Is Kamala Good for America ?

Anyone that withholds evidence that would set a man on death row free should never be allowed to hold office.

I think Kamala would make 4 years of dementia joe seem like a sweet prosperous time to be alive.

originally posted by: Irishhaf

Anyone that withholds evidence that would set a man on death row free should never be allowed to hold office.

I think Kamala would make 4 years of dementia joe seem like a sweet prosperous time to be alive.

You got that straight.

Yet these America hating Liberal losers want her anointed so bad, they can taste it.

She is the defund the police, defund ICE candidate that will literally destroy the country.

a reply to: asabuvsobelow

You can ask that question without political differences? How?

Generalized answer:

She's good for America if you dont follow conservative news sources and terrible for America if you do. I hate to say it's gotten that basic, but it has.

She's a marxist or the one to stop Project 2025. Take your pick.

I will say, all the crap that is intended to sway an unfavorable opinion of her, is so out of context or divorced from reality (to me) I have a hard time viewing it as valid.

And that's locked in place.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

You can ask that question without political differences? How?

Generalized answer:

She's good for America if you dont follow conservative news sources and terrible for America if you do. I hate to say it's gotten that basic, but it has.

She's a marxist or the one to stop Project 2025. Take your pick.

I will say, all the crap that is intended to sway an unfavorable opinion of her, is so out of context or divorced from reality (to me) I have a hard time viewing it as valid.

And that's locked in place.

Perhaps you should research her political leanings then.

She's a Marxist and Agenda 2025 is a list of talking points that the left is trying to attach to Trump as a scare tactic for Democratic voters... even though he has nothing to do with it.

But if you would rather have a Marxist America than a Christian one, just move to an already Marxist country and live in that Utopia.

You are never going to change the fact that America is 70% Christian.

So much that Biden and Pelosi and others fake being Christian for votes.

originally posted by: Dandandat3
As an individual she's fine; relatively no better or worse than those politicians that came before her. If she does not do a good enough job there will be another election in 2028 and she can be removed.

Maybe. We're at a very critical time in the United States. Mark my words. This is the election that will cement our future one way or the other. We are all in.

a reply to: Loadandgo


It is critical.
Trump was rallying somewhere tonight and told people not to worry just vote this time. He'll have it fixed so you won't have to vote again. Uh...umm..uh..yikes?

Get out and vote just this time. You won't have to do it anymore. Four more years it will be fixed. It'll be fine. You won't have to vote anymore...In four years you don't have to vote again. We'll have it fixed so good your not gonna have to vote.”

Link to video

Is Kamala Good for America ?

No.

The end.

a reply to: Lumenari

Well, let's put the futility of that into context.

When Obama was president I did not consider The ACA as socialism. I saw a moderate that had some insurance companies make universal coverage still be partly-capitalism.

That's when I stopped paying attention to conservative media. Because they tried to tell me a person only slightly different than the Bush administration was a f*cking socialist and Satan incarnate. And if I didn't listen they just kept yelling it louder.

And when that happened, I'd say:

"I've used my free Healthcare. That was a lifesaver. Turned a 3 day stay into a $100 copay for ER admission. Thanks Kaiser! So why do you want me to vote for (the Republican) over the guy that saved me $28,000 once and who's impending plan paid for surgery. And your candidate wants to repeal the ACA?"

* I already had coverage, the passage of the ACA left our plan untouched and removed a retirement benefit in 2014. So it technically wasn't ACA coverage yet. I voted to keep it knowing the ACA kept my employer from dropping our coverage.

I still feel Obama did worse in people's heads. And also the $28,000 his "horrible socialism orchestrated by greedy HMO providers" could save me won my support.

He did something for me lately. And had the plan to keep that up.

So, different version of what socialism is as a starting point is worth consideration. Where others see commie/union crap I see a livable wage and a building middle class it seems like people want to fail when accomplished with higher taxes.

Like they said a $20 min wage would bankrupt people, lead to unemployment. Our rate has fallen slightly since April 1st. Now two full time fast food wages in a household tops 75k/year.

And we're even voting on Prop 32 in November which raises everyone else to $18.00/hour min wage statewide. And it's polling ahead because I guess not enough have complained that the price of a Chipoltle burrito bowl went up $1.50 yet.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: asabuvsobelow

You can ask that question without political differences? How?

Generalized answer:

She's good for America if you dont follow conservative news sources and terrible for America if you do. I hate to say it's gotten that basic, but it has.

She's a marxist or the one to stop Project 2025. Take your pick.

I will say, all the crap that is intended to sway an unfavorable opinion of her, is so out of context or divorced from reality (to me) I have a hard time viewing it as valid.

And that's locked in place.

Just listen to her speak ffs. She’s one of the dumbest people in politics and would be a major embarrassment to the country. I don’t think she’s qualified to be a Walmart greeter and people want to give her nuclear codes🤣

Fun fact…did you know school bus’s are yellow and she just loves venn diagram’s.

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: Imhere

lol

And still. . . . . no one on the left will unite with me.

They'd rather be divisive and a threat to democracy.

They’ll unite ya alright. On the stage from the Montel Williams show.

