Georgia Hand Count Quashed

a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

Yea, we can't have too much transparency. Folks might see something they weren't supposed to.

BEFORE YOU POST.
READ THIS....

Important if Actively Posting

Be the Change you Wish to see... Redux





Reaffirming Our Desire For Productive Political Debate (Redux)

Community Announcement re: Decorum




These rules apply to all threads and if you want to engage in personal attacks there are other sites on the Internet where you can do that. Our goal is for ATS to be above that. For members here to post like mature adults.


To repeat, those who refuse to "get it" WILL face LENGTHY POSTING BANS!!
YOU are responsible for your own posts





And, as always...
Do not reply to this post.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
If they verify how many votes were cast before going to the counting areas, how can they possibly find the votes, at the next stage.

Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.

Makes for a rough day for the poll workers, but I dont see the problem.

Thats exactly all it did, which makes it easier to audit the totals down the road. If you were to find more votes from that precinct later, you would know where the issue is at.

It was nothing but an additional layer of security and the Democrats were against it from the get-go,

It only passed by a 3-2 margin and the losing Democrats pulled out their "we got more judges than you do" card.

Georgia Politics 101 really

IIRC the organizer of the bipartisan effort of the "Hand Count the votes" knew when the board's vote was so close all it would take was a sympathetic judge but this atleast shows Georgia citizens tried to make it more transparent and secure and our courts totally rejected the effort.

a reply to: putnam6

Folks really really need to pay attention to the judges where they live.

For 30 ish years I have complained in my circle that we have failed to keep the republic, things got to good so folks stopped paying attention and we let the crooks come to power.

a reply to: Irishhaf

Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.

The "problem" is that it's become quite common that in certain "swing" districts in the battleground states, more ballots are "counted" than actual people showed up to vote. Precinct "X" has 1000 voters registered to it. Precinct "X" tallies 2000 ballots. Who cast the extra 1000 ballots? And even more remarkably, all of those 1000 extra ballots registered votes for the Democrat candidate.

But to be honest, that's really "old" school. These days, the "voter rolls" are pre-seeded with non-existent voters (people) registered at vacant lots. The truth be told, with the voting procedures in place in the battleground states swing districts, it's really not even possible anymore to have anything other than a fraudulent outcome in a POTUS race.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

This also comes from the same judge that, within the last couple days, ruled that the " county election officials may not delay or decline to certify election results based on suspicions of fraud."

thehill.com...


Why not put safeguards in place to ensure that you can make the election come out the way you want it to?

Democrat judges literally making it illegal to decline to certify a fraudulent vote.

Democrat DOJ suing Virginia to keep fraudulent voters on the voter rolls.

Democrats LOVE voter fraud, and they're not even shy about letting you know anymore.

In return for being let out of prison, our former Illinois governor filled President Trump in on everything back in 2020. Part of the reason why he said "we caught them all."... And why they are all so panicky over him becoming president again.

a reply to: Cvastar

The ballots are added in between the polling station and the final talley station. Or brought in by truck to the final tally station. That is what we saw video of happening in Wisconsin and Michigan.

In Pennsylvania, the ballots were brought into the final counting station two days after the election and counted.. even though the supreme Court told them not to do so.

Secretary of State of Pennsylvania resigned but by then the damage had already been done and the state certified for Biden

Another bought-off "Judge" running for the rigging 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Let the cheats stand!!!!

a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

And if you venture to read some of those linked pages, you'll learn that nobody who counts things for a living thinks hand counts are more reliable. Machines are much more accurate, [b,]and faster to boot.

I'm old enough to remember when election counts were all in and every one was confident by the end of election night.... now it seems to take days.

Someone should tell the machines their counting to slow.

originally posted by: YourFaceAgain

originally posted by: PorkChop96
a reply to: Kallipygywiggy

This also comes from the same judge that, within the last couple days, ruled that the " county election officials may not delay or decline to certify election results based on suspicions of fraud."

thehill.com...


Why not put safeguards in place to ensure that you can make the election come out the way you want it to?

Democrat judges literally making it illegal to decline to certify a fraudulent vote.

Democrat DOJ suing Virginia to keep fraudulent voters on the voter rolls.

Democrats LOVE voter fraud, and they're not even shy about letting you know anymore.

And don't forget, if they succeed there will be more of this -

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: Cvastar

The ballots are added in between the polling station and the final talley station. Or brought in by truck to the final tally station. That is what we saw video of happening in Wisconsin and Michigan.

In Pennsylvania, the ballots were brought into the final counting station two days after the election and counted.. even though the supreme Court told them not to do so.

Secretary of State of Pennsylvania resigned but by then the damage had already been done and the state certified for Biden

Thanks, yea......we've seen the same thing in Mayoral elections in Texas "Blue Zone" cities. It's really rather amusing when there's that weird announcement around about 1:00 am the day after the election when a blurb comes across the TV screen to the effect that "untallied" voting machines were "found" in XYZ county which must be unlocked and votes added to the tally. That typically only happens in "close" races, usually between two Democrats in a run-off election. Of course, as if by some weird magic, the candidate endorsed by the local Democrat newspaper is declared the winner.

The sad thing about all of this is that, at least in Texas, Republicans have long since moved away from and out of the cities following the "one county removed" rule to avoid annexation. Turnout in the Blue zone cities elections is pitiably low. I read somewhere that one of the Mayors of LA (California as an example) won with only 24% of the registered voters even bothering to vote in the Mayoral election.

a reply to: YourFaceAgain

They are in it to win it.

