Preparation for the Endtimes Series - A motherlode of Conspiracy Theories

This is probably the best conspiracy series that I've seen, and I've seen a few. It also barely has any views on Rumble and YouTube (the channel has recently disappeared from YouTube FYI).

The series provides a lot of sources that you probably won't find anywhere else or haven't seen, even if you are on TikTok or Twitter. And it's all in one place.

I had nothing to do with the production of this series. It just seems like the person who made it is not interested in marketing it. I was hoping to see a discussion on Rumble but the viewership is too low for that.

So I am now here looking to have a discussion on these many, wild spurious claims that come with receipts. Debunk them if you can!

Off the top of my head, here are some of the topics discussed:

- Interdimensional Aliens/Demons and their meddling through the ages
- Anunnaki/Nephilim
- Nazis and their involvement in Antarctica/Underground civilizations near Tibet
- Biblical and Qu'ran prophecies and their tie-in to the present day
- Various religious figures like Jesus/Imam Madhi
- Ancient civilizations and their leaders. Ranging from Atlantis to Sumerian Kings like Gilgamesh (there is even a video of what the author claims to be Gilgamesh's finely preserved body that was found in the 2003 invasion of Iraq)
- Historical figures related to modern day (going back as far as 300-400 years ago) Satanism. Some names include: Alice Bailey, Alesteir Crowley, Helenva Blavatsky, and other names from the 1700's)
- Plans for the vaccine + the mark of the beast
- Lots of references to predictive programming (via pop culture)

It's a long series and there's much more that I'm forgetting to mention here. Check it out for yourself!


rumble.com...

Sounds too godly to me to click.
Demons, bibles, mark of the beast...yeah, not my cup of tea, Ilike my conspiracy theories less... erm, christian

To me the whole human made religion thing is a big conspiracy and not the nicest.

I'm less scared of demons than christians and their meddling.

So I won't be watching. I'm out.

I do like a good conspiracy theory so I will probably check ti out while I am working. Thanks for the share.

a reply to: Hecate666

I'm less scared of demons than christians and their meddling.

That was a good laugh...

originally posted by: Hecate666
Sounds too godly to me to click.
Demons, bibles, mark of the beast...yeah, not my cup of tea, Ilike my conspiracy theories less... erm, christian

To me the whole human made religion thing is a big conspiracy and not the nicest.

I'm less scared of demons than christians and their meddling.

So I won't be watching. I'm out.

Same here, easy pass for me. Once anything biblical or endtimes gets mentioned, the source loses all credibility for me.

I'm less scared of demons than christians and their meddling. - 100% this!

some of you may reject the supernatural
but billions of us accept these things.

we all act on our belief systems.
if you don't believe, not a bad idea to study what others do believe.

originally posted by: Hecate666
Sounds too godly to me to click.
Demons, bibles, mark of the beast...yeah, not my cup of tea, Ilike my conspiracy theories less... erm, christian

To me the whole human made religion thing is a big conspiracy and not the nicest.

I'm less scared of demons than christians and their meddling.

So I won't be watching. I'm out.

Seems like you have your mind made up. That's pretty crazy to me that you think Christians are worse than the devil. You're on this site, so I'm sure you are aware of some of the Satanic stuff going on.

Stuff that Wikileaks has confirmed, like the code words that Hillary/Obama used in their emails for the stuff they have done to little children. Or when Hillary mentions her worshipping of Moloch.

Or the blatant Satanic symbolism that we see in the entertainment field today. What about "spirit cooking"?

There's much more historical evidence that these people believe in Satanism, and they use it to sacrifice children. There are receipts in this video.

FYI, I'm not even religious myself - I just have an open mind with recent events that have come out

originally posted by: Coelacanth55

if you don't believe, not a bad idea to study what others do believe.

It's just a matter of less intelligence - those who are closed minded. When we have the ability to study all beliefs and be able to discuss anything, be willing/open to make changes if necessary, yet still hold our own beliefs, this is what being truly intelligent is. Sadly, not everyone can do that. This is why the masses are/have always been/will always be so easily controlled.

originally posted by: TruthJava

originally posted by: Coelacanth55

if you don't believe, not a bad idea to study what others do believe.

It's just a matter of less intelligence - those who are closed minded. When we have the ability to study all beliefs and be able to discuss anything, be willing/open to make changes if necessary, yet still hold our own beliefs, this is what being truly intelligent is. Sadly, not everyone can do that. This is why the masses are/have always been/will always be so easily controlled.

