Harris stresses rights, freedom in first campaign video

a reply to: marg6043

Wait until people start draping themselves in the flag, compare Kamala to Jesus, get all tatted up with her likeness, and state in court that they brought weapons to the Capitol and assaulted police, because they believe she called them there to "take back their country", before you liken the enthusiasm to a cult.

a reply to: xuenchen

How is it my fault that the reviews of those years do not find it a success? People may have thought it was, but The numbers show it was not. It maintained the previous President, slightly went up in areas before it was heading back down before covid. There was no great gains.

Again, I'm trying to go back on topic before I get a warning or posts removed. So I'll leave that subject as is now.

a reply to: frogs453

Soon my friend soon, kamala will be walking on water and will produce mana of thin air.

With all the millions of campaign money inundating the liberal media outlets everything is possible, after all no lipstick is going to turn the pig into a princess.

a reply to: marg6043

Very scary for you I'm sure.

originally posted by: ColeYounger2
As each day passes, I become more convinced that David Icke has been right all along.
There is a race of reptilian lizard people waging war on humanity.

Harris is more of a laughing hyena crossbreed?

a reply to: frogs453

Scare? why He Jinli, "kamala Chinese name that she adopted herself to kiss Asian butts, sadly Asians are not Orientals, once again she forgot her demography.

I am in a stage on my life that nothing scares me anymore.

a reply to: marg6043

Actually, what is that saying?

“The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of other people's money.”

This famous line by former British Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher reminds us that while government handouts may sound good, someone still has to foot the bill.

hudson.house.gov...#:~:text=%E2%80%9CThe%20problem%20with%20socialism%20is,has%20to%20foot%20the%20 bill.

What’s the national debt. And yes, Trump not taking more of a stance on the national debt is a pet peeve of mine.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: xuenchen

Here from the Economic Policy Institute: The Trump administration was ruining the pre-COVID-19 economy too, just more slowly

You can't be serious. You're posting a link from the far-left Economic Policy Institute? Of course they're going to tell you that "the Trump economy was horrible".

How about this? Actual inflation figures, by president, over the last 70 years. Real numbers, sourced by Investopedia.
(Investopedia is totally unbiased, politically)

Over 70 years, Trump's economy is the 4th best. Biden's is the 3rd worst. Real, factual numbers

a reply to: ColeYounger2

So it actually did go up from the prior President's number. He was given a low number and increased it before Covid. This President was given a high number, world wide due to Covid. It is now down, the CPI is 2.5 compared to over 8 in the UK. So he lowered the numbers.


From your link, they have another page on all of his policy, it's not the great rave you want. Investopedia

originally posted by: ColeYounger2

(Investopedia is totally unbiased, politically)

Well, that’s not entirely true. I’m sure they have a little sense and don’t think the economy runs on rainbow farts.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: marg6043

Wait until people start draping themselves in the flag, compare Kamala to Jesus, get all tatted up with her likeness, and state in court that they brought weapons to the Capitol and assaulted police, because they believe she called them there to "take back their country", before you liken the enthusiasm to a cult.

what weapons might they bring?

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ColeYounger2

So it actually did go up from the prior President's number. He was given a low number and increased it before Covid. This President was given a high number, world wide due to Covid. It is now down, the CPI is 2.5 compared to over 8 in the UK. So he lowered the numbers.


From your link, they have another page on all of his policy, it's not the great rave you want. Investopedia

It's precious Covid is an excuse for Biden, but you can't factor that in when talking about Trump. One of the reasons there are not serious people on the left.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: LSU2018

Who Trump with all his failed business deals? Good luck with that.

You have to admit Trump was a successful game show host.

That came in handy when he had to fire his cabinet picks.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: ColeYounger2

So it actually did go up from the prior President's number. He was given a low number and increased it before Covid. This President was given a high number, world wide due to Covid. It is now down, the CPI is 2.5 compared to over 8 in the UK. So he lowered the numbers.


From your link, they have another page on all of his policy, it's not the great rave you want. Investopedia

I'm not looking for a "great rave". The article you linked is an opinion piece, a critique on Trump's policies. While the author is very knowledgeable, the points he makes are debatable.

Once again, I'm talking real, actual numbers. A gallon of gas is 60-80% higher under Biden! Food staples like milk, eggs and butter are up 30%. This is not someone's opinion, but a fact. While we're discussing inflation, remember when Biden blamed it on Putin?

originally posted by: rickymouse
A time where no child lives in poverty? Well, if they persuade everyone to get abortions, no kids will be in poverty since there will be very few of them.

Has she actually given any solutions to our citizens problems, or is she just trying to slam Conservatives and make anyone who wants a normal kid brought up by their real parents look bad.

This is what I think is funny. Like..........anybody can say anything. I mean. We want all Americans to have the puppy or kitten of their choice and we want the pet food to be affordable. We want cheaper groceries. We are calling for affordable housing.

My favorite is that line "we are calling for affordable childcare"

Ok. How? They got nothing! And people eat this stuff up when they should be offended these politicians think they're dumb enough to believe this stuff. Im running on a rainbows and kittens platform. Everybody likes kittens and rainbows are just cool. Ever seen a double rainbow? Neat. Vote Sho 2024.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: xuenchen

How is it my fault that the reviews of those years do not find it a success? People may have thought it was, but The numbers show it was not. It maintained the previous President, slightly went up in areas before it was heading back down before covid. There was no great gains.

Again, I'm trying to go back on topic before I get a warning or posts removed. So I'll leave that subject as is now.

It's your fault for falling for the BS 😃
It's catchy isn't it.

originally posted by: frogs453
a reply to: marg6043

Wait until people start draping themselves in the flag, compare Kamala to Jesus, get all tatted up with her likeness, and state in court that they brought weapons to the Capitol and assaulted police, because they believe she called them there to "take back their country", before you liken the enthusiasm to a cult.

You forgot the wearing of diapers and t-shirts that say, "Real Women Wear Diapers!"

I think the best proof of the left not being like the right, taking up idolatry and engaging in cult like behavior, is the fact that they quickly got rid of their top person. It's not about the cult of personality, it's not about an idol. It's not about one single politician, it's about the movement.

The right just doesn't know how to do this. They are focused on personalities and what emotions those people can evoke out of them. They dig in, and keep digging in, until you can't get out any more. The dems got out of the hole and threw away the shovel as soon as it looked like it could become an issue.

originally posted by: Mahogani

I think the best proof of the left not being like the right, taking up idolatry and engaging in cult like behavior, is the fact that they quickly got rid of their top person.

The primaries are legally part of the election process,
this isn't the 1950's any longer. However it looks like
that (D) party does want to go backwards, taking away
the Democratic process.

How quickly you forget that for months and years
Joe was sharp as a tack. Until aunt Nancy decided
he wasn't. So your claim falls very flat.

Joe didn't just wake up one morning and hear the
voice of The Almighty God like he was waiting for.

Somebody did him.
This is far beyond a cult, it is Fascist.

a reply to: burntheships

The swamp fired him for no delivering Trump the way they wanted, queen pelosi is a very spiteful being. I got the ugly feeling that the swamp has not finish with Trump yet.