Yale law professor says Trump isn’t a convicted felon despite guilty verdict

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: Lumenari

Sure, whatever floats your boat.

Thank you for the rather brilliant reply to my question...

I may have to reconsider my Presidential candidate now based on that.

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: Lumenari

Sure, whatever floats your boat.

Thank you for the rather brilliant reply to my question...

I may have to reconsider my Presidential candidate now based on that.

I am always glad to help. But I would hardly call the two front runners presidential though.

a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

But at least his posts are short.

originally posted by: Albone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

But at least his posts are short.

Whos posts are tall?

originally posted by: Albone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

But at least his posts are short.

As a female, I'm sensing by his posts that they are not the only thing that is short...

a reply to: DBCowboy

There's a few that like to post walls of mental gymnastics. And they seem to think they know more based off a random Google search than a law professor from Yale. It doesn't help that a kangaroo court in a Banana Republic pretty much confirmed everything that Google search told them.

Sorry dude,

BUT TRUMP IS A FELON NOW.

Accept it or not. That is just a fact.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

a reply to: Disgusted123

How many years in prison should he get?


In your opinion.

It's hard to believe a liberally taught elitists college graduate.

Isn't that the line around here. Colleges are bad and indoctrinating our youth? Well, this guy is just another one of those folks. Why would I believe a pinko college indoctrinated elitist?



a reply to: RazorV66

a reply to: Disgusted123

How about the arguments?


I mean it's easy to find bias in opinion and narrative in editorialized pieces.

Do you see that here and are the Constitutional arguments not rational?

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Albone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

But at least his posts are short.

As a female, I'm sensing by his posts that they are not the only thing that is short...

It's not about the length of your posts.


It's how you use them!

(That's what my wife says anyway.)

originally posted by: Lumenari

originally posted by: Albone

originally posted by: DBCowboy
a reply to: budzprime69

Glad that you are determining who is presidential.

*whew*

But at least his posts are short.

As a female, I'm sensing by his posts that they are not the only thing that is short...

I just put on my 'Size 15' Birkenstocks to run over to agree with you.

Second Line: I agree with you.

Will someone put me straight. As I understood it a Ms Daniels gets paid hush money before the Presidential election. Then a couple of years later she admits on tape that she lied. Now that to me is not hush money but blackmail. So her and that money should not even make an appearance.
Next, from what I've read about the case Trump never paid anyone anything it was all his lawyers bag. Ok trump ok,ed the payments as something else but as his lawyer his job should have been to keep Trump squeaky clean. Is that correct?
Now this lawyer who job it was to keep Trumps dealing legal is now the prosecutions main witness against Trump?
Now I get the term double dealing.

a reply to: Disgusted123

Wouldn’t be the first time a judge and / or jury were wrong.

Good thing we have a system of appeals..

a reply to: ADVISOR

It would be such a classic, epic fail if there is a mistrial due to jury misconduct or if the SCOTUS stepped in and rectified this lawfare and Trump was never a "convicted felon" as the msm has been reporting, wetting themselves. Everyone knows it will be overturned on appeal anyway but to take the "convicted felon" lablel away from them after weeks of wetting themselves would be like taking a teddy bear from a child. Things seem to always backfire on dems when Trump is involved. The dems remind me of Wile E Coyote.

originally posted by: RazorV66

originally posted by: TzarChasm
a reply to: ADVISOR

Allegedly, trump paid "campaign expenses" to cover up a scandal which would have affected his election outcome. Allegedly.

That's what he was convicted for, the effort to influence the public in his favor by suppressing the stormy daniels controversy. Allegedly.

I don't know, that's the most sense I can sorta kinda make from my research and much smarter folks with degrees and salaries have agreed it doesn't get better than what I explained.

Nope.

The FEC didn’t charge him with anything.

If they did, they would have only fined him just like they have fined many many campaigns over the years.

I put the word allegedly in there, three times, to reflect the fact it's not my opinion but what I've read. I'm simply relaying misinformation so it can be properly deconstructed by users like yourself.

a reply to: ADVISOR

Since whatever it is will be reversed-overturned-made moot, the labels attached to our next President at this moment over the hush-yo-mouth-money case, mean ZILCH.

a reply to: JinMI

These guys are just spinning people up. They enjoy it.

They've lost...they know it...now it's all just about trying to see how many people they can incite into riots, making people angry and trying to stir up a fight. They've lost...everything...including their own self respect.

Like the water off the back of a duck, my friend...like the water off the back of a duck!

Don't let these low-information types get to ya'!

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Oh, I'm having a grand ol time FCD!

Getting these folks to profess their ignorance is quite the entertainment for me these days.

to you sir