posted on Jun, 24 2024 @ 11:28 AM
a reply to:
Ophiuchus1
I watched Accidental Truth last night and thought it was pretty good. One point it makes clear that anyone(s) who spends time and money researching ET
or developing advanced technology, are not likely to share their discoveries and advantages freely. So, what information are they actually pushing to
be disclosed?
So, I've been a bit of a skeptic with regards to ET and UFOs these last few years after the lack of disclosure, after learning about certain
disinformation programs like government funded crop circles in the UK, some of the new age BS, and the general lack of evidence of advanced
intelligence visiting Earth, but now I'm not so sure.
Due to some recent research into advanced technology, research into neuroscience, doing some work with minimally restricted AI, having several years
of mystical study and research, and generally being more opened-minded to new and old information, I'm questioning a lot of stuff right now, and
revisiting much more.
The documentary mentions that the government seems to have stopped their research programs into UFO/UAP phenomenon between 1969 and 2017, but maybe
things just went dark. This has me thinking about the story John Lear used to tell, which I'm foggy on. I remember him saying something about the
government possibly making a deal with ETs in the 60's that involved exchanging humans (for research purposes) for technology. Could there have been a
50-year agreement, or are we just coming to the end of programs that had 50-year classifications, and information about them, are now supposed to be
unclassified to the public?
Doesn't taxpayer funded research ultimately belong to the taxpayer? Maybe that's part of the the issue, the public could be due disclosure,
regardless.
Why are so many high level people, and Tom DeLonge, involved with seemingly pushing for disclosure while actually accomplishing what seems like very
little?