It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: SuiStoic
It is indeed not to late to implement election integrity measures.
I think any effort at all is an improvement over the 2020 election.
originally posted by: WeMustCare
originally posted by: SuiStoic
It is indeed not to late to implement election integrity measures.
I think any effort at all is an improvement over the 2020 election.
Having officials and judges who are HONEST is critical. A lot of potential ballot fraud was caught on tape, and also testified to by people in the Post Office, and Ballot Harvesting "whistle blowers". But those states had election officials and judges who are either lazy, or corrupted (bought off), or both.
We can help ensure that officials follow their own state laws, for one. In PA, GA, AZ, they did not follow all of them, and nobody at the top of the state, or the judges, had the guts to enforce them.
originally posted by: TinfoilTophat
a reply to: UKTruth
Since 2020, 41 million Gen Zers have reached voting age while 5000 to 6000 boomers died each day.
41,000,000 new young first time voters
7,300,000 dead boomers
The rigged numbers Republicans are so scared of are going to come from the Republican party's failure to win the youth vote.
Extracted from: dailycaller.com...
Former President Donald Trump called on Republicans to shut down the government if the CR with the attached SAVE Act doesn’t go through.
“If Republicans in the House, and Senate, don’t get absolute assurances on Election Security, THEY SHOULD, IN NO WAY, SHAPE, OR FORM, GO FORWARD WITH A CONTINUING RESOLUTION ON THE BUDGET,” Trump said in a Truth Social post on last week. “THE DEMOCRATS ARE TRYING TO “STUFF” VOTER REGISTRATIONS WITH ILLEGAL ALIENS. DON’T LET IT HAPPEN – CLOSE IT DOWN!!!”
so the party that wants to "protect democracy " seems pretty hell bent on getting any obstacles to there canidate winning off ballots or forced to stay on ballots in numerous states
The Nevada Democratic Party went to state court in June of this year, arguing that the signatures were invalid because the Green Party had used the wrong affidavit. On Aug. 12, the state trial court ruled in favor of the Green Party, but on Sept. 6 a divided Nevada Supreme Court reversed. It concluded that the attestation that the Green Party had failed to include “serves an essential purpose.” Therefore, the majority reasoned, allowing the Green Party to have its candidates on the ballot when it had not fulfilled all of the prerequisites to do so would nullify “the requirements that were put in place for the public’s benefit.” This is true, the majority emphasized, even if the secretary of state’s office made a mistake when it sent the Green Party the sample petition and affidavit. Despite that error, the majority insisted, the Green Party “still had a duty to comply with the legal requirements” for affidavits. The Nevada Green Party came to the U.S. Supreme Court on Sept. 13. Telling the justices that “[t]housands of Nevada voters who signed the petitions at issue are disenfranchised by the Nevada Supreme Court’s ruling,” it asked the justices to vacate the state supreme court’s order and reinstate the Green Party candidates. The secretary of state, the Green Party stressed, has acknowledged both that it gave the Green Party the wrong form and directed the Green Party to use that form. Moreover, the Green Party added, the secretary of state went through the entire process of counting and verifying the signatures without ever flagging the possible problem. To bar the Green Party’s candidates from the ballot now, when the party simply followed the directions provided by the secretary of state’s office would violate the Constitution’s due process clause, which guarantees fair treatment by the government.