Deagal revisited

Regarding the numbers of population decrease posited by the Deagal report , it was stated the analysis took in many factors but war was not one of them , it was stated that the extreme declines were based on economic factors. But they would say that being a semi secretive organization used by three letter agencies. The countries showing the worse declines have two things in common. The first being that they are NATO countries or heavily in the western alliance. The second being that they are the most vaxed countries using the new MrNA technology. The forecasts were for 2025. showing a massive drop off . For it to be accurate them some really Nasty stuff has to happen before 2025 . In this article it suggests that the population targets are well underway due to the vax rollouts. seemorerocks.substack.com...

The problem being a population decrease of the magnitude suggested would have to have full government connivence, a censorship of information previously unparalleled in the so called free countries. If the population decline was well underway we would see a great decrease in bods. on the street and a continuing economic decline unprecedented in modern times. Notwithstanding a clandestine body disposal industry to remove the newly deceased. At some stage we would see a lot of stuff for sale , but few takers as supply especially in housing would have overtaken demand. Then as the housing prices collapse so would the banks holding the dodgy loans.

With a drop in population of this magnitude at some stage panic would inevitably kick in and public order would remain a high priority at least until things stabilize again. The instigators might have to restrict free movement and control the information as a public order exercise something like fifteen minute cities? and of course be able to have total information with regards to dissidents likely to cause trouble as they were getting culled face recognition cameras or at least some sort of biometric id system which can't be faked. For the New world order it would be interesting to know what the deal was? because it could be argued that we seem to be seeing a few of these things rolling out.

F the Deagal Report!

Go Humanity!

a reply to: annonentity

People are dropping dead left and right. This poor lady just died at her desk at work and wasn't found for a few days! Because of the weekend I'm guessing? Poor lady. I can imagine few worse fates than dying in a cubicle at your job. Woof.

A 60-year-old Arizona Wells Fargo employee scanned into her office on a Friday on what appeared to be an ordinary workday. Then, four days later, she was found dead in her cubicle.

Denise Prudhomme, 60, was found dead on Aug. 20 in her office in Tempe, police said.

She had last scanned in the building at 7 a.m. on Aug. 16, a Friday, and there was no further scan in or out of the office, authorities said.

Tempe police responded to the Wells Fargo office in the 1100 block of West Washington Street after on-site security called about an employee they believed to be dead. She was pronounced dead at 4:55 p.m., police said.

The cause of death is pending determination by the Maricopa County medical examiner. Police said the preliminary investigation showed no obvious signs of foul play.

No obvious foul play. This article doesn't say it but another article I read I think from local news said that she was sitting at her desk, just dead.

www.nbcnews.com...

originally posted by: Shoshanna
Because of the weekend I'm guessing?

August 20th was a Tuesday! And she was declared dead at 4.55 pm on that Tuesday.

originally posted by: Shoshanna
Poor lady. I can imagine few worse fates than dying in a cubicle at your job. Woof.

Woof indeed!

a reply to: annonentity
I scan read the first link, and saw death percentages in the 70' and 80's (US/UK) by/during/end 2025. I'd not heard of these claims before, but we're all gonna know if/when it starts because of the high numbers!

I could imagine some bull# lockdown, internet/phone shutdown, etc, to try hide the deaths, but SO many people 'known' to be dying by next year...who the # enforces the lockdowns when the majority of cops are dead as well?!

It's top quality doom porn with a time frame tho!

a reply to: annonentity
As 2025 approaches,the deagle predictions have been coming back into my thoughts-although I still hope it was some kind of numerical error..

As we get closer to 2025-if there is to be a "deagle level event" my idea is that it will not be caused by covid or covid vax.
Yes covid and the vax has killed many-but nowhere near the numbers mentioned-The UK for example is set to lose approx 70% of its population.
Those numbers could not be acheived by any version of covid we have seen so far,and the vax will not IMO be able to kill such numbers in the few months we have left.
For a new disease or vaccine to hit the deagle numbers it would have to kill 7 in 10 people in the UK.
I may be wrong but I just cannot see that happening.

A nuclear war seems an obvious event which may result in the deagle numbers-but like you said,war was not one of the causes included in the predictions.

So I rule out covid and nukes.

I think it could be a mega quake/super volcano or series of them,or a meteor strike/shower,or an oceanic temperature event which sees vast amounts of methane released into the air.

All these could have global effects,and are all in the realm of being "nearly possible" for science to predict-but remember TPTB science is thought to be a few decades ahead at least-so they may know for certain something huge is going down soon.

Those are my serious theories-here is my wild one:

The deagle predictions are based on observations of an alien fleet which is being secretly monitired on approach to our solar system.
TPTB have information that the fleet will stop at Earth to refill its vast protein storage tanks.

Those predicted to die by deagle-ARE THE PROTEIN.

Bookmarked for later consumption.

a reply to: onestonemonkey

The problem with you suppositions is the geographical specificity. Any of the scenarios that you mention would have uniform consequences across the world (with, perhaps, the effects of nuclear war being an exception in terms of immediate effect).

You must note that it is western - and mostly NATO aligned - countries that have the greatest loss.

