Any Bets on What Happens

a reply to: theatreboy

How many jumped the fence?

That's been covered already, I see.

What do they matter? They deserve to be drowned out. And all who assaulted or threatened law enforcement can win their Jihadist prize. And if they set off more angry antizionists with smoke bombs, arrest those protestors for assault as well.

You can really get them back by waving an Israeli and American flag together from across the street. Start yelling "We support Israel and you can't change it" through a megaphone.

That will really expose what they are about.

But don't expect the J6 treatment for these. A punishment similar to an irate person punching a cop at a park is what should be expected. That's what they were, angry wannabe jihadists threatening law enforcement because their life is free enough to have time to do that.

It seems like Code Pink is there to pick the wrong side always. They protest support of Israel, drone strikes of Taliban, and helping Ukraine. They'll protest helping Taiwan if it ever comes up. They are consistently against anything that helps war, for the children. Interesting they align with pro Hamas people, but whatever, to each her own.

Don't major in liberal arts with a preexisting abundance of crocodile tears.

originally posted by: chr0naut
All should be equal under the law.

I agree, that all should be equal, and the other side of the coin is the punishment should fit the crime. We see neither with the left.

What for!

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: theatreboy

1) they didn't enter the white house

2) they didn't interfere with transfer of power

3) no destruction of federal property

4) free speech

3 and 4 are false.

There are plenty videos of defacing of monuments and assaults on peace officers.

Point being the rather wide, like entire worlds between the way certain groups and people are treated by the law.

Also while I understand the notion of prosecutorial discretion, when it's demonstrated as weaponized, we have a serious problem. A problem that has been obvious for well over a decade.

Just my two cp.

Okay. Vandalism and assault, outside of the white house and distant from the physical border containing the facility. Still not insurrection, which was my point, I didn't state that clearly and I'll do so now. This is just more antifa and further display of reactionary liberals being the problem with this nation.

a reply to: TzarChasm

Agreed with a caveat.

They've been allowed to be a problem. Incentivized even.

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut
All should be equal under the law.

I agree, that all should be equal, and the other side of the coin is the punishment should fit the crime. We see neither with the left.

And worse with the right.

It's a conundrum!

originally posted by: chr0naut

And worse with the right.

Not really, the right hasn't made it a political weapon like the left has done so we are talking double standards with them. The left at the state level has made a mockery of the justice system too and that is why we see all the high crime. Isn't it nice you can just walk into a store and take what you want and not get stopped or arrested in liberal cities?

originally posted by: Xtrozero

originally posted by: chr0naut

And worse with the right.

Not really, the right hasn't made it a political weapon like the left has done so we are talking double standards with them. The left at the state level has made a mockery of the justice system too and that is why we see all the high crime. Isn't it nice you can just walk into a store and take what you want and not get stopped or arrested in liberal cities?

The Republican party has been challenging stuff in court going back to Lincoln's Presidency - lawfare - they do it.

How many court cases did Trump fire off in his futile attempt to break the Constitutional processes of the elections?

And how much of your tax money was blown on that illegitimate grab for power?

But I'm sure you'll contribute.

Bread and circuses.

Can't find the fetterman thread on this little cell phone. Senator fetterman injured in car crash.

www.thegatewaypundit.com...

a reply to: chr0naut

Wasn't anywhere near as much as was used to impeach him and try him.

Not to mention its within the purview of a POTUS to ensure legal elections.

Which cases are still going on today.


But dont let that stop you from continuing to lie all over the site....

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Wasn't anywhere near as much as was used to impeach him and try him.

Not to mention its within the purview of a POTUS to ensure legal elections.

Which cases are still going on today.

But dont let that stop you from continuing to lie all over the site....

What about the 4,000 legal cases Trump or his businesses were involved in (like his fraudulent Trump University, or the workers he refused to pay, & etc.), in the years before he became President?

Did the Democrats (and some Republicans, independents, and apolitical citizens) time travel?

Or could he have been a criminal that they just couldn't convict for a long time - like Al Capone was)?

Personal and business legal affairs of Donald Trump

a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

The ones he owns, and directs?

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

The ones he owns, and directs?

While he was in office?

The ones he was forced to separate from because yall threw yet another fit?

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

The ones he owns, and directs?

