For 75 Years Cultural Marxism Worked to Destroy American Patriotism

a reply to: Myhandle

You do know all that stuff is blown way out of proportion or just some 4chan conspiracy theory right?

I remember reading something about this. the Soviet Union post-WWII realized that the Marxist / Communist brand was poison in the USA. So they--meaning the intelligentsia in Moscow and their tools in the US academic community--started directing their acolytes to the indirect approach. instead of openly espousing Marxism/Communism they would outwardly shun the labels ('card-carrying Communist') but do what they could to promote the ideology and policies from within. This is why Joe McCarthy went on about a list of communists in the State Department. much of the McCarthy Hearings saw outraged Marxists stoutly denying their Marxism, followed by the sympathetic media lauding them and trashing McCarthy (who was a Republican, after all).

so certain bright young men like Bill Clinton and Bernie Sanders took trips to Moscow in their college days; and we know what their politics are.

a reply to: Myhandle

Trafficking tunnels under synagogues? You do have a link for that I hope

originally posted by: MyhandleSorry, I don’t know any other group with child sex islands or trafficking tunnels under their synagogues.

Can it be the MSM don't publicize it as much? Can it be traffickers from other segments of society have fewer connections to famous clients? Could you really think only Jews traffic?

I wanted to start a thread but no longer am able to once ATS reset. I do not mean to derail or go off topic but the normalizing of degenerate behavior is what my post is regarding.

Normalizing destructive, immoral behavior: Amazon Prime series, The Boys. A series about chemically- created super “heroes”. A corporation, Vaut Enterprises, has more power than the Federal government. By injecting chemical substance, “V”, into infants, a mutation occurs and the children develop special abilities. And like a box of chocolates, you never know what you’re going to get. Some of the “Supers” are deranged. “Home Lander”, the head of The Seven, wears red,white & blue costume, he is to depict America. Season one was gross but excellent. Season two started showing some Woke/Fascist/Nazi leanings. Season three, which just came out a couple of days ago, is HORRIBLE.
The writers must be some LGBTQ flavors because they have zero sense of humour and pinned the audience against, well basically America, Trump and ATS.

Season 3 episode 1: Watch for yourself on Amazon Prime or the link provided and hopefully it works for everyone.

archive.org...

We shut it off and are done with the destruction of entertainment.




a reply to: ScarletDarkness

I lost most of my patriotism after realizing 9/11 was an inside job, they hoaxed a pandemic an stole an election. Fully black pilled now. The only proper way to fly an American flag is upside down or not at all as far as I'm concerned.

Excellent post.

A long read to be sure, but history and the tapestry it’s woven into sometimes requires explanations beyond a couple sentences. Or paragraphs even. Thank you for sharing this OP. Truly lays out “how we got here.”

a reply to: ScarletDarkness

normalizing homosexuality (LGBTQ)

Why do people have to be bigots? And so unAmerican?

a reply to: UnRepentantHarlequin27



I can't tell if your post is spam, or what it is. How does anything you said relate to the OP???

(I almost reported it until I saw you were actually replying to someone).

originally posted by: lincolnriley
I lost most of my patriotism after realizing 9/11 was an inside job, they hoaxed a pandemic an stole an election. Fully black pilled now. The only proper way to fly an American flag is upside down or not at all as far as I'm concerned.

I think we should remain patriotic, as the 1% hate Amercia and our way of life, they promote and fund flag burning (Antifa / BLM burned flags during their 'mostly peaceful' protests).

a reply to: ScarletDarkness

In addition it has been known for a long time that flying a flag upside down is to signal the nation in distress.

Not that you donated $ to Trump or think the trials are a shams. Or that the SC is all white power-based.

Or what we BS they are feeding the US public about its meaning any given moment now.

Or for that matter that burning the US flag is “expression” but BLM, ANTIFA, Or the Rainbow Unicorn Alphabet Mafia flag is hate speech.

a reply to: Hakaiju


Soros? You mean ole George Soros, that Marxist who pretended to be a capitalist so damn well that he did better at it then most ever dreamed and became a multi billionaire playing the capital system? That George Soros?

a reply to: BingoMcGoof

Isn't it obvious?? Of course it's none other than George Soros, the currency speculator who makes billions when other people LOSE. Surely you know this, right? OR, were you going to defend him?

How ironic is it when the "other" side figures out the people who fund them have ulterior motivations which are diametrically opposed to their own ideology. And, then the only thing left is to cling to that individual's actions in desperate hope that they will actually care about the plight of their victims. Hint:...they don't. Their only interest is in how much money they can make off of other people LOSING. (Sssssshhh, don't tell anyone, but it's called the "Short")

Sorry. Perhaps I misunderstood your direction, but I read your reply word for word, and took it at face value.

Did you mean something different?

a reply to: Solvedit

Marxism may have encouraged Rock & Roll and the Sexual Revolution.

Yeah, that was the way it was seen back then by conservative America, that anything that was different than the utopia that was set up for all to enjoy immediately after WW!! was due to the Commies.

Yeah, rock and roll. Teen agers who didn't want to listen to the music of their parents who were basically listening to the music that was recorded before they were born. Though it was not obvious to many at the time, music had been changing for decades.

Prior to recording devices and the eventual ability to broadcast music out of little electronic boxes, musical performance was almost a completely local phenomena. Children were raised with only the capacity to listen to music played by the people in their locals and that music was pretty much like the music that had been played for generations to their near ancestors. True there was written music like classical and stuff but most youth never got to hear any of that.

