Yale law professor says Trump isn’t a convicted felon despite guilty verdict

a reply to: budzprime69

I'd be curious to see where it was actually laid out that that was the "another crime". If I remember correctly the judge specifically instructed the jurors that they need not agree on what the "another crime" was.

I also find it interesting that the term "defraud" is used. Who was defrauded? Who was the victim?

originally posted by: JinMI

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Albone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

But at least his posts are short.

As a female, I'm sensing by his posts that they are not the only thing that is short...

It's not about the length of your posts.


It's how you use them!

(That's what my wife says anyway.)

A wise man told me that it is not about the size of the wave, nor is it the motion of the ocean.......it's simply about the ships ability to stay in port until all passengers get off.


As far as Trumps goes, call him whatever you want. You might be calling him President in the near future.

a reply to: MrGashler

There was literally the theory of three possible theoretical crimes.

From the judges instructions…



Has the validity of Trump guilty because bad man orange.

a reply to: MrGashler

You can read the BS of judge instructions and the “theory” of a theoretical crime in the link below.

static01.nyt.com...