It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
The One Infinite Creator
The Law of One states that there is only one, and that one is the Infinite Creator (4.20), which Ra also calls “Infinite Intelligence” and “Intelligent Infinity.” It is impossible to describe the “one undifferentiated intelligent infinity, unpolarized, full and whole” but It can be activated or potentiated (28.1). Each portion of the creation contains, paradoxically, the whole (13.13).
Illusion
Since all is one, all manifestation, or appearance of many-ness, is an illusion (1.6, 106.23). According to Ra, it is an illusion carefully engineered in order to give the Creator the opportunity to know Itself (27.17).
Distortion
In Ra’s terms, “distortion” is anything that moves away from undistorted unity. This can be either what we would consider “good” (distortion toward love) or “bad” (distortion towards ill health). There are three fundamental distortions of Infinite Intelligence:
Free Will (The First Distortion)
The first distortion is free will, or finity, or the limit of the viewpoint (13.12, 15.21, 99.5). The created universe that we experience is the Creator’s exploration of Itself through the first distortion, which Ra also calls the Law of Confusion (27.10). Ra defines free will as the recognition “that the Creator will know Itself” (27.8).
The Logos (The Second Distortion)
The second distortion is Love, or the Logos, or the Creative Principle (15.21). It is “the focus, the choice of attack, the type of energy of an extremely, shall we say, high order which causes intelligent energy to be formed from the potential of intelligent infinity in just such and such a way.” (27.12) A Logos can create a single star system or it can create a galaxy with billions of star systems (28.7). Each galaxy has its own system of natural laws (13.13) and, I believe, its own “cosmic mind” (91.2). Ra says that some of its members have wandered to the creations of other Logoi, and that the “experience has been one which staggers the intellectual and intuitive capacities.” (90.17) In the case of galactic systems, the first physical manifestation of a Logos is a cluster of central systems (82.8).
Light (The Third Distortion)
The third distortion is light (15.21). It is the first manifestation visible to the eye (78.9). Light is intelligent, full of energy, and the building block of what we call matter (13.9). Light’s characteristics include “the infinite whole paradoxically described by the straight line.” Ra says that this “paradox is responsible for the shape of the various physical illusion entities you call solar systems, galaxies, and planets, all revolving and tending towards the lenticular.” (13.9). Light energy has an upward spiraling characteristic which impels evolution. (13.17).
Sub-Logoi
Our galaxy was created by a single Logos (28.9) and our sun is a sub-Logos of that Logos (29.1) A sub-Logos individualizes or differentiates the natural laws set up by its Logos (13.13, 29.2). It also refines the cosmic mind into its specific archetypical mind, informed by the experience of earlier sub-Logoi (81.33, 91.3).
Sub-Sub-Logoi
Humans are an example of sub-sub-Logoi (29.7).
originally posted by: CosmicFocus
a reply to: Shoshanna
I slightly knew the channeler of that material and have some of her material from working in Austin's UFO groups back in the 1980s. She was based in Austin. I think maybe she died here also. Her first name was Jean. I don't remember her last name. She had a serious, physical illness.
Channelers are another often over-looked aspect of UFOs/ETs. In my estimation, channelers are what they frequently call themselves, nothing but a poorconduits of what a lot of humans reject out of hand as it does not meet their personal criteria. --Not that they necessarily have even part of one.
I would not be surprised if we did not experience a channeler to appear at this point in our midst and gain a wide following with his/her/its cosmic views.
Being abductee, I have supplied to ATS some channeler-types of views, and outlooks, but I ain't no channeler even if I have been loaded up with strange viewpoints to dispel to the unwashed.
originally posted by: Topcraft
a reply to: AcrobaticDreams1
I understand the concept of channeling, but can you trust that? Who does it come from? Why are “they” trying to get a message to you? If it comes from the human mind, how can we trust the person is not schizophrenic? If it comes from an actual outside entity, how can we trust its ultimate intentions? Personally, either way, I don’t trust it. Your mileage may vary.
originally posted by: Topcraft
a reply to: AcrobaticDreams1
Personally, I trust in God. But that’s not the issue here. Perhaps I can give you a better answer if you tell me what leads you to trust in channeling. You said “in my experience “. That leads me to believe that you have more knowledge on the subject than I do. Trust for me comes very hard, and I need actual facts to base truthfulness on.