Yes I agree, glad someone here fits my definition of "open minded." There is always new information coming to light. If you stick with only one system of belief, and reject all others before listening to them, then you're probably quite small minded.

It's ironic that those who are anti-religion (for being so small-minded) are they themselves small minded.

a reply to: turdleton

This seems like a strange perversion of the truth. I'd agree I had ghost experiences and some other stuff, and am a reincarnation experiencer, but I myself am anti-theist. The context of this is religious claims and Bible prophecy.

Not believing in the legitimacy of that doesn't make you "closed minded". It just means you require proof that hasn't been availed to you. And being an Atheist doesn't mean you don't understand religious prophecies or claims. In fact, most USA atheists were raised on the Bible and know it front to back, so your statement about athiests not knowing or understanding the Bible is false and nonsensical.

If you'd merely said that mainstream famous atheists are closed minded about the supernatural in general, I could have agreed with that, but then you brought that out of context and took it to a weird place, as if trying to steal the flag and plant it somewhere it didn't belong.

What exactly are you arguing, actually?
I'm actually kinda confused.
Would you want to clarify what you meant?

originally posted by: turdleton

originally posted by: Hecate666
Sounds too godly to me to click.
Demons, bibles, mark of the beast...yeah, not my cup of tea, Ilike my conspiracy theories less... erm, christian

To me the whole human made religion thing is a big conspiracy and not the nicest.

I'm less scared of demons than christians and their meddling.

So I won't be watching. I'm out.

Seems like you have your mind made up. That's pretty crazy to me that you think Christians are worse than the devil. You're on this site, so I'm sure you are aware of some of the Satanic stuff going on.

Stuff that Wikileaks has confirmed, like the code words that Hillary/Obama used in their emails for the stuff they have done to little children. Or when Hillary mentions her worshipping of Moloch.

Or the blatant Satanic symbolism that we see in the entertainment field today. What about "spirit cooking"?

There's much more historical evidence that these people believe in Satanism, and they use it to sacrifice children. There are receipts in this video.

FYI, I'm not even religious myself - I just have an open mind with recent events that have come out

Yeah, there are some people who use the ideas of the biblical Satan to do ghastly things. These are the same kind of people who used to do and some still do, ghastly things using your god as an excuse.
It's really simple, there are bad people who use any manmade belief to get what they want.
Nothing to do with the medium they use at any given time.

Humans can be the cruellest animal on this planet.
They scare demons...

Well, after studying the subject for some time now I can tell you this.

According to scripture and some logic it seems the Apocalypse started sometime after WW2 and the creation of a state of Israel in 1948. Also it seems there's 3 time periods associated with it as well. A 70-80 year window. Then a 7 year window. Followed by a 3.5 year window. Like layers of a onion as you get to the middle. Then a 1000 year reign of the saints/day of Jezreel. So it would seem we're 76 years into the first layer. With the 2nd layer or the 7 year agreement of Daniel 9 occurring around 2026. And the 3.5 year layer starting around 2029. And I think I could make a good case for the 9-11 attacks being the event that marked the opening of the first seal of Revelation.

There's probably shreds of proof in what that guy is bringing up.

originally posted by: ntech620
Well, after studying the subject for some time now I can tell you this.

According to scripture and some logic it seems the Apocalypse started sometime after WW2 and the creation of a state of Israel in 1948. Also it seems there's 3 time periods associated with it as well. A 70-80 year window. Then a 7 year window. Followed by a 3.5 year window. Like layers of a onion as you get to the middle. Then a 1000 year reign of the saints/day of Jezreel. So it would seem we're 76 years into the first layer. With the 2nd layer or the 7 year agreement of Daniel 9 occurring around 2026. And the 3.5 year layer starting around 2029. And I think I could make a good case for the 9-11 attacks being the event that marked the opening of the first seal of Revelation.

There's probably shreds of proof in what that guy is bringing up.

Yes, this series goes back farther to the time of Albert Pike (and other names dating all the way back to the 1500's) - the man who predicted 3 world wars. The first 2 and their relation to zionism have proven quite accurate. It also purports that the 70 million deaths from WW2 were a sacrifice to the "god" Horus.

You don't have to believe in God or religion to watch the series, though it does help.

