It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Harte2
originally posted by: SprocketUK
Whats not to love?
Well, since you asked, what's not to love is listening to a grifter lying about archaeologists, lying about archaeological sites, and lying about archaeological consensus.
What's to love?
The cinematography.
Harte
While the excavated portions of the world are 0.000001% one thing we have learned is that civilizations leave massive archaeological footprints.
originally posted by: Hansllune
This lack of evidence is why Hancock changed his ideas and noted in his last book that the missing civilization had no technology but instead 'used their minds', meaning no artifacts, no use of resources etc....Thanks for the response
originally posted by: Xtrozero
I do believe there were waves of higher capable civilizations. We see this in the waves out of Africa where some waves had much better tools than past and future waves. If he goes down the path of minds only then I will stop watching.