Supercomputer Predicts Biden vs Trump Debate Outcome

Did the supercomputer watch the debate?

originally posted by: WeMustCare
Putting pieces of info together, we arrive at:

Candidate Trump's VP candidate will be in the small audience on 6/27/24 debate night. To keep CNN/Tapper from announcing who he/she is, candidate Trump will make the announcement before the debate begins...before his running mate arrives to the event.

Did this happen? Do we know who it is yet? Please Donalds. Can’t go wrong with a Donald Two for the price of one, this will be the economy in’24. Don’t duck the Donalds.

originally posted by: Kaiju666

originally posted by: WeMustCare
Putting pieces of info together, we arrive at:

Candidate Trump's VP candidate will be in the small audience on 6/27/24 debate night. To keep CNN/Tapper from announcing who he/she is, candidate Trump will make the announcement before the debate begins...before his running mate arrives to the event.

Did this happen? Do we know who it is yet? Please Donalds. Can’t go wrong with a Donald

Two for the price of one, this will be the economy in’24. Don’t duck the Donalds.

Donald Trump changed his mind, because he didn't Trust CNN or the Paparazi. (They follow him, but not Biden, LOL.)

originally posted by: Xtrozero
Did the supercomputer watch the debate?

It would have blown several fuses, because a Democrat coded the software.

a reply to: Xtrozero

It did , but then Broke Down due to an Electronic Schizoid Embolism ..............

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit
It did , but then Broke Down due to an Electronic Schizoid Embolism ..............

It got locked in one of Biden's logic loops for the next million years.

a reply to: Xtrozero

Truthfully Artificial Intelligence (A.I.) still can't do basic tasks correctly. I have a friend named Nathanael. He's in my contacts as Nathanael. But when I send him a text message, the "so called" A.I. spells his name Nathaniel.

I knew it couldn't. But if it would have been correct I would stand by the same statement. There simply was no logic that could validate it's 'prediction'.

a reply to: Mahogani

This OP didn't age well.