If anyone's seen the series, early on there's talk about Dhul Qhurnain, who the author says is Gilgamesh, and how he sealed a demonic portal in the North Pole with copper to prevent demons from entering our realm.

If you've seen the series, please speak up! I'd like to see what others think.

originally posted by: Hecate666
Sounds too godly to me to click.
Demons, bibles, mark of the beast...yeah, not my cup of tea, Ilike my conspiracy theories less... erm, christian

Don't worry, there's nothing truly "godly" or "Christian" about this form of conspiracy entertainment. It's just conspiracy entertainment targeting the market of counterfeit Christianity (Christendom) and other parts of false religion/Babylon the Great (as exemplified by also using the Qu'ran as a source for prophecies as mentioned in the OP, and some Imam).

Also, "the vaccine" has nothing to do with "the mark of the beast". Anunnaki/Nephilim is a staple in conspiracy entertainment. When discussing Nazis it is unlikely to mention anything of Christendom's support of and collaboration with the Nazis. Most of their leadership being members of Christendom (both Catholic and Protestant), just like those who voted for the Nazis. Germany's citizens at the beginning of World War II claimed to be 94.4 percent Christian. Adolf Hitler was a baptized Roman Catholic as were many of the leaders in his government, who never were excommunicated. In 1933 the Roman Catholic Church concluded a concordat with the Nazis. Roman Catholic cardinal Faulhaber wrote to Hitler: “This handshake with the Papacy . . . is a feat of immeasurable blessing. . . . May God preserve the Reich Chancellor [Hitler].” The Catholic Church and other churches as well became handmaidens of the evil Hitler government. Even though Jesus Christ said his true followers “are no part of the world,” the churches and their parishioners became an integral part of Hitler’s world. (John 17:16) As a result, they failed to speak out about the horrors against humanity that were committed by the Nazis in their death camps.

Catholic historian E. I. Watkin wrote: “Painful as the admission must be, we cannot in the interest of a false edification or dishonest loyalty deny or ignore the historical fact that Bishops have consistently supported all wars waged by the government of their country. . . . Where belligerent nationalism is concerned they have spoken as the mouthpiece of Caesar.”

When Watkin said that bishops of the Catholic Church “supported all wars waged by the government of their country,” he included the wars of aggression waged by Hitler. As Roman Catholic professor of history at Vienna University, Friedrich Heer, admitted: “In the cold facts of German history, the Cross and the swastika came ever closer together, until the swastika proclaimed the message of victory from the towers of German cathedrals, swastika flags appeared round altars and Catholic and Protestant theologians, pastors, churchmen and statesmen welcomed the alliance with Hitler.”

Catholic Church leaders gave such unqualified support to Hitler’s wars that the Roman Catholic professor Gordon Zahn wrote: “The German Catholic who looked to his religious superiors for spiritual guidance and direction regarding service in Hitler’s wars received virtually the same answers he would have received from the Nazi ruler himself.”

That Catholics obediently followed the direction of their church leaders was documented by Professor Heer. He noted: “Of about thirty-​two million German Catholics​—fifteen and a half million of whom were men—​only seven [individuals] openly refused military service. Six of these were Austrians.” More recent evidence indicates that a few other Catholics, as well as some Protestants, stood up against the Nazi State because of religious convictions. Some even paid with their lives, while at the same time their spiritual leaders were selling out to the Third Reich.

As noted above, Professor Heer included Protestant leaders among those who “welcomed the alliance with Hitler.” Is that true?

Paul Johnson’s History of Christianity said: “Of 17,000 Evangelical pastors, there were never more than fifty serving long terms [for not supporting the Nazi regime] at any one time.” Similarly, Martin Niemoeller, a Protestant church leader who himself had been in a Nazi concentration camp, later confessed: ‘It may be truthfully recalled that Christian churches, throughout the ages, have always consented to bless war, troops, and arms and that they prayed in a very unchristian way for the annihilation of their enemy.’ He admitted: “All this is our fault and our fathers’ fault, but obviously not God’s fault.”

Susannah Heschel, a professor of Judaic studies, uncovered church documents proving that the Lutheran clergy were willing, yes anxious, to support Hitler. She said they begged for the privilege of displaying the swastika in their churches. The overwhelming majority of clergymen were not coerced collaborators, her research showed, but were enthusiastic supporters of Hitler and his Aryan ideals.

