It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.

Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.

Thank you.

 

Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.

 

N Carolina Election Board removed 750,000 voters 130,000 were deceased 290,000 were duplicates

page: 1
10

log in

join
share:

posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 05:44 PM
link   


BREAKING: The North Carolina Election Board just revealed that they have removed 750,000 names from the voter rolls, including 130,000 dead people and 290,000 registrations that were duplicates

for perspective, Trump won North Carolina in 2020 by 70,000 votes

x.com...




@BehizyTweets
BREAKING: The North Carolina Election Board just revealed that they have removed 750,000 names from the voter rolls, including 130,000 dead people and 290,000 registrations that were duplicates

This comes after Republicans filed a lawsuit, showing 225,000 names were unlawfully allowed onto the rolls because of a failure "to collect certain required identification information before the registration forms were processed."

This purge of exactly 747,274 is just the number purged in the last 20 months. So, I don't believe it includes the names challenged by the Republican Party, which means they still have hundreds of thousands more to remove.

How does a state of 10 million end up with almost a million ineligible registrations in the first place? In elections, sometimes separated by a handful of votes, having almost a million ineligible names on the voter rolls, plus rampant mail-in voting, is an Election Fraudster's dream.



edit on p000000309pm096 by putnam6 because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 05:49 PM
link   

originally posted by: putnam6



No, no,no,no AND no !
Otherwise, how can Democrats cheat to win ?

Think about their FWEEEEELINGS !!


Plus, Kamala campaigns so HARD to EARN the votes of the dead.....

edit on 26-9-2024 by Tolkien because: (no reason given)



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 05:51 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

Re: s3.amazonaws.com...

75% voter turnout in NC during a deadly pandemic (2020), is hard to believe, isn't it?



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 06:06 PM
link   

originally posted by: WeMustCare
a reply to: putnam6

Re: s3.amazonaws.com...

75% voter turnout in NC during a deadly pandemic (2020), is hard to believe, isn't it?


Well they did have 18% absentee and 65% one-stop early voting whatever that means



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 06:17 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

Maybe the people of North Carolina thought 1.6% inflation was "normal" and Biden-Harris wouldn't affect it.

Donald Trump could have done a better job of explaining what "They'll turn us into a Socialist country", really meant for American families in dollars and cents.


But then again, he likes for people to learn their lesson the hard way, so they'll remember their mistakes better.

Oh well.. we'll see if the "lesson" translates into a rejection of Biden-Harris-Schumer in 45 days, or so.



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 06:18 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

First of all, yes, we can agree that the deceased need to be removed from voter rolls. That's probably why it was made mandatory in The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 (NVRA), which was passed by about a 63% majority in both houses of Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton. States do the removals periodically, not necessarily continuously. Doing it right before an important election seems like a good idea.

North Carolina now has a voter ID law--you have to show a photo ID for your ballot to be counted. Presumably, that would filter out fraudsters voting twice or stealing the ID of the deceased who might have slipped through the cracks.

If you don't believe that, then you are saying that voter photo ID laws don't work.



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 07:21 PM
link   
So now how do they stop duplicate voting?

How do they stop mail ballot counterfeiting?

How do they stop the overseas absentee ballots from being duplicated and counted in districts that the people don't really live in?

😦



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 07:34 PM
link   

originally posted by: Boomer1947
a reply to: putnam6

First of all, yes, we can agree that the deceased need to be removed from voter rolls. That's probably why it was made mandatory in The National Voter Registration Act Of 1993 (NVRA), which was passed by about a 63% majority in both houses of Congress and signed into law by Bill Clinton. States do the removals periodically, not necessarily continuously. Doing it right before an important election seems like a good idea.

North Carolina now has a voter ID law--you have to show a photo ID for your ballot to be counted. Presumably, that would filter out fraudsters voting twice or stealing the ID of the deceased who might have slipped through the cracks.

If you don't believe that, then you are saying that voter photo ID laws don't work.



You are doing a hell of a lot of speculating there Boomer1947....

FWIW how each states do elections can ALWAYS be improved why make it harder by creating more work that could have been done in between elections

Im happy if a state has any form of voter ID #1 and #2 the FACT that the voter rolls are incorrect just creates more work and more chances for errors, and highlights flaws in how states hold elections.

For example, Florida in 2000 was governed by old voting laws that were vague and more so when lots of counties in Florida had much smaller populations harder to tabulate and audit. Here comes the dangling "chads" and a week or two later Bush was declared the winner when now there is decent evidence Al Gore actually won.

But after that, Florida got its stuff together and now runs a huge election with a huge diverse population and it goes smoother than a lot of states 2000 was the impetus to find different ways of voting as well



posted on Sep, 26 2024 @ 08:05 PM
link   
a reply to: putnam6

The fact florida will probably have a winner by 7 or 8 Pm election night and places like PA will need weeks to sort of give an answer is frightening to me.




top topics



 
10

log in

join