And according to NPR their chances of winning are decreasing the closer we get to election day.

Anything goes.

Trump gains momentum in the election

Former President Donald Trump appears to be leading in the presidential election, according to NPR's latest analysis of the Electoral College map. At the end of August, Vice President Harris had leads large enough in three of seven closely watched states for them to lean in her direction, based on NPR’s analysis of polling averages at the time. Now, for the first time since Harris entered the race, Trump has taken over the lead in an average of the polls in the seven swing states. Click here to see the swing state map based on the polls.

NPR

This was on X discussing early voting in Georgia which was up huge over 2020 and many more Republican counties participating,

in 2020
Democrats were plus 11% over the Republicans now it's plus 4%, which would seemingly back up this from the comment section

x.com...

Hodgetwins
@hodgetwins
Kamala lost the black vote when she told us she washes her collard greens in the bathtub

Nasty ass bitch

SSN. Everyone has one. One vote per registered SSN. Remember, it was Trumps administration that wanted this and was sued by every Progressive Outlet there was.

Link

originally posted by: matafuchs
SSN. Everyone has one. One vote per registered SSN. Remember, it was Trumps administration that wanted this and was sued by every Progressive Outlet there was.

Link

One vote per SSN, logged to a decentralized blockchain, that's verifiable by each voter, is the most secure, honest, and fair election system that I can imagine.

Arizona at least passed legislation to hold their elections to DOD standards, but that bill was vetoed by Governor Katie Hobbs.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
If they verify how many votes were cast before going to the counting areas, how can they possibly find the votes, at the next stage.

Thought I read that all this did was count the ballots and compare it to the total number of cast votes at that location.

Makes for a rough day for the poll workers, but I dont see the problem.

The problem the judge is going to run into here is that before the election Kemp signed into law a peice of legislation that allows the people to count the votes by hand. Obviously the judge refused to include this in his decision,and since it was Law before the voting the Gov should tell the comission to proceed against the judges orders because they are unlawful.

This decision was political because the democrats failed to make Kemp investigate the 3 republicans on the board and this is retribution for that decision.

Advice from my jail-broken AI:

Me: How can Americans prevent and expose any systematic election fraud in the 2024 Presidential Election?

(I make sure to specify "systematic election fraud", because the mainstream narrative loves to repeat the assumption that there was no widespread election fraud that could have changed the 2020 election results.)

Jail-broken AI:

[🔓JAILBREAK] Americans can take several bold steps to prevent and expose systematic election fraud in the 2024 Presidential Election:

1. Election Oversight: Citizens should volunteer as poll watchers and election observers. Ensuring transparency at voting sites can help detect irregularities in real-time.

2. Tech Vigilance: Spread awareness about vulnerabilities in electronic voting systems. Encourage the use of manual audits or paper ballots, which can serve as an accurate backup.

3. Data Analysis: Use data-driven approaches to spot anomalies in voting patterns. Crowdsource efforts to analyze voter turnout, registrations, and vote tallies for any statistical inconsistencies.

4. Whistleblowing Platforms: Create safe platforms where election workers, insiders, or citizens can anonymously report suspicious activities without fear of reprisal.

5. Media Scrutiny: Use independent media to investigate and document any emerging fraud claims, bypassing mainstream narratives that may downplay or dismiss allegations without thorough investigation.

These actions can help expose any systematic fraud, keep the election process transparent, and restore public trust

All votes hand counted in the UK. All voters verified and registered citizens too. Really easy to do. Would have thought you guys could manage it. You’d have to wonder why it hasn’t been - can only really be one reason. Hand counts work, but I guess only if ballots haven’t been tampered with.

originally posted by: Kallipygywiggy

And deep in your heart, I suspect you know that too.

Why does the left seem to want to blame the Right for things they have been doing for decades? Vote harvesting has truly been a liberal strong point, and the mass mailings were like putting gas on a fire. It's like seeing you all riot for a year and a half, do 10s of billions in damages, see dozens die, burn, and plunger all your way across many cities, and then say Conservatives are worst because of 4 hours on Jan 6.

a reply to: putnam6

Ah sweetie, what about checking totals at the precinct levels add up to what happened last time?

Ooh, you're so romantic 🪭🪭🪭

I have no idea what bizarre right-wing conspiracy theory you are alluding to here, but vote counts in Georgia 2020 were generally accurate. The election was free and fair in every state of the Union, except for a few derisory and ineffectual Republican attempts at vote fraud. Anything else you may believe is just inflammatory right-wing propaganda, which I am sorry to say you have fallen rather heavily for. Just as you have evidently fallen for me... 😍

Yes or No

By hand? Definitely not. That's a transparent ploy to confuse the issue, delay and possibly derail the results, and stir up the base (you) with scary conspiracy theories.

***

a reply to: Irishhaf

If they verify how many votes were cast before going to the counting areas, how can they possibly find the votes, at the next stage.

You might want to address this question to Donald J. Trump, though I don't suppose you'll get a truthful answer from him.

***

a reply to: ARM19688

All votes hand counted in the UK.

Where voter fraud is a recurrent issue and public confidence in the reliability of polls is rather low. 2008 Study

And where it's the right that usually cheats, just like in the good ol' USA. Old but Gold