True, a few courageous individuals from the Catholic, Protestant, and various other religions stood up against the Nazi State. But even as some of them paid with their lives, their spiritual leaders, who claimed to serve God, were serving as puppets of the Third Reich.

You'll never hear anything like that in documentaries about WWII in MSM (Discovery Channel, National Geographic, History Channel and such) just like you won't hear it in media productions by sources catering to the market for conspiracy entertainment. Just like the information below:

Part 21—1900 onward—Skirts Splattered With Blood (Religion’s Future in View of It’s Past; Awake!—1989)

...

Human Sacrifices to a False God

Since 1914, two world wars and over a hundred smaller conflicts have spilled an ocean of blood. A century ago, French writer Guy de Maupassant said that “the egg from which wars are hatched” is patriotism, which he called “a kind of religion.” In fact, The Encyclopedia of Religion says that patriotism’s cousin, nationalism, “has become a dominant form of religion in the modern world, preempting a void left by the deterioration of traditional religious values.” (Italics ours.) By failing to promote true worship, false religion created the spiritual vacuum into which nationalism was able to pour.

Nowhere was this better illustrated than in Nazi Germany, whose citizens at the beginning of World War II claimed to be 94.4 percent Christian. Of all places, Germany​—birthplace of Protestantism and praised in 1914 by Pope Pius X as home of “the best Catholics in the world”—​should have represented the very best that Christendom had to offer.

Significantly, Catholic Adolf Hitler found readier support among Protestants than among Catholics. Predominantly Protestant districts gave him 20 percent of their votes in the 1930 elections, Catholic districts only 14 percent. And the first absolute majority for the Nazi Party in state elections was in 1932 in Oldenburg, a district 75 percent Protestant.

Apparently, the “void left by the deterioration of traditional religious values” was greater in Protestantism than in Catholicism. Understandably so. Liberalized theology and higher criticism of the Bible were mainly the product of German-speaking Protestant theologians.

Equally significant is what finally solidified lagging Catholic support behind Hitler. German historian Klaus Scholder explains that “by tradition German Catholicism had especially close ties with Rome.” Seeing in Nazism a bulwark against Communism, the Vatican was not averse to using its influence to strengthen Hitler’s hand. “Fundamental decisions shifted more and more to the Curia,” says Scholder, “and in fact Catholicism’s status and future in the Third Reich was finally decided almost solely in Rome.”

The part Christendom played in both world wars led to a severe loss of prestige. As the Concise Dictionary of the Christian World Mission explains: “Non-Christians had before their eyes . . . the evident fact that nations with a thousand years of Christian teaching behind them had failed to control their passions and had set the whole world ablaze for the satisfaction of less than admirable ambitions.”

Of course, religiously motivated wars are nothing new. But in contrast with the past when nations of different religions warred with one another, the 20th century has increasingly found nations of the same religion locked in bitter conflict. The god of nationalism has clearly been able to manipulate the gods of religion. Thus, during World War II, while Catholics and Protestants in Great Britain and the United States were killing Catholics and Protestants in Italy and Germany, Buddhists in Japan were doing the same to their Buddhist brothers in southeast Asia.

Nevertheless, in view of its own bloodstained clothing, Christendom cannot self-righteously shake its finger at others. By advocating, supporting, and at times electing imperfect human governments, professed Christians and non-Christians alike must share responsibility for the blood these governments have shed.

But what kind of religion would put government above God and offer its own members as political sacrifices on the altar of the god of war?

“They Kept Spilling Innocent Blood”

...

originally posted by: turdleton
a reply to: Hecate666

Seems like you have your mind made up. That's pretty crazy to me that you think Christians are worse than the devil. You're on this site, so I'm sure you are aware of some of the Satanic stuff going on.

The person has 666 in their accountname while expressing a disinterest in Biblical prophecy, what did you expect? Something that makes sense?

Consider this: the Bible presents Satan the Devil as a real person (an individual, a spirit being) who is "the ruler of this world" (John 12:31) and "god of this system of things" (2Cor 4:4) "who is misleading the entire inhabited earth" (Rev. 12:9). I.e. a global conspiracy.

The corrupt state of human affairs bears testimony to the existence of a real Devil. The nations of this world let surplus food rot while their hungry populations starve. The nations store up weapons of mass destruction for mutual annihilation. They pollute earth’s environment. Yet, most people are blind to the source of such hateful, self-destructive behavior. Why?

