Raheem Mostert’s wife receives online hate, racism

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Agree to disagree.

You call them facts, I don't.

Other opinions are available.

All the evidence mentioned is out there but I can’t stop you from being willfully ignorant and ignoring it. There’s nothing I said that hasn’t been proven.

a reply to: Naftalin

I can't answer incoherent ranting?

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Just as I guessed, them them them. To me you sound as if anything said that does not strictly adhere to your own position must come from your perceived enemies. There is no sense in continuing with this so so long.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Yes there is, but insult away.

That's what you get for expressing an alternative opinion on a MAGA echo chamber, I guess.

a reply to: Naftalin

How grand you chose to chime in with a marvelously cultural rendition of '' he's living rent free in your brain'' stinger.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Yes there is, but insult away.

That's what you get for expressing an alternative opinion on a MAGA echo chamber, I guess.

For the record I never said that people weren’t violent. I said that in my first post to you that some took the bait. I’m just telling you there was more to it than that but you refuse to accept those proven facts of the incident. And yes, I think that’s willful ignorance on your part.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

Thanks. But not "proven facts".

Just your opinion.

Everyone has them.

Just as valid as yours.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Thanks. But not "proven facts".

Just your opinion.

Everyone has them.

Just as valid as yours.

Actually they have been proven facts. Prove them wrong.
It’s not a opinion.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

Other understand. You want coherent rant, I rant in rant section, with translator.

For the conveinience of you.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

You prove your "facts". Proving yours wrong is not how it works.

And you know it.

a reply to: Naftalin

Your translator isn't cutting it?

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Yes, I have this stupid habit of stating the obvious.

But since you can see it yourself, you could have done better from the start. But there's nothing you can do about fetish, I won't kink shame you.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

The moment you ridicule someone else's language is the moment you have already lost the argument

with or without a translator.

a reply to: Naftalin

Just stating a fact.

I don't actually understand your "argument"?

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: KrustyKrab

Thanks. But not "proven facts".

Just your opinion.

Everyone has them.

Just as valid as yours.

So you can’t prove them wrong, you just say they are not facts, okay.🙄. If the thread was about 1/6 it would have been spelled out for you already. But I’m not going that far off topic not to mention 1/6 has been beat to death on here, apparently you were absent that day? I’m sure a site search on 1/6 would give you all the receipts. And again it’s not a opinion.

a reply to: KrustyKrab

No. I watched it.

"Prove me wrong" is just ...wrong.

It is your opinion.

End of.

a reply to: Oldcarpy2

It's really simple.

Even over here in old Europe, we know that the US Democrats have no soul at all anymore. We also got a good look at it thanks to your US media, which wanted to sell us the hatred of Trump as a good thing.

I'm really not deeply involved and can't comment on it, but if one thing is obvious, it's that the US media, or rather those who control it, were scared #less of Trump. And still are.

Nowhere else in the history of the world has it ever been OK to show the severed head of a head of state in a highly frequented magazine and sell it as art. And even to cheekily ask whether it would be OK to blow his brains out.

Nobody, really nobody who still has brain cells left, can overlook or approve of that and go to bed at night, calling themselves a good person.

But I know that you're only asking so that you can now say: that's off topic. I've been reading along quietly for a few months now and haven't figured out whether you're that stupid or just pretending to be stupid. I suspect - because I don't want to offend you - that the latter is true.

And that explains a lot

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: SourGrapes

Colour me an idiot then.

Reaches for blue crayon….

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

The fact that your first thought is a twisted redirect to orange man bad, cultist bad kinda suggests you are not remotely objective.

The most likely culprit would be the cultists on the left, is it possible a trump fan decided to do it... sure and its possible the fae are real in ireland to.

I would love to hear some further thought on how you reached the conclusion that a trump person decided to DM her attacking her kids to throw suspicion at harris people?

She gains nothing by going public, could possibly hurt her husbands career by doing so I am more inclined to believe her side of things.

She says something against harris gets attacked online, kids get insulted, the simplest explanation would be some of those people on the left did it.

lastly yall that lean left love to pontificate about how stupid all conservatives are, yet constantly love to say these stupid conservatives are behind various conspiracies.

Yall really should sort things out.

originally posted by: Oldcarpy2
a reply to: Irishhaf

I don't believe this but just to point out that some on the right claimed that the January 6th thing was staged by BLM and Antifa activists, etc?

Jan 6th was a riot..

They recently admitted the FBI had CI in said riot and were inside the capital building.

Second hand information, guy my wife was in a training course in the military was at the capital and saw a bus full of people suddenly show up after trump was done speaking and shortly after their arrival the riot started.

Those two things make me question the official narrative.

Throw in the J6 committee deleting records, and refusing to allow some testimony to be public, it feels more like they are saying 3+3=17.