GA Election Board passes resolution HAND COUNT at precincts to ensure totals match the machines

GA State Election Board passes 3-2 resolution 181-1-12-.12

HAND COUNT at the precinct level to ensure the totals match with the machines

The GA State Election Board’s decision for hand counts adds a layer of transparency to the electoral process, reinforcing voter confidence in the system.

they did not pass this requirement for mail-in voting?

loudobbs.com...

Additionally, requests for mail-in ballots are down 85%, another big win for Georgia's election integrity

a reply to: putnam6

This is only a count of total ballots cast and not a count of the votes cast.

If the machine says it has processed more or less than number of papers, there is a big problem.

It has nothing to do with counting the votes.

This should be applied for the mail in ones but the problem with that is it doesn't verify if the mailed in ones are valid or not.

Baby steps in the right direction.

China added votes for Biden on The Dominion machines in Arizona and Georgia in 2020.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: putnam6

This is only a count of total ballots cast and not a count of the votes cast.

If the machine says it has processed more or less than number of papers, there is a big problem.

It has nothing to do with counting the votes.

This should be applied for the mail in ones but the problem with that is it doesn't verify if the mailed in ones are valid or not.

Baby steps in the right direction.

I believe they had an early resolution that semi-addresses your concerns each machine MUST have a flash drive backup, if Im following you correctly

Is it perfect? no it is not, is it better than 2020? a lot better

a reply to: putnam6

Is it perfect? no it is not, is it better than 2020? a lot better

True and at least there is now the potential of showing the inaccuracy of Dominion Voting machines.

A good logical move by Georgia . Seems every state should do the same , its a good double check of the count just to be sure it's a semi honest election .

a reply to: putnam6

Good news for a change.

I'll take it where we can get it.

If only the historically blue states would do something for voter integrity we'd stand a better chance of electing the person we actually want in office, but that's unlikely to happen.

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: putnam6

Good news for a change.

I'll take it where we can get it.

Is it enough though?
I don't think so.
I think the Democrats will be a step ahead.
I am sure they realise that simple ballot stuffing and miscounts are not going to work as well this time around... hence the illegal alien invasion since day 1 of their administration.
They have planned for this.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
a reply to: putnam6

Is it perfect? no it is not, is it better than 2020? a lot better

True and at least there is now the potential of showing the inaccuracy of Dominion Voting machines.

A good logical move by Georgia . Seems every state should do the same , its a good double check of the count just to be sure it's a semi honest election .

ABC/NBC/CBS Evening News featured this story today. Each one described how it could really gum up the works in Georgia on election day.
-also-
Kamala Harris and the DNC are suing Georgia over another new law related to election integrity. It gives individual counties and precincts the option of NOT certifying their results if something seems "fishy"...not until an investigation is completed.

Source: thehill.com...

That is what MIKE PENCE was supposed to do on January 6, 2021....delay certifying the results until Senator Ted Cruz's task force had finished a 2-week supercharged investigation into AZ/PA/GA/WI/MI ballots and counting. But Pence colluded with Pelosi to push everything through, right after the protest ended that evening.

Can discrepancies trigger a court ordered recount??

😀

whatabout counterfeit mail ballots??

In unrelated news…

GA predicted to go Trump.

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: putnam6

Good news for a change.

I'll take it where we can get it.

Is it enough though?
I don't think so.
I think the Democrats will be a step ahead.
I am sure they realise that simple ballot stuffing and miscounts are not going to work as well this time around... hence the illegal alien invasion since day 1 of their administration.
They have planned for this.

I think where the D's messed up is that the two groups of people they can get to move to the US in mass are conservative by their very nature. Sure the Terrorist sympathizers of the ME living here are going to vote for their peeps in the Congress, but the rest of those with actual religious values are voting R because of the lefts Gay stuff alone. Same for the thugs that come from South America, they will likely vote Dem, but the Catholic families that brought their kids here aren't into Sex change surgery or supporting the drug cartels activity in their area. They will vote Trump in by a landslide even with the steal attempts if that metric holds true.

a reply to: putnam6

Sounds like a case of common sense.

originally posted by: pianopraze
In unrelated news…

GA predicted to go Trump.

a reply to: putnam6

FYI:

"The office of Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, a Republican, previously warned the GOP-run board that this move would likely be unlawful because state laws don’t allow local election workers to hand-count ballots before the votes are officially counted.