The Bible reveals that Satan “has blinded the minds of the unbelievers.” (2 Corinthians 4:4) To manipulate humanity, Satan employs an invisible organization. He is “the ruler of the demons.” (Matthew 12:24) Just as a boss of an organized crime ring can run a large illegal empire without revealing himself to all those involved, so Satan uses his insidious organization of wicked angels to control masses of people who remain largely unaware of his role or influence.

The Bible alse informs us concerning demonic possession, and explains that particularly humans engaging in acts of spiritism open themselves up to such possession (which includes fortune telling, divination, psychic mediums, attempts to communicate with the dead; the type of things especially women in this world are often into, and the entertainment industry caters to these women especially with shows like "Medium", "Ghost adventures", "Charmed" and other shows and movies about the paranormal, magic or witchcraft).

Wouldn't ATS be a priority place for these types to conduct their suppression of truth concerning Satan, his demons and this global Satanic conspiracy? (alongside the MSM or entertainment industry, politics, business, the sciences and false religion/Babylon the Great; you'll wanna cover all your bases in "this system of things", maintain control of the flow of information in all areas of life). You can treat my question as a hypothetical question, that is, if what the Bible is saying is true, wouldn't ATS be a priority place for these types to suppress and discredit (often by means of ridicule) any truthful information about them? Even spread misinformation, that has the appearance of truthful and useful information about this global conspiracy, yet is actually just distracting from it, keeping people running around in circles chasing their own tails, never getting any closer to the actual truth of the matter, as taught in the Bible which exposes not only the conspiracy itself, but also the players and their modus operandi (which helps recognize the players), and why people fall for it + advice how not to fall into their trap or for their deception.

Matthew 24:3-14

3 While he was sitting on the Mount of Olives, the disciples approached him privately, saying: “Tell us, when will these things be, and what will be the sign of your presence and of the conclusion of the system of things?”

4 In answer Jesus said to them: “Look out that nobody misleads you, 5 for many will come on the basis of my name, saying, ‘I am the Christ,’ and will mislead many. 6 You are going to hear of wars and reports of wars. See that you are not alarmed, for these things must take place, but the end is not yet.

7 “For nation will rise against nation and kingdom against kingdom, and there will be food shortages and earthquakes in one place after another. 8 All these things are a beginning of pangs of distress.

9 “Then people will hand you over to tribulation and will kill you, and you will be hated by all the nations on account of my name. 10 Then, too, many will be stumbled and will betray one another and will hate one another. 11 Many false prophets will arise and mislead many; 12 and because of the increasing of lawlessness, the love of the greater number will grow cold. 13 But the one who has endured to the end will be saved. 14 And this good news of the Kingdom will be preached in all the inhabited earth for a witness to all the nations, and then the end will come.

2 Corinthians 4:3-9

3 If, in fact, the good news we declare is veiled, it is veiled among those who are perishing, 4 among whom the god of this system of things has blinded the minds of the unbelievers, so that the illumination* [Or “light.”] of the glorious good news about the Christ, who is the image of God, might not shine through. 5 For we are preaching, not about ourselves, but about Jesus Christ as Lord and ourselves as your slaves for Jesus’ sake. 6 For God is the one who said: “Let the light shine out of darkness,” and he has shone on our hearts to illuminate them with the glorious knowledge of God by the face of Christ.

7 However, we have this treasure in earthen vessels, so that the power beyond what is normal may be God’s and not from us. 8 We are hard-pressed in every way, but not cramped beyond movement; we are perplexed, but not absolutely with no way out;* [Or possibly, “but not left in despair.”] 9 we are persecuted, but not abandoned; we are knocked down, but not destroyed.

John 8:42-47

Jesus said to them: “If God were your Father, you would love me, for I came from God and I am here. I have not come of my own initiative, but that One sent me. 43 Why do you not understand what I am saying? Because you cannot listen to* [Or “accept.”] my word. 44 You are from your father the Devil, and you wish to do the desires of your father. That one was a murderer when he began, and he did not stand fast in the truth, because truth is not in him. When he speaks the lie, he speaks according to his own disposition, because he is a liar and the father of the lie. 45 Because I, on the other hand, tell you the truth, you do not believe me. 46 Who of you convicts me of sin? If I speak truth, why is it that you do not believe me? 47 The one who is from God listens to the sayings of God. This is why you do not listen, because you are not from God.”

