N Carolina Election Board removed 750,000 voters 130,000 were deceased 290,000 were duplicates

BREAKING: The North Carolina Election Board just revealed that they have removed 750,000 names from the voter rolls, including 130,000 dead people and 290,000 registrations that were duplicates

for perspective, Trump won North Carolina in 2020 by 70,000 votes

x.com...

@BehizyTweets
BREAKING: The North Carolina Election Board just revealed that they have removed 750,000 names from the voter rolls, including 130,000 dead people and 290,000 registrations that were duplicates

This comes after Republicans filed a lawsuit, showing 225,000 names were unlawfully allowed onto the rolls because of a failure "to collect certain required identification information before the registration forms were processed."

This purge of exactly 747,274 is just the number purged in the last 20 months. So, I don't believe it includes the names challenged by the Republican Party, which means they still have hundreds of thousands more to remove.

How does a state of 10 million end up with almost a million ineligible registrations in the first place? In elections, sometimes separated by a handful of votes, having almost a million ineligible names on the voter rolls, plus rampant mail-in voting, is an Election Fraudster's dream.

originally posted by: putnam6

No, no,no,no AND no !
Otherwise, how can Democrats cheat to win ?

Think about their FWEEEEELINGS !!

Plus, Kamala campaigns so HARD to EARN the votes of the dead.....

a reply to: putnam6

Re: s3.amazonaws.com...

75% voter turnout in NC during a deadly pandemic (2020), is hard to believe, isn't it?

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: putnam6

Re: s3.amazonaws.com...

75% voter turnout in NC during a deadly pandemic (2020), is hard to believe, isn't it?

Well they did have 18% absentee and 65% one-stop early voting whatever that means

a reply to: putnam6

Maybe the people of North Carolina thought 1.6% inflation was "normal" and Biden-Harris wouldn't affect it.

Donald Trump could have done a better job of explaining what "They'll turn us into a Socialist country", really meant for American families in dollars and cents.


But then again, he likes for people to learn their lesson the hard way, so they'll remember their mistakes better.

Oh well.. we'll see if the "lesson" translates into a rejection of Biden-Harris-Schumer in 45 days, or so.

a reply to: putnam6

First of all, yes, we can agree that the deceased need to be removed from voter rolls. That's probably why it was made mandatory in The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 (NVRA), which was passed by about a 63% majority in both houses of Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton. States do the removals periodically, not necessarily continuously. Doing it right before an important election seems like a good idea.

North Carolina now has a voter ID law--you have to show a photo ID for your ballot to be counted. Presumably, that would filter out fraudsters voting twice or stealing the ID of the deceased who might have slipped through the cracks.

If you don't believe that, then you are saying that voter photo ID laws don't work.

So now how do they stop duplicate voting?

How do they stop mail ballot counterfeiting?

How do they stop the overseas absentee ballots from being duplicated and counted in districts that the people don't really live in?

😦

originally posted by: Boomer1947
a reply to: putnam6

First of all, yes, we can agree that the deceased need to be removed from voter rolls. That's probably why it was made mandatory in The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 (NVRA), which was passed by about a 63% majority in both houses of Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton. States do the removals periodically, not necessarily continuously. Doing it right before an important election seems like a good idea.

North Carolina now has a voter ID law--you have to show a photo ID for your ballot to be counted. Presumably, that would filter out fraudsters voting twice or stealing the ID of the deceased who might have slipped through the cracks.

If you don't believe that, then you are saying that voter photo ID laws don't work.

You are doing a hell of a lot of speculating there Boomer1947....

FWIW how each states do elections can ALWAYS be improved why make it harder by creating more work that could have been done in between elections

Im happy if a state has any form of voter ID #1 and #2 the FACT that the voter rolls are incorrect just creates more work and more chances for errors, and highlights flaws in how states hold elections.

For example, Florida in 2000 was governed by old voting laws that were vague and more so when lots of counties in Florida had much smaller populations harder to tabulate and audit. Here comes the dangling "chads" and a week or two later Bush was declared the winner when now there is decent evidence Al Gore actually won.

