Could Kier Starmer actually be gay?

and hiding it?

Theres a hashtag blowing up on twitter right now called Queer Starmer, now ordinarily that might not mean much, but hot on the heels of the tens of thousands of pounds worth of free gifts from the gay Lord Alli, comes some couched allegations from people such as Isobel Oakeshott about Starmer's marriage being a cover marriage.

x.com...

Now, whether someone is gay or not is neither here nor there.
If you are putting yourself up to be head of state though and you cannot be honest about your own sexuality then frankly you have no business seeking power.

a reply to: SprocketUK

I watched the video posted by Gortex this morning.....I don't think he's gay.
The woman interviewed clearly states it has nothing to do with his sexuality.

I'm going with him being into swinging and/or dogging, perhaps a liking for BDSM.....and ok, maybe a little bit of botty sex thrown in the mix too! 🤣🤣

a reply to: Freeborn

Thank you for my next nightmares....

a reply to: Freeborn

Something like this perhaps? x.com...

a reply to: SprocketUK

Very good👍

a reply to: Freeborn

Epstein client?

P Diddy party goer?

Your home city just equalised, im sure you know

a reply to: SecretKnowledge2

I doubt he would be allowed anywhere near Downing Street if he was a nonce. Other positions possibly, but not PM.

I'm going with the whips, leather and gimp masks etc. (Not personally!)

PM for you mate.

a reply to: SprocketUK

Yes, very good.
Imagine the outrage if something like that was broadcast now.....too close to home for many.

a reply to: Freeborn

Every now and then there's someone bleating in the media about some of the stuff they did.

Thats the thing about comedy, you are pretty much always laughing at someone.

a reply to: SprocketUK

The fundamental basics of British humour is about taking the piss, out of each other and ourselves. And the closer to the knuckle to better. And we tend to see humour in any given situation.

If I was talented enough to be as funny as them I would be less PC and be pushing more buttons and boundaries than ever nowadays.

a reply to: Freeborn

Yeah, same and we'd both be sent off to the bloody gulag most likely.

I was rewatching some aint half hot mum's the other week and it struck me how it would blow a load of gaskets these days.

a reply to: Freeborn

Replied.

If i didnt have me crows this would be in me signature. Liberty taken...

I'm going with the whips, leather and gimp masks etc.

Like i said, liberty taken.
Like you also said, its about taking the piss

Slainte

a reply to: SprocketUK

And if he is? What of it?

a reply to: TheSemiskepticII

If he is, he could at least be open and honest?

But, I don't think he is.

a reply to: TheSemiskepticII

A picture paints a thousand words.
Labour party conference 24.

originally posted by: TheSemiskepticII
a reply to: SprocketUK

And if he is? What of it?

He should be dragged up to the top of the tallest mosque and thrown off it.

(For his dishonesty if nothing else)

a reply to: gortex

Yep, that definitely looks like a gay man kissing his beard.

I must admit I've been rather bemused, as a natural conservative with a small c, at the apparent media campaign against Starmer as an individual, because I don't see how anyone outside the Labour party themselves benefits from having him replaced by somebody else from the same party. Surely these attacks on Stalin are coming from Trotsky (as it were).

a reply to: DISRAELI2

I'm surprised you're bemused mate , Starmer is so full of inconsistencies it's easy to see why he is catching the flack.

Two months before he came to power in May this year.


His and his party's noses fully imbedded in Lord Alli's bountiful trough of cash also suggests why he is so keen to protect his "communities" over the natural British population.

I hope the "secret" doing the rounds at Westminster will be the final nail in his "sleazy nepotistic" ( Rosie Duffield MP) Reign.

A worse PM I have never known.

a reply to: gortex

Being an Irishman ive always had an eye on British politics.

A worse PM I have never known.

Always thought Thatcher was the worst.

But since the turn of the century, each one seems to outdo the previous one in absolute thick-headedness and yes, nepotism.

The Labour party was supposedly for the everyday person, i dont like using the term 'common'.

Now there is no difference in any party, over here too. They are all pricks, dont matter what side they're on.