“For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the wholesome* [Or “healthful; beneficial.”] teaching, but according to their own desires, they will surround themselves with teachers to have their ears tickled.* [Or “to tell them what they want to hear.”] They will turn away from listening to the truth and give attention to false stories.” (2 Timothy 4:3,4)

“So we should no longer be children, tossed about as by waves and carried here and there by every wind of teaching by means of the trickery of men, by means of cunning in deceptive schemes.” (Ephesians 4:14)

“And stop being molded by this system of things,* [ Or “this age.”] but be transformed by making your mind over, so that you may prove to yourselves the good and acceptable and perfect will of God.” (Romans 12:2)

“Look out that no one takes you captive by means of the philosophy and empty deception according to human tradition, according to the elementary things of the world and not according to Christ;” “We have much to say about him, and it is difficult to explain, because you have become dull in your hearing. For although by now* [Lit., “in view of the time.”] you should be teachers, you again need someone to teach you from the beginning the elementary things of the sacred pronouncements of God, and you have gone back to needing milk, not solid food. For everyone who continues to feed on milk is unacquainted with the word of righteousness, for he is a young child. But solid food belongs to mature people, to those who through use have their powers of discernment* [Or “their perceptive powers.”] trained to distinguish both right and wrong.” (Col 2:8; Hebrews 5:11-14)

“However, the inspired word clearly says that in later times some will fall away from the faith, paying attention to misleading inspired statements and teachings of demons, by means of the hypocrisy of men who speak lies, whose conscience is seared as with a branding iron.” (1 Timothy 4:1,2).Context (playlist): (False) Religion is a Snare and a Racket. You may also want to have a quick peek at the video that precedes that one, it has Isaac Newton explaining something about Babylon the Great/false religion (which if you look at my previous comment, includes nationalism and patriotism, as well as scientism):

a reply to: turdleton

Coming back to what I said earlier about those spreading "misinformation, that has the appearance of truthful and useful information about this global conspiracy, yet is actually just distracting from it, keeping people running around in circles chasing their own tails, never getting any closer to the actual truth of the matter, as taught in the Bible":

Knowledge (Insight on the Scriptures, Volume 2)

... Knowledge (gno'sis) is put in a very favorable light in the Christian Greek Scriptures. However, not all that men may call “knowledge” is to be sought, because philosophies and views exist that are “falsely called ‘knowledge.’” (1Ti 6:20) ... Thus Paul wrote about some who were learning (taking in knowledge) “yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge [...] of truth.” (2Ti 3:6, 7)

“... having an appearance of godliness but proving false to its power and from these turn away. From among these arise men who slyly work their way into households and captivate weak women loaded down with sins, led by various desires, always learning and yet never able to come to an accurate knowledge of truth.” (2Ti 3:5-7)

“Timothy, guard what has been entrusted to you, turning away from the empty speeches that violate what is holy and from the contradictions of the falsely called ‘knowledge.’ By making a show of such knowledge, some have deviated from the faith.” (1Ti 6:20) (mind you, the English word "science" comes from the Latin scientia, meaning "knowledge", hence the KJV renders this word "knowledge" here as "science", which are also still synonyms; but it counts just as much for what is presented as religious knowledge, both pseudoscience and theology is often based on or rooted in pagan religious philosophy, "human philosophy".)

How does God view the “wisdom” offered by human philosophy?

1 Cor. 1:19-25: “It is written: ‘I will make the wisdom of the wise men perish, and the intelligence of the intellectual men I will shove aside.’ Where is the wise man? Where the scribe? Where the debater of this system of things? Did not God make the wisdom of the world foolish? For since, in the wisdom of God, the world through its wisdom did not get to know God, God saw good through the foolishness [as it appears to the world] of what is preached to save those believing. . . . Because a foolish thing of God [as the world views it] is wiser than men, and a weak thing of God [as the world may see it] is stronger than men.” (Such a viewpoint on God’s part is certainly not arbitrary or unreasonable. He has provided in the Bible, the most widely circulated book in the world, a clear statement of his purpose. He has sent his witnesses to discuss it with all who will listen. How foolish for any creature to think that he has wisdom greater than that of God!)

Source: Philosophy (Reasoning From the Scriptures)

“Woe to those who say that good is bad and bad is good, those who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness, those who put bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter! Woe to those wise in their own eyes and discreet in their own sight!” (Isaiah 5:20,21)

And some advice now:

“Make sure of the more important things.”—PHIL. 1:10.