“These proposed rules are not tethered to any statute — and are, therefore, likely the precise type of impermissible legislation that agencies cannot do,” his office wrote.

Carr’s office also warned the board that it might be too close to the election to make these changes – and that judges might even block these changes because of long-standing precedents that favor maintaining the status quo on the eve of elections.

“The Board runs substantial risk of intruding upon the General Assembly’s constitutional right to legislate. When such intrusion occurs, the Board rule is highly likely to be ruled invalid should it be challenged,” Elizabeth Young, a senior attorney in Carr’s office, said in the letter on Thursday, warning the board that it might be overstepping its authority.

These conclusions echo concerns raised by [Republican] Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who has previously blasted the GOP-dominated board as a “mess.”

www.yahoo.com...

originally posted by: Boomer1947
a reply to: putnam6

FYI:

"The office of Georgia Attorney General Chris Carr, a Republican, previously warned the GOP-run board that this move would likely be unlawful because state laws don’t allow local election workers to hand-count ballots before the votes are officially counted.

“These proposed rules are not tethered to any statute — and are, therefore, likely the precise type of impermissible legislation that agencies cannot do,” his office wrote.

Carr’s office also warned the board that it might be too close to the election to make these changes – and that judges might even block these changes because of long-standing precedents that favor maintaining the status quo on the eve of elections.

“The Board runs substantial risk of intruding upon the General Assembly’s constitutional right to legislate. When such intrusion occurs, the Board rule is highly likely to be ruled invalid should it be challenged,” Elizabeth Young, a senior attorney in Carr’s office, said in the letter on Thursday, warning the board that it might be overstepping its authority.

These conclusions echo concerns raised by [Republican] Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger, who has previously blasted the GOP-dominated board as a “mess.”

www.yahoo.com...

Very aware...

and I also know nothing is EVER certain in Georgia politics, but we will see. Honestly, it will only matter in a close race, FWIW in 2020 Georgia had many requests for mail-in votes, and mail-in votes came in 3 to 1 in favor of the Democrats this year 2024 there have been 85% fewer mail-in requests all the while Georgia population is up, all of this historically bodes well for the Republicans.

for more perspective, Harris has a rally at Cobb Energy Center in Georgia and supposedly they have had to downsize it from the arena to the ballroom because they don't have enough attendees.

originally posted by: Justoneman

originally posted by: UKTruth

originally posted by: watchitburn
a reply to: putnam6

Good news for a change.

I'll take it where we can get it.

Is it enough though?
I don't think so.
I think the Democrats will be a step ahead.
I am sure they realise that simple ballot stuffing and miscounts are not going to work as well this time around... hence the illegal alien invasion since day 1 of their administration.
They have planned for this.

I think where the D's messed up is that the two groups of people they can get to move to the US in mass are conservative by their very nature. Sure the Terrorist sympathizers of the ME living here are going to vote for their peeps in the Congress, but the rest of those with actual religious values are voting R because of the lefts Gay stuff alone. Same for the thugs that come from South America, they will likely vote Dem, but the Catholic families that brought their kids here aren't into Sex change surgery or supporting the drug cartels activity in their area. They will vote Trump in by a landslide even with the steal attempts if that metric holds true.

I think illegal immigrants will vote for self interest more than where they sit on the Conservative / Liberal spectrum.
If Trump gets in , they are getting deported.
It would not be surprising for the effort to bring them in to be coordinated with military precision - where they are put and a managed process ot get on electoral roles with ID.

All Depends on Who's Counting.
Needs to be Done by Dems and Reps.
Only way to be a Fair Count.

a reply to: putnam6

a reply to: UKTruth

Trump should offer immunity and citizenship to all immigrants who turn in their enablers.

Get ready!! National Emergency looming!! Don't put it past Biden Democrats to copy THIS! 😃


Curfew Imposed In Sri Lanka Amid Vote Counting In Presidential Election

Police in Sri Lanka have imposed a nationwide curfew after voting ended in the country’s presidential election.

Authorities announced that the curfew will take effect from 10:00 p.m. on Saturday through 6:00 a.m. on Sunday.

Police announced the eight-hour curfew “in the interest of public safety.”

People have been asked to stay at home as the presidential election results are expected in the coming hours.