Interestingly, Mexico (which shares a long border with the US) sees a slight increase in population. This, I would say, eliminates the likelihood of a massive global incident such as a volcanic eruption or nuclear war being the primary cause.

As mentioned in the linked article, the direct correlation between countries with the greatest population loss and countries with the highest uptake of the mRNA death jabs seems a little more than coincidental.

:

a reply to: annonentity

The Deagel forecast has always interested me. I have seen dark days ahead for a long time. We have been on an unsustainable path for decades and all of the eggs are in that basket.

The article you linked merits a solid reading and I plan to do that post hate. A lot of good information. Thanks for sharing it.

The geopolitical specificity of the population decline is what most interests me. That convinces me that if accurate, it would have to be either a result of decisive military action or a fabricated health crisis.

With so many supposed diseases presenting (monkeypox, West Nile virus, EEE, etc.) I feel certain that most of the deaths attributed to these "new outbreaks" are actually the result of the mRNA death jabs.

2025 could be quite a trip. What's the old Chinese curse?

"May I live in 'interesting' times."

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke
It's time to move to Patagonia.

Think I'll start up a crematorium somewhere. I'll get rich.


When they cremate a body, do they sift out the gold teeth and give it back to the next of kin?

a reply to: annonentity

It would appear that the deagle.com site has been stripped even from the Internet Archive.

Weird

More and more women are declining to have children.

I think that has a strong affect on the population.

originally posted by: Tolkien
a reply to: annonentity

It would appear that the deagle.com site has been stripped even from the Internet Archive.

Weird

You misspelled the domain name. It's:

deagel.com...

It's still there. And it's on the Wayback Machine, but something weird in the way the address is formatted prevents it from beign properly displayed here. I'll see if this works:

web.archive.org...://www.deagel.com/

ETA: Nope, it didn't work. But it's still there. You just have to spell it correctly.

:

originally posted by: Annee
More and more women are declining to have children.

I think that has a strong affect on the population.

Certainly, but not that drastically and that suddenly. Women not having children cannot drop the population by 70% in a matter of a couple of years.

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: Tolkien
a reply to: annonentity

It would appear that the deagle.com site has been stripped even from the Internet Archive.

Weird

You misspelled the domain name. It's:

deagel.com...

It's still there. And it's on the Wayback Machine, but something weird in the way the address is formatted prevents it from beign properly displayed here. I'll see if this works:

web.archive.org...://www.deagel.com/

ETA: Nope, it didn't work. But it's still there. You just have to spell it correctly.

:

OOPS

My bad
Thanks

Found the Deagel 2025 population forecast, in pdf form, for those looking for it:

www.slideshare.net...

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: Annee
More and more women are declining to have children.

I think that has a strong affect on the population.

Certainly, but not that drastically and that suddenly. Women not having children cannot drop the population by 70% in a matter of a couple of years.

I am pro-science — I am not anti-vax.

NATO countries or heavily in the western alliance.

Meaning the women are more “Free to Be” and not forced to be breeders.

I think it’s more significant than you do.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: Annee
More and more women are declining to have children.

I think that has a strong affect on the population.

Certainly, but not that drastically and that suddenly. Women not having children cannot drop the population by 70% in a matter of a couple of years.

I am pro-science — I am not anti-vax.

NATO countries or heavily in the western alliance.

Meaning the women are more “Free to Be” and not forced to be breeders.

I think it’s more significant than you do.

Nothing to do with women being "breeders". Can your paranoid victim fantasies

Deagel suggest a 60%+ drop in population in the US and the UK by 2025
This can only occur so quickly due to a mass population death of some kind, e.g. war or mass disease or the like.


So, don't worry, your right to be a harlot is not being restricted.....see as many Johns as you like....

originally posted by: Tolkien

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: AwakeNotWoke

originally posted by: Annee
More and more women are declining to have children.

I think that has a strong affect on the population.

Certainly, but not that drastically and that suddenly. Women not having children cannot drop the population by 70% in a matter of a couple of years.

I am pro-science — I am not anti-vax.

NATO countries or heavily in the western alliance.

Meaning the women are more “Free to Be” and not forced to be breeders.

I think it’s more significant than you do.

Nothing to do with women being "breeders". Can your paranoid victim fantasies

Deagel suggest a 60%+ drop in population in the US and the UK by 2025
This can only occur so quickly due to a mass population death of some kind, e.g. war or mass disease or the like.


So, don't worry, your right to be a harlot is not being restricted.....see as many Johns as you like....

Rude

a reply to: AwakeNotWoke

The geopolitical specificity of the population decline is what most interests me. That convinces me that if accurate, it would have to be either a result of decisive military action or a fabricated health crisis.

It doesn't have to be neuclear war to take out two large countries. Think how far research has come since the days of nerve gas.
How about those Maui fires? Or the entire southern edge of Canada being torched at the same time.

Contaminate a country's entire water supply, take down the grid and/or entire infrastructure and let the ensuing chaos plus rapid spread of disease and famin do the rest.

Then we have those who believe military has the ability to create earthquakes. New Madrid, Cascadia and San Andreas all rupturing at the same time could do a pretty good number on America.

I'm sure I've left out a lot of scenarios from my bag of doom porn.