat enough and it is just really getting to people.

HRC knew 2 weeks out they had a very very slim chance. I am sure she is reading that same internal polling.

All states right now are in play. This is not just about swing states.

That's a mix of wishful thinking and delusions man. All states are NOT in play, that's just asinine to say. There are states like CA and HI he has absolutely no chance whatsoever of winning. IF Trump wins, it's gonna be by--at most--a few hundred thousand votes in a handful of states.

I'll gladly come back and eat crow in a couple weeks if I'm wrong. But ya'll were singing this same tune in 2020 and look what happened. And nothing was change to stop it from happening again.