It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
If they verify how many votes were cast before going to the counting areas, how can they possibly find the votes, at the next stage.
Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.
Makes for a rough day for the poll workers, but I dont see the problem.
Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.
originally posted by: YourFaceAgain
originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Kallipygywiggy
This also comes from the same judge that, within the last couple days, ruled that the " county election officials may not delay or decline to certify election results based on suspicions of fraud."
thehill.com...
Why not put safeguards in place to ensure that you can make the election come out the way you want it to?
Democrat judges literally making it illegal to decline to certify a fraudulent vote.
Democrat DOJ suing Virginia to keep fraudulent voters on the voter rolls.
Democrats LOVE voter fraud, and they're not even shy about letting you know anymore.