new look at TWA 800/what are some rabbit holes on the FBI vault site?/FBI ECAP

Im sure you all know that the FBI has a website vault.fbi.gov... where you can look at the

The Vault is our new FOIA Library, containing 6,700 documents and other media that have been scanned from paper into digital copies so you can read them in the comfort of your home or office. 

Included here are many new FBI files that have been released to the public but never added to this website; dozens of records previously posted on our site but removed as requests diminished; files from our previous FOIA Library, and new, previously unreleased files.

Now I did try to search on here and didn't come up with anything about this forensic analysis PDF so I am going to post this here and this is going to be a thread where as I am reading the 707 page forensic analysis available on the aforementioned website of TWA flight 800 I have converted this from PDF to image so if I find anything or have questions about something I will post the image of the PDF.

Here is a link to the TWA 800 page on the FBI vault website that contains the PDF vault.fbi.gov...

If you guys have any suggestions too of interesting stuff or rabbit holes on the FBI Vault website let me know!

PS: the FBI also has ECAP which is where they take parts from backgrounds of videos and ask the public to help identify the stuff/house/person/voice/tattoos etc. Here's a link for that, who knows you might recognize something that will help put a child predator behind bars!

www.fbi.gov...

a reply to: Shoshanna

Numerous eyewitnesses testified they saw a missile rising from the sea.
This WAS AN ACCIDENTAL SHOOTDOWN BY THE US NAVY.

The official explanation of a "center fuel tank explosion" has never occurred in any other 7474 before or since, in NO other Boeing, in NO other commerical aircraft, in NO other civilian aircraft,

IN NO OTHER AIRCRAFT IN HISTORY, MILITARY OR CIVILIAN, IN ALL THE HISTORY OF AVIATION !!!

Stop lying
Admit it was an accident by the US Navy
Pay the families
Stop being assholes.

originally posted by: Tolkien
a reply to: Shoshanna

Numerous eyewitnesses testified they saw a missile rising from the sea.
This WAS AN ACCIDENTAL SHOOTDOWN BY THE US NAVY.

The official explanation of a "center fuel tank explosion" has never occurred in any other 7474 before or since, in NO other Boeing, in NO other commerical aircraft, in NO other civilian aircraft,

IN NO OTHER AIRCRAFT IN HISTORY, MILITARY OR CIVILIAN, IN ALL THE HISTORY OF AVIATION !!!

Stop lying
Admit it was an accident by the US Navy
Pay the families
Stop being assholes.

You are mostly correct.

There has never been another central fuel tank explosion. That part is bullish#t.

A 747 with the nose blown off would not climb thousands of feet like the CIA claimed. That part is against the laws of Physics.

And many witnesses saw a surface to air missile climb up, fly out and blow up the aircraft.

But it wasn't a Navy missile. The witnesses described the first burn of the missile as being bright white, accelerating very fast, and leaving a smoke trail (as I recall). That is the signature of a solid fuel rocket motor booster. The second burn was much redder and slower. That's the signature of a storable liquid fuel rocket motor (Hydrazine). The US Navy didn't use storable liquid fuels back then. Still don't, as far as I know. The signature exactly matches the characteristics of a Soviet SA-2.

As a general rule, only nation state actors have access to sophisticated weapon systems like surface to air missiles. So it looks like some nation state actor with a grudge against the US set up a special operation. Who could it be?

I vote for Iran. They had SA-2s, and they had a score to settle after we shot down one of their air liners filled with civilians in 1988 as it was departing Tehran for Dubai. This was a tit-for-tat revenge operation.

IMHO

a reply to: [post=27412061]Shoshanna[/post

An old friend of mine was a flight attendant for American Airlines. At the time of the incident, her flight was on its way to Europe. Flight crews of many airlines often do their layovers at the same hotels, and the hotel was abuzz with some eye-witnessed accounts. She told me many times that some of the pilots witnessed the missile go up to strike flight 800. She said some of them later wanted to report what they had seen. Understand, these were seasoned, eye-witnessed pilots. But they were not called upon during the investigation.

A later incident in the news was also telling. An airline pilot actually stole some of the seating material to have it tested for explosive reside--which proved to be evident. He was arrested for thief, found guilty and went to prison for a time. The standard explanation for the tragic event still stands.

Don't ever believe that your government works for you. It works for itself first and always. Truth and justice are irrelevant as the need arises. Just ask 51 intel chiefs that signed the letter against Trump.

a reply to: CosmicFocus

Well they supposedly explained the positive explosive tests by saying that the day before the doomed flight, the plane was part of a training exercise for explosive detection dogs and that some residue got left behind that way from the training.

I think that might be BS! But I dont know.

I believe all the eyewitness accounts there are so many versus that video remember the debunking video either the military or CIA/FBI put out that just kept repeating it was a flare "not a missile". They repeated not a missile so many times if I was paranoid I'd think it was some type of brainwash attempt.

originally posted by: Boomer1947

originally posted by: Tolkien
a reply to: Shoshanna

Numerous eyewitnesses testified they saw a missile rising from the sea.
This WAS AN ACCIDENTAL SHOOTDOWN BY THE US NAVY.

The official explanation of a "center fuel tank explosion" has never occurred in any other 7474 before or since, in NO other Boeing, in NO other commerical aircraft, in NO other civilian aircraft,

IN NO OTHER AIRCRAFT IN HISTORY, MILITARY OR CIVILIAN, IN ALL THE HISTORY OF AVIATION !!!

Stop lying
Admit it was an accident by the US Navy
Pay the families
Stop being assholes.

You are mostly correct.

There has never been another central fuel tank explosion. That part is bullish#t.

A 747 with the nose blown off would not climb thousands of feet like the CIA claimed. That part is against the laws of Physics.

And many witnesses saw a surface to air missile climb up, fly out and blow up the aircraft.

But it wasn't a Navy missile. The witnesses described the first burn of the missile as being bright white, accelerating very fast, and leaving a smoke trail (as I recall). That is the signature of a solid fuel rocket motor booster. The second burn was much redder and slower. That's the signature of a storable liquid fuel rocket motor (Hydrazine). The US Navy didn't use storable liquid fuels back then. Still don't, as far as I know. The signature exactly matches the characteristics of a Soviet SA-2.

As a general rule, only nation state actors have access to sophisticated weapon systems like surface to air missiles. So it looks like some nation state actor with a grudge against the US set up a special operation. Who could it be?

I vote for Iran. They had SA-2s, and they had a score to settle after we shot down one of their air liners filled with civilians in 1988 as it was departing Tehran for Dubai. This was a tit-for-tat revenge operation.

IMHO

Possible.

But I just don't see how an Iranian ship equipped with a missile could get so close to US shores, fire a missile and get away without the US Navy noticing.

The US government would have been only too happy to blame Iran.


The only reason for a coverup is that this was (accidently) fired by a US military element.

But you're right.
Iran (or UFOs ; ) ) more probable than the center tank BS