But after that, Florida got its stuff together and now runs a huge election with a huge diverse population and it goes smoother than a lot of states 2000 was the impetus to find different ways of voting as well

a reply to: putnam6

The fact florida will probably have a winner by 7 or 8 Pm election night and places like PA will need weeks to sort of give an answer is frightening to me.

originally posted by: xuenchen
So now how do they stop duplicate voting?

How do they stop mail ballot counterfeiting?

How do they stop the overseas absentee ballots from being duplicated and counted in districts that the people don't really live in?

😦

FWIW they don't stop it in most states at least, what happens is if the election is close enough and falls within certain parameters then states will go back and audit the votes, and thats where they catch the discrepancies.

and virtually every state has different laws, deadlines, and procedures.

With numbers like that, it is not even a maybe...that means our elected officials (as if we didn't know by their non campaigning, and horrible performance) are in their positions for whatever the reason is, but it sure isn't from being fairly and duly elected. That should ALREADY negate the results of the 2020 elections. We are literally talking about a problem far too easy to catch amd remedy for a country like the United States and is a glaring proof that our elections are a joke. The Biden Harris administration should have all of their actions canceled and whoever was in charge of SC elections should be put in prison. How embarrassing that our elections look even more a joke than those of some third world or communities country.

originally posted by: Irishhaf
a reply to: putnam6

The fact florida will probably have a winner by 7 or 8 Pm election night and places like PA will need weeks to sort of give an answer is frightening to me.

Exactly Irishaf and it's a perfect example of how states should respond to voting issues.

There's a reason the Democrats' Presidential candidate has won Florida back to back ONLY once since 1948 we have the Barrack backlash 2008-2012 but after that, the GOP is looking at 3 straight wins in the Sunshine State

a reply to: putnam6

And I for one would be perfectly okay with using US taxpayer dollars to track down and prosecute every single person who uses one of these names to vote! With the understanding that, if caught, you will spend no less than 20 years behind bars in a federal penitentiary and receive a non-reducible (i.e. no pleas to a lesser charge) FELONY for every count a person is convicted of. Or...a choice of permanent deportation from the United States and revocation of their US Passport for LIFE.

Voter ID still doesn’t stop 3am truck stops, suitcases, broken pipes , prefilled ballots and TDS BAMNers.

a reply to: putnam6

2000 was the last year Florida used punch ballots, that resulted in the 'hanging chad't...after that debacle where it seems like Dubya's brother who was governor of Florida likely helped his brother win.

The punch ballots were obviously flawed, and it could be confusing because of how one had to align the ballot to punch out the 'chad' next to their candidate.

Now they use computer scanned ballots with black marker used to fill in the bubble next to your candidate.

originally posted by: jrod
a reply to: putnam6

2000 was the last year Florida used punch ballots, that resulted in the 'hanging chad't...after that debacle where it seems like Dubya's brother who was governor of Florida likely helped his brother win.

The punch ballots were obviously flawed, and it could be confusing because of how one had to align the ballot to punch out the 'chad' next to their candidate.

Now they use computer scanned ballots with black marker used to fill in the bubble next to your candidate.

Im aware thus the "dangling chad" reference. The thing is with Florida in 2000 the voting reform was a bipartisan effort, both sides felt embarrassed at how unprepared the state looked. They politicians made the right decision and made sure the voting and tabulation process gets the funding and manpower deserved.

Don't quote me on this but IIRC I was reading an article contemporaneously they made more changes than the types of ballots they spent extra for more workers and pre-election training

The only reason we are seeing headlines like this lately is so that when Harris wins, it will look more legitimate. By releasing news like this they are taking away one of the main reasons people have to doubt the results.

Again, we all know they lie to us about everything, all the time. We all know that if news gets out about something, it's because they wanted it to in order to serve some purpose for them. And yet, something like this, or the narratives about the recent kill attempts, people latch on to it as if it must be true.