Georgia Hand Count Quashed

a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

Yea, we can't have too much transparency. Folks might see something they weren't supposed to.

BEFORE YOU POST.
READ THIS....

Important if Actively Posting

Be the Change you Wish to see... Redux





Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (Redux)

Community Announcement re: Decorum




These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.


To repeat, those who refuse to "get it" WILL face LENGTHY POSTING BANS!!
YOU are responsible for your own posts





And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
If they verify how many votes were cast before going to the counting areas, how can they possibly find the votes, at the next stage.

Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.

Makes for a rough day for the poll workers, but I dont see the problem.

Thats exactly all it did, which makes it easier to audit the totals down the road. If you were to find more votes from that precinct later, you would know where the issue is at.

It was nothing but an additional layer of security and the Democrats were against it from the get-go,

It only passed by a 3-2 margin and the losing Democrats pulled out their "we got more judges than you do" card.

Georgia Politics 101 really

IIRC the organizer of the bipartisan effort of the "Hand Count the votes" knew when the board's vote was so close all it would take was a sympathetic judge but this atleast shows Georgia citizens tried to make it more transparent and secure and our courts totally rejected the effort.

a reply to: putnam6

Folks really really need to pay attention to the judges where they live.

For 30 ish years I have complained in my circle that we have failed to keep the republic, things got to good so folks stopped paying attention and we let the crooks come to power.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.

The "problem" is that it's become quite common that in certain "swing" districts in the battleground states, more ballots are "counted" than actual people showed up to vote. Precinct "X" has 1000 voters registered to it. Precinct "X" tallies 2000 ballots. Who cast the extra 1000 ballots? And even more remarkably, all of those 1000 extra ballots registered votes for the Democrat candidate.

But to be honest, that's really "old" school. These days, the "voter rolls" are pre-seeded with non-existent voters (people) registered at vacant lots. The truth be told, with the voting procedures in place in the battleground states swing districts, it's really not even possible anymore to have anything other than a fraudulent outcome in a POTUS race.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

This also comes from the same judge that, within the last couple days, ruled that the " county election officials may not delay or decline to certify election results based on suspicions of fraud."

thehill.com...


Why not put safeguards in place to ensure that you can make the election come out the way you want it to?

Democrat judges literally making it illegal to decline to certify a fraudulent vote.

Democrat DOJ suing Virginia to keep fraudulent voters on the voter rolls.

Democrats LOVE voter fraud, and they're not even shy about letting you know anymore.

In return for being let out of prison, our former Illinois governor filled President Trump in on everything back in 2020. Part of the reason why he said "we caught them all."... And why they are all so panicky over him becoming president again.

a reply to: Cvastar

The ballots are added in between the polling station and the final talley station. Or brought in by truck to the final tally station. That is what we saw video of happening in Wisconsin and Michigan.

In Pennsylvania, the ballots were brought into the final counting station two days after the election and counted.. even though the supreme Court told them not to do so.

Secretary of State of Pennsylvania resigned but by then the damage had already been done and the state certified for Biden

Another bought-off "Judge" running for the rigging 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Let the cheats stand!!!!

a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

And if you venture to read some of those linked pages, you'll learn that nobody who counts things for a living thinks hand counts are more reliable. Machines are much more accurate, [b,]and faster to boot.

I'm old enough to remember when election counts were all in and every one was confident by the end of election night.... now it seems to take days.

Someone should tell the machines their counting to slow.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

This also comes from the same judge that, within the last couple days, ruled that the " county election officials may not delay or decline to certify election results based on suspicions of fraud."

thehill.com...


Why not put safeguards in place to ensure that you can make the election come out the way you want it to?

Democrat judges literally making it illegal to decline to certify a fraudulent vote.

Democrat DOJ suing Virginia to keep fraudulent voters on the voter rolls.

Democrats LOVE voter fraud, and they're not even shy about letting you know anymore.

And don't forget, if they succeed there will be more of this -

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Cvastar

The ballots are added in between the polling station and the final talley station. Or brought in by truck to the final tally station. That is what we saw video of happening in Wisconsin and Michigan.

In Pennsylvania, the ballots were brought into the final counting station two days after the election and counted.. even though the supreme Court told them not to do so.

Secretary of State of Pennsylvania resigned but by then the damage had already been done and the state certified for Biden

Thanks, yea......we've seen the same thing in Mayoral elections in Texas "Blue Zone" cities. It's really rather amusing when there's that weird announcement around about 1:00 am the day after the election when a blurb comes across the TV screen to the effect that "untallied" voting machines were "found" in XYZ county which must be unlocked and votes added to the tally. That typically only happens in "close" races, usually between two Democrats in a run-off election. Of course, as if by some weird magic, the candidate endorsed by the local Democrat newspaper is declared the winner.

The sad thing about all of this is that, at least in Texas, Republicans have long since moved away from and out of the cities following the "one county removed" rule to avoid annexation. Turnout in the Blue zone cities elections is pitiably low. I read somewhere that one of the Mayors of LA (California as an example) won with only 24% of the registered voters even bothering to vote in the Mayoral election.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

They are in it to win it.

And according to NPR their chances of winning are decreasing the closer we get to election day.

Anything goes.

Trump gains momentum in the election

Former President Donald Trump appears to be leading in the presidential election, according to NPR's latest analysis of the Electoral College map. At the end of August, Vice President Harris had leads large enough in three of seven closely watched states for them to lean in her direction, based on NPR’s analysis of polling averages at the time. Now, for the first time since Harris entered the race, Trump has taken over the lead in an average of the polls in the seven swing states. Click here to see the swing state map based on the polls.

NPR

This was on X discussing early voting in Georgia which was up huge over 2020 and many more Republican counties participating,

in 2020
Democrats were plus 11% over the Republicans now it's plus 4%, which would seemingly back up this from the comment section

x.com...

Hodgetwins
@hodgetwins
Kamala lost the black vote when she told us she washes her collard greens in the bathtub

Nasty ass bitch

SSN. Everyone has one. One vote per registered SSN. Remember, it was Trumps administration that wanted this and was sued by every Progressive Outlet there was.

Link