“Do not treat prophecies with contempt. Make sure of all things; hold fast to what is fine.” (1 Thessalonians 5:20,21)

“But let God be found true, even if every man be found a liar.” (Romans 3:4)

The Bible also provides a description of true/real Christians (as opposed to those merely professing to be Christians but have been deceived by counterfeit Christianity, Christendom, as discussed in my response to Hecate666):

“For though we walk in the flesh, we do not wage warfare* [“We do not wage warfare.” Lit., “we are not doing military service.” ...; Lat., non . . . mi·li·ta'mus.] according to what we are in the flesh. For the weapons of our warfare are not fleshly, but powerful by God for overturning strongly entrenched things. For we are overturning reasonings and every lofty thing raised up against the knowledge of God;” (2 Cor 10:3-5)

“A careful review of all the information available goes to show that, until the time of Marcus Aurelius [121-180 C.E.], no Christian became a soldier; and no soldier, after becoming a Christian, remained in military service.” (The Rise of Christianity, by E. W. Barnes, 1947, p. 333) “It will be seen presently that the evidence for the existence of a single Christian soldier between 60 and about 165 A.D. is exceedingly slight; . . . up to the reign of Marcus Aurelius at least, no Christian would become a soldier after his baptism.” (The Early Church and the World, by C. J. Cadoux, 1955, pp. 275, 276) “In the second century, Christianity . . . had affirmed the incompatibility of military service with Christianity.” (A Short History of Rome, by G. Ferrero and C. Barbagallo, 1919, p. 382) “The behavior of the Christians was very different from that of the Romans. . . . Since Christ had preached peace, they refused to become soldiers.” (Our World Through the Ages, by N. Platt and M. J. Drummond, 1961, p. 125) “The first Christians thought it was wrong to fight, and would not serve in the army even when the Empire needed soldiers.” (The New World’s Foundations in the Old, by R. and W. M. West, 1929, p. 131) “The Christians . . . shrank from public office and military service.” (Editorial introduction to “Persecution of the Christians in Gaul, A.D. 177,” in The Great Events by Famous Historians, edited by R. Johnson, 1905, Vol. III, p. 246) “While they [the Christians] inculcated the maxims of passive obedience, they refused to take any active part in the civil administration or the military defence of the empire. . . . It was impossible that the Christians, without renouncing a more sacred duty, could assume the character of soldiers, of magistrates, or of princes.”—The Decline and Fall of the Roman Empire, by Edward Gibbon, Vol. I, p. 416.

Context (playlist):

Current events-The End of False Religion is imminent!

Coming back to 1 Thessalonians 5:20 which advises not to treat prophecies with contempt (one of those pieces of advice that can help prevent being misled by "the ruler of this world" "who is misleading the entire inhabited earth", John 12:31; Rev 12:9):



Or should I have just put up the link?

the bible-accurate history reliable prophecy part 1 of 3

None of the information shared in that documentary, which mentions the term "new world order" in part 3, will be available or presented by the source of conspiracy entertainment referred to in your OP (opening post). Maybe some clues as to why that is the case (if what I said about it isn't convincing enough), can be spotted or understood from the experiences with conspiracy entertainment of the man in this video (not included in the playlist):

originally posted by: Coelacanth55

if you don't believe, not a bad idea to study what others do believe.

Well that would depend on the nature of the information that you're studying, wouldn't it? (such as whether or not it comes from a reliable source with something important or beneficial to teach or share, rather than a source catering to your desires, what intrigues you/'tickles your ears', based on how one is "molded by this system of things", Rom 12:2)

“For there will be a period of time when they will not put up with the wholesome* [Or “healthful; beneficial.”] teaching, but according to their own desires, they will surround themselves with teachers to have their ears tickled.* [Or “to tell them what they want to hear.”] They will turn away from listening to the truth and give attention to false stories.” (2 Timothy 4:3,4)

If what you're studying actually isn't true, or distracting from "the more important things" (Phil 1:10) to realize, learn or study, or just plain "rotten" (Eph 4:29), you may end up filling your mind with mental poison (see my signature). If you fall for it and believe you are learning something valuable, healthful, beneficial or important (or that something that actually represents spiritual "darkness" is spiritual "light", Isa 5:20, or is enlightening you), you may also end up repeating it to others (or recommending it).