While he was in office?

The ones he was forced to separate from because yall threw yet another fit?

The 4,000 legal cases were from before he was in office.

And every other President in American history divested themselves of their businesses when they assumed office.

This is probably because it meant they could concentrate on the country, rather than their own business, and also it represents a conflict of interest to use the Presidential office to promote a specific private business - it would be like the pinnacle of political corruption.

All the other Presidents seem to have known that.

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

The ones he owns, and directs?

While he was in office?

The ones he was forced to separate from because yall threw yet another fit?

The 4,000 legal cases were from before he was in office.

And every other President in American history divested themselves of their businesses when they assumed office.

This is probably because it meant they could concentrate on the country, rather than their own business, and also it represents a conflict of interest to use the Presidential office to promote a specific private business - it would be like the pinnacle of political corruption.

All the other Presidents seem to have known that.

Just stop.

The Trump Organization is a worldwide company with over 22,000 employees that work for around 250 companies.

Every major business/organization/company on the planet has continuous lawsuits going all the time for one reason or another.

It’s part of big business.

Apple
Coca-Cola
Amazon
Facebook
Disney
Ford
GM
Fiat-Chrysler
Google
Etc.

The more money you make, the more people sue you.
And as much as you weak clowns hate Trump, why don’t you sue him for hurt feelz?

So just stop.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

The ones he owns, and directs?

While he was in office?

The ones he was forced to separate from because yall threw yet another fit?

The 4,000 legal cases were from before he was in office.

And every other President in American history divested themselves of their businesses when they assumed office.

This is probably because it meant they could concentrate on the country, rather than their own business, and also it represents a conflict of interest to use the Presidential office to promote a specific private business - it would be like the pinnacle of political corruption.

All the other Presidents seem to have known that.

Just stop.

The Trump Organization is a worldwide company with over 22,000 employees that work for around 250 companies.

Every major business/organization/company on the planet has continuous lawsuits going all the time for one reason or another.

It’s part of big business.

Apple
Coca-Cola
Amazon
Facebook
Disney
Ford
GM
Fiat-Chrysler
Google
Etc.

The more money you make, the more people sue you.
And as much as you weak clowns hate Trump, why don’t you sue him for hurt feelz?

So just stop.

The Trump Organization is the holding company of the 'Trump group of companies'. It has no board of directors and is fully directed and owned by Donald Trump. It has only one subsidiary (Trump International Realty).

This is it's official org chart:

The Trump Organization

It has only one person at the board level. It's all on him.

This 2017 document outlines Trump's company org chart during his Presidency and shows he retained ownership and blocked GSA from ensuring full handover of the company to his nominated new directors:

Trump Org Chart and Letter From House Dems

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: chr0naut

originally posted by: JinMI
a reply to: chr0naut

Did the "and his businesses" somehow not factor into your theory?

The ones he owns, and directs?

While he was in office?

The ones he was forced to separate from because yall threw yet another fit?

The 4,000 legal cases were from before he was in office.

And every other President in American history divested themselves of their businesses when they assumed office.

This is probably because it meant they could concentrate on the country, rather than their own business, and also it represents a conflict of interest to use the Presidential office to promote a specific private business - it would be like the pinnacle of political corruption.

All the other Presidents seem to have known that.

Just stop.

The Trump Organization is a worldwide company with over 22,000 employees that work for around 250 companies.

Every major business/organization/company on the planet has continuous lawsuits going all the time for one reason or another.

It’s part of big business.

Apple
Coca-Cola
Amazon
Facebook
Disney
Ford
GM
Fiat-Chrysler
Google
Etc.

The more money you make, the more people sue you.
And as much as you weak clowns hate Trump, why don’t you sue him for hurt feelz?

So just stop.

The Trump Organization is the holding company of the 'Trump group of companies'. It has no board of directors and is fully directed and owned by Donald Trump. It has only one subsidiary (Trump International Realty).

This is it's official org chart:

The Trump Organization

It has only one person at the board level. It's all on him.

This 2017 document outlines Trump's company org chart during his Presidency and shows he retained ownership and blocked GSA from ensuring full handover of the company to his nominated new directors:

Trump Org Chart and Letter From House Dems

Don’t care.

Still voting for him.