Rumor has it they’ll have you tied to a chair listening to “freedom” by Beyonce on repeat. While tickling your feet with a feather. Demanding you to start chanting “orange man bad”

lol ok I’m done

She’s just so intelligent 🤣

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
a reply to: xuenchen

Mongo say Kamala no Sheriff Bart .

And here I was thinking it was a ‘slamin salmon’ quote 🤣

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
Kamala Harris is an American Hating , Constitution hating , Jew hating , Police hating straight up Radical Marxcist.

Catholic hating. You forgot ... she hates Catholics too.
And she's a lying piece of crap. And as dumb as a box of rocks.

Having only read pages 1 and 10, I've no idea if this has been mentioned.

Diplomatic and international relations. How would her approach impact foreign policy? Would leaders of theocratic or other totalitarian nations and regimes respect her as president? Being a woman, how likely would she be seen as 'weak', by male autocrats?

There seems to be foreign media and pundit consensus out there that she will continue the Biden way on current conflicts and events. This suggests to me that nobody is sure exactly what her position is.

Is she a globalist? Does she support American exceptionalism? Hawk or dove?

Personally, I don't like the woman and don't trust her. I think she is marginally a better person than Hilary who I hold in contempt but that is hardly a ringing endorsement for her presidency. I think that over the last 4 years, she has behaved as though she is 'in charge' and if she were elected, I think we would see a burgeoning of her natural hubris from which, Americans and people of other nations would not fare well.

originally posted by: covent
Having only read pages 1 and 10, I've no idea if this has been mentioned.

Diplomatic and international relations. How would her approach impact foreign policy? Would leaders of theocratic or other totalitarian nations and regimes respect her as president? Being a woman, how likely would she be seen as 'weak', by male autocrats?

America -- leader of the free world -- is way behind in electing women to higher political positions including head of state.


List of elected and appointed female heads of state and government

The following is a list of women who have been elected or appointed head of state or government of their respective countries since the interwar period (1918–1939). The first list includes female presidents who are heads of state and may also be heads of government, as well as female heads of government who are not concurrently head of state, such as prime ministers. The list does not include Queens regnant who are heads of state (but not of government)

Khertek Anchimaa-Toka, of the mostly unrecognized and now defunct Tuvan People's Republic, is regarded as "first ever elected woman head of state in the world", although not in multiparty, free and fair elections. The wife of the nation's Supreme Leader, she is the first woman to be elected Chairman of a country. She became the chairwoman of the country's presidium in 1940.

The first woman to be elected as prime minister of a country was Sirimavo Bandaranaike of Ceylon (present-day Sri Lanka), when she led her party to victory in the July 1960 general election.

The first woman to serve as president of a country was Isabel Perón of Argentina, who served as the country's vice president and succeeded to the presidency in July 1974 upon the death of her husband.

The first woman elected president of a country was Vigdís Finnbogadóttir of Iceland, who won the 1980 presidential election as well as three subsequent elections, remaining in office for a total of 16 years, which makes her the longest-serving non-hereditary female head of state in history.

The first democratically elected female prime minister of a Muslim majority country was Benazir Bhutto of Pakistan, who led her party to victory in the 1988 general election and later in 1993, making her the first woman democratically elected leader of any Muslim nation.

The longest-tenured female non-hereditary head of government and longest-serving female leader of a country is Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh. She served as the country's prime minister from June 1996 to July 2001 and again since January 2009, for a combined total of over 20 years.

The prime ministers of Equatorial Guinea, Namibia, Peru, and Uganda are included in the list of elected or appointed female deputy heads of government but not in the list of elected or appointed female deputy heads of state, as they are neither heads of government, nor deputy heads of state due to the existence of the office of vice president in these countries, whereas the prime ministers of South Korea are included in both of those lists.

Currently, Barbados is the only republic in the world where both the serving head of state and head of government are women. Honduras, the Marshall Islands, Peru, and Tanzania are republics where the female President is the combined head of state and government.

en.wikipedia.org...

a reply to: Degradation33

You can ask that question without political differences? How?

It's pretty easy actually .

I examine her Character , Her Past actions, Claims, Statements , Her Record as Attorney General of California , Her performance as Vice President and Border Czar.

None of that has anything to do with her Political Affiliations or her Sex and Skin Color.

Yes she has been called a Marxist and for good reason . She is a Marxist it's not exactly something she is hiding.

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
She is a Marxist it's not exactly something she is hiding.

Define Marxist.

originally posted by: Annee
Define Marxist.

Kamala Harris.

originally posted by: Annee

originally posted by: asabuvsobelow
She is a Marxist it's not exactly something she is hiding.

Define Marxist.

Now that is funny .

I typed in Marxist on youtube and this was the third Video to pop up

That is a video of Harris Sponsored By Harris and it pops up directly if you type in Marxist on youtube.

Annee Define Constitutional Republic and then Define Capitalism . Now tell me the difference between A Constitutional Republic and Democracy ....

Democracy = Majority Rule . The Majority Rule of the Democrat Party is now focused on Marxism , they are not focused on the Ideals set forth by the people who founded this great nation . The ideals that made all of this possible . The ideals that allow you to hate the very country where you don't have to worry about State Police kicking your door in and knocking your teeth out for speaking your mind.

Go Speak your mind in China or Russia

originally posted by: FlyersFan

originally posted by: Annee
Define Marxist.

Kamala Harris.

Lame