“Let a rotten word not come out of your mouth, but only what is good for building up as the need may be, to impart what is beneficial to the hearers.” (Eph 4:29)

“All Scripture is inspired of God and beneficial for teaching, for reproving, for setting things straight, for disciplining in righteousness, so that the man of God may be fully competent, completely equipped for every good work.” (2 Tim 3:16,17)

Just a heads-up.

“For what reason? Because I do not love you? God knows I do.

But what I am doing I will continue to do, in order to eliminate the pretext of those who are wanting a basis for being found equal to us in the things about which they boast. For such men are false apostles, deceitful workers, disguising themselves as apostles of Christ. And no wonder, for Satan himself keeps disguising himself as an angel of light. It is therefore nothing extraordinary if his ministers also keep disguising themselves as ministers of righteousness. But their end will be according to their works.” (2 Cor 11:11-15)

Babylon the Great (Reasoning From the Scriptures)

... Following the Flood of Noah’s day, false religion had its beginning at Babel (later known as Babylon). (Gen. 10:8-10; 11:4-9) In time, Babylonish religious beliefs and practices spread to many lands. So Babylon the Great became a fitting name for false religion as a whole.

...

Ancient Babylonian religious concepts and practices are found in religions worldwide

“Egypt, Persia, and Greece felt the influence of the Babylonian religion . . . The strong admixture of Semitic elements both in early Greek mythology and in Grecian cults is now so generally admitted by scholars as to require no further comment. These Semitic elements are to a large extent more specifically Babylonian.”—The Religion of Babylonia and Assyria (Boston, 1898), M. Jastrow, Jr., pp. 699, 700.

Their gods: There were triads of gods, and among their divinities were those representing various forces of nature and ones that exercised special influence in certain activities of mankind. (Babylonian and Assyrian Religion, Norman, Okla.; 1963, S. H. Hooke, pp. 14-40) “The Platonic trinity, itself merely a rearrangement of older trinities dating back to earlier peoples, appears to be the rational philosophic trinity of attributes that gave birth to the three hypostases or divine persons taught by the Christian churches. . . . This Greek philosopher’s [Plato’s] conception of the divine trinity . . . can be found in all the ancient [pagan] religions.”—Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel (Paris, 1865-1870), edited by M. Lachâtre, Vol. 2, p. 1467.

Use of images: ...

Belief regarding death: “Neither the people nor the leaders of religious thought [in Babylon] ever faced the possibility of the total annihilation of what once was called into existence. Death was a passage to another kind of life.”—The Religion of Babylonia and Assyria, p. 556. [whereislogic: see also Myth 1: The Soul Is Immortal from the article series One Myth Leads to Another.]

Position of the priesthood: “The distinction between priest and layman is characteristic of this [Babylonian] religion.”—Encyclopædia Britannica (1948), Vol. 2, p. 861. [whereislogic: Jesus condemned a clergy-laity class distinction and forbade the use of religious titles: “But you, do not you be called Rabbi, for one is your Teacher, and all of you are brothers. Moreover, do not call anyone your father on earth, for one is your Father, the heavenly One.” (Matt 23:8,9)]

Practice of astrology, divination, magic, and sorcery: Historian A. H. Sayce writes: “[In] the religion of ancient Babylonia . . . every object and force of nature was supposed to have its zi or spirit, who could be controlled by the magical exorcisms of the Shaman, or sorcerer-priest.” (The History of Nations, New York, 1928, Vol. I, p. 96) “The Chaldeans [Babylonians] made great progress in the study of astronomy through an effort to discover the future in the stars. This art we call ‘astrology.’”—The Dawn of Civilization and Life in the Ancient East (Chicago, 1938), R. M. Engberg, p. 230.

...

a reply to: turdleton

After just posting in one of the "reactionary conspiracy" threads, I'd like to take this opportunity to thank you for coming across as a real person, and not some program auto-generating the distracting "false stories" to 'tickle people's ears' "according to their desires" mentioned at 2 Tim 4:3,4. For the purpose of distracting them and preventing them from learning anything about the global conspiracy I talked about in this thread and exposed in the Bible.

We used to have these QAnon threads doing the same thing as these "reactionary conspiracy" threads. What were they called again, "Q questions...."?

Sometimes bots are really easy to spot, other times, they are not.