In the 1890s there was a musical revolution called Dixieland, a style of jazz that come out of the South. That gave way to Big Band Swing in the twenties and thirties, the music of that generation that fought in WW2. Their children wanted something else. This came on the heals of radio, the ability to broadcast music from those little boxes and music that could be recorded onto clay discs, sold in stores across the world and kept forever, as along as the disc did not break and if they had an electronic machine to play them on.

So the question arises here, was it the Marxists who invented the ability to record music? Was it the Marxists who invented the radio? The microphone, the speakers etc? I don't think so. But beyond that question was it the Marxists that sought out young people and promoted them to make new music? I think not. I think it was the good old American capitalists who found in those young people a new and developing market for whatever was resented to the. It wasn't the Marxists who developed RCA and Motorola and all the other corporations that built radios and record players, it was American Capitalist corporations that did so that they could make big profits from the up coming generations.

Was I Marxists who sought out new talent so that they could exploit their musical abilities to turn the youth to Communism? Me, I think not, more it was once again good the good old capitalist that sought out the next possible king of rock and roll to turn them into rich promoters. Man I could go on and on.

And the sexual revolution?

Once again more of the same. The sexualization of America's youth took a big step forward with movie houses. Big theaters where people could pay a nickel and watch bigger than life up on a screen. When talkies came about in the early 1930s the movies began to get so risque that the government put up morality sensors to keep them from getting to sexual and to a large degree, to not let young boys see to much of the female anatomy. But that failed.

Women were promoted visually as glamorous and sexy, watch any of hundreds of movies from prior to, though, and after that big war. Sex was heavily. Then of course there was the TV in the fifties and once again though there were censors, women were still displayed as pretty and lovely and sexy. And who was it that did all of that? The Marxists? Hell no, it was once again American capitalists working they way. MGM, American Artists, and how many more were making big bucks off of all this new technology.

And when one generation began to get tired of the same ol same ol, new for profit entrepreneurs came along with more and more stuff for the next generation and the next after that.

All of that playing upon the youth of America. Let's take a quick look at them ok? 'The morality of the 1950,s still held with that Victorian ethic of no sex until you were married. But by that time youth were not encouraged to get married until they graduated from high school. That would be around 18 or 19 years old. And even then it was held that waiting for the right person to come along and had the capacity to financially raise a family on one income was the way to ago. All of that layered over the ample FACT that both males and females under go puberty in their early teens. So this meant suppressing their natural physical desires for one, two, three, four, five, six and seven or eight years, all the while denying the presence of pheromones that drive people to mate and produce off spring from the moment of puberty.

So with the over lay of sexuality on display throughout the country in the capitalist movie houses for decades it's no wonder that the Sexual Revolution came about.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Maybe I did not make my point clear so I will give it another try. Soros, a Marxist?. NO. Soros the Capitalist. He is who he is but he is not, repeat , not a Marxist. My trouble here Fly is not so much in knowing how Soros works but in how we frame him, what over simplified camp to we associate him with. Associating him, as a bad guy, with Marxism, a bad frame is easy, but framing Soros, a bad guy with Capitalism is a realization I think we all might be better off understanding.

From the link in OP:
‘Television shows reflected sound, traditional values.

Where did it all go? How did that America become the sleazy, decadent place we live in today – so different that those who grew up prior to the ’60s feel like it’s a foreign country? Did it just “happen”?

... a strategy for destroying Christianity and Western culture, one that has proven all too successful. Instead of calling for a Communist revolution up front, as in Russia, he said Marxists in the West should take political power last, after a “long march through the institutions” – the schools, the media, even the churches, every institution that could influence the culture.“

My reply was based on that. “The Boys”, from Amazon Prime, Season 3 episode 1, is absolute trash. It resonates with the strategy to destroy the values, morales and civility of Western culture and Christianity.

Does that clear it up for you?

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: UnRepentantHarlequin27

I can't tell if your post is spam, or what it is. How does anything you said relate to the OP???

(I almost reported it until I saw you were actually replying to someone).

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
a reply to: Solvedit

Marxism may have encouraged Rock & Roll and the Sexual Revolution.

Yeah, that was the way it was seen back then by conservative America, that anything that was different than the utopia that was set up for all to enjoy immediately after WW!! was due to the Commies.

Yeah, rock and roll. Teen agers who didn't want to listen to the music of their parents...

Rock & roll appealed to kids. It may have been designed to result in a new generation who had no families or family traditions and had been created by kids who did not know who they were.

originally posted by: BingoMcGoof
So the question arises here, was it the Marxists who invented the ability to record music? Was it the Marxists who invented the radio? The microphone, the speakers etc?

Is that how far back they'd have to have started in order to have anything to do with it? The early rock & roll artists probably had to overcome plenty of resistance.

Companies may have jumped in on the bandwagon but you call them capitalists. Why couldn't they have been realist communists who talked and planned revolution but made money in the actual present system?

Aren't a lot of companies left leaning?

a reply to: Solvedit

If you want to believe that Marxists are behind rock and roll and those kids just didn't know it, why not also believe that Marxists are behind Trump and he just doesn't know it either.

a reply to: ScarletDarkness

Of course, for these 'cultural Marxists' to have been doing all this really nasty and controlling stuff, so successfully, for decades, it makes you wonder why no-one in charge didn't just stop it.

Are the right-whingers stupid?