DOUG EMHOFF Will be First Gentleman if Kamala Harris is President - Things to Know About Doug.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I wonder what Jill thinks now that this is out in the open and more to come. 😀

Dr. Jill is looking forward to giving Dougie his next WH "physical".

a reply to: SourGrapes

What's blackmailable; we all know he beats women. You can only blackmail someone if their indiscretions are a secret.

a reply to: WeMustCare

I'm not judging her on her husband any more than I judge Trump on Melenia.

But this seems like a huge pot/kettle angle for Trump or supporters to use. It takes a degree of denial.

Trump is no fixture of fidelity either.
You don't fly on "The Lolita Express" 7 times because you care about the sanctity of marriage.

They all are prone to being lying rich people having affairs.

Trump gets prosecuted for it because he has hereditary #baggery in his blood. And does really disingenuous things that make people want to call him out.

He's so unwaveringly self-serving that it becomes some "law of attraction" cycle where he teaches the world to treat him a certain way.

He exudes that because he lives in a gilded world of double standards ignored, except when they turn against him.

He certainly didn't care about immigrants when his resorts need comstruction labor and his hotels need housekeepers.

originally posted by: Dandandat3
a reply to: SourGrapes

What's blackmailable; we all know he beats women. You can only blackmail someone if their indiscretions are a secret.

He is seen too much with Schumer and other leadership figures involving important legislation and policy meetings. If he has access to classified material (he does), then he's bankable. He's a lawyer and why would anybody think Kamala isn't keeping him informed on current classified decisions?

He's been right there during many Democrat celebrations like when a few big ticket Bills were passed. 😬

a reply to: Degradation33

Trump gets prosecuted for it because he has hereditary #baggery in his blood. And does really disingenuous things that make people want to call him out.

Disingenuous things?
Does that include cheating on your wife with the nanny, impregnating her and forcing her to have an abortion, and beating your girlfriend in public?
Asking for my anonymous friend “Doug”.

Trump was the devil for his indiscretions yet the back breaking water carrying for Harris’ husband is wild.
Can you even see what those double standards make you look like?

a reply to: Vermilion

No. I'm the one reversing the accusations on this one. You can't just reverse it back. I initiated DARVO in this thread.

I think any attack from the right on the character of the opponant is why the Bible has John 8:7. I mean MAGA is "praise the lord and pass the ammunition" incarnate. Yet the pious code of ethics is completely lost on Trump's campaign strategy. One might argue it amounts to using God for vanity, plus a constantly ranting finger. Trump only needs THAT to be Satan.

Like, "stop casting stones, political sinners!"

Sure Kamala sinned her way sometimes (insert Willie Brown kneepad joke). But people could at least get her husband's story right. It was his daughter's teacher, not the Nanny what got knocked up. And his first wife divorced him for it, which is what sometimes (usually) happens after exposed affairs.

The tabloid took some liberties (with "three anonymous friends" at a film festival) giving him the Chris Brown treatment. Daily Mail is still a tabloid, right? Low credibility? Where is the proverbial elevator video? She spun around, they say?

Confirmation bias and reductio ad deviares ad infinitum.

In desensitized 2024 "terminated pregnancy after affair with daughter's teacher" or "pimp slap" isn't as salacious as it used to be. Now, Trump's tastes would be if he was a democrat - because they are on record being his youngest daughters age in 2015 - but he isn't a democrat anymore, so they're excused.

It's humorous because, IMO, it's a very blind and hypocritical avenue of muck raking.

when someone shows you who they are, believe them.

I sometime enjoy the left showing me who they are. What a tangled web of deception they push. Its almost funny. Criminals in charge of the courts. Grifters selling blood for money.

Telling that Emhoff won't personally deny the allegations...but has an unnamed spokesperson do it for him.

Apparently, the three witnesses (at least 2 of them women and all close friends of the alleged assault victim) provided corroborating evidence to back up their story.

“I stand with women across every industry to say #TIMESUP on abuse" --Kamala Harris

“We need to take crimes against women and children more seriously — crimes like human trafficking, domestic violence, and child abuse,” --Kamala Harris

“Wore black today in support of all survivors of sexual assault or abuse. We won’t let them be silenced or ignored. #BelieveSurvivors,” --Kamala Harris

AND...as to the women who came forward to accuse Joe Biden:

“I believe them, and I respect them being able to tell their story and having the courage to do it,” --Kamala Harris

a reply to: CarlLaFong

Wow. So true.

a reply to: Degradation33

You’re right.

I wish Trump would just come out and say Montell Jordan was a bad lover and he wished he’d been the only one in his life already.

Ya know instead of a side piece.

But I digress as do you. This thread ain’t about Trump or Melania. It’s about the first potential First Husband and his past indiscretions.

Anyway. Carry on.

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

Okay. Back to topic and this DOUG EMHOFF exposé.

I think people (including me) are prone to agreeing with anything, regardless of credibility, if it confirms their bias and demonizes their opponent sufficiently.

Like people would take a 100 times peer reviewed and upheld scientific paper as "academia lies" if it said something they didn't like, while simultaneously upholding the least trustworthy of political fap rags as "true fact" if it agreed.

I find it unlikely that The Daily Mail, New York Post, The Gateway Pundit, or Washington Examiner could give me the true skinny... ever.



Though it's changed since 1994, now the words the NY Post adds into every headline are; "liberal", "transgender," "secretary of" and "corrupt".

Like "East and Gulf Coast Dock Workers To Strike Pending Contract" becomes "Corrupt Liberal Transgender Secretary of Transportation Causes Dock Worker Strike."

a reply to: SteamyAmerican

You are a member with integrity.

Thankyou. 👍

Statement from Emhoff's spokesperson...

Satire?: truthsocial.com...

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I wonder what Jill thinks now that this is out in the open and more to come. 😀

Dr. Jill is looking forward to giving Dougie his next WH "physical".

Yep. She will become a REAL medical doctor for performing that important task.

BTW...Have you seen the new book about Kamala Harris's achievements?

It's On Walmart Shelves: truthsocial.com...

Oct 7, 2024

Hillary whined about Men not liking her. Now Kamala will use that excuse for her loss next month...

NBC Says Harris Has ‘Big Problem With Men’ After Husband’s Masculinity Interview

Beyond this headline: dailycaller.com...

We're nearing a point where not enough illegal ballots can be produced to push Kamala over the finish line, like "they" did for Joe in 2020.

originally posted by: xuenchen
a reply to: CarlLaFong

I wonder what Jill thinks now that this is out in the open and more to come. 😀

I think she literally has her hands full changing Joe's diapers.

a reply to: xuenchen

That just suggests that he has information to be blackmailed for. Which is one half of the transaction.

However there is nothing with which to extor him over.

We all know he beats women and not enough people seem to care; so what exactly would the blackmailer threaten him over? To reveal something eveyone already knows?

a reply to: WeMustCare

The Democrats might want to refrain from labeling any man who disagrees with them as being misogynistic if they want make their gender gap problem smaller.

Calling people hateful names doesn't normally win them over to your side.

originally posted by: Dandandat3
a reply to: WeMustCare

The Democrats might want to refrain from labeling any man who disagrees with them as being misogynistic if they want make their gender gap problem smaller.

Calling people hateful names doesn't normally win them over to your side.

They should also pay their personal bills. EMHOFF and WALZ ate at a Cafe today, and left without paying their tab.

A microcosm of what they think of all of us: www.breitbart.com...