The Left has Exterminated their Platform

For every ying there is a yang.

10% of people who once thought Trump was innocent of the Hush Money charges now believe Trump is in fact guilty.

However 10% who throught Trump was guilty at the time of indictment now think otherwise.

Therefor the prosecution of Donald Trump for categorizing hush money payments as legal experience months after the election was over has had no real impact on the country's opinion.

Views of Trump trial unchanged following verdict — CBS News poll

Overall, opinions of the verdict are in line with what views of Trump's guilt or innocence were before the verdict was reached. Among those who thought Trump was guilty before hearing the verdict, nine in 10 now say the jury reached the right verdict — and vice versa for those who previously thought he wasn't guilty.

link

What will the Biden administration have to do now in the hopes to move the needle in an election were he is trailing?

If Biden gives the go a head to sentence Trump to jail time over his guilty verdict will that help or hurt him? I imagine its a tough decision for the Administration to make.

A plurality of Americans, 50%, think former President Donald Trump's guilty verdict on all 34 counts in his hush money trial was correct, a new ABC News/Ipsos poll finds,

Forty-seven percent of Americans said they think the charges against Trump in this case were politically motivated, while 38% say they were not.

link

The country is split 50/50 on the verdict. But a significant more believe the trial was politically motivated than not.

What will be more important for the American people in November? Trump seeing justice or the Biden administration orchestrating politically prosecution?

With the 50/50 (justice) vs 47/38 (political persecution) stack ups the Biden administration may have a harder hill to clime. But it could be that some actually approve of the political persecution.

a reply to: Dandandat3

What will the Biden administration have to do now in the hopes to move the needle in an election were he is trailing?

The same as any other dictator and destroy the free press.

ALERT: InfoWars may be SHUT DOWN, doors locked, equipment liquidated, in latest government assault on freedom of the press

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
The Trump verdict is a good thing (for conservatives). The left has just proven beyond any shadow of a doubt that they have corrupted the American justice system, the American legal system and the republic for which it stands. They have detonated a nuclear warhead on their own party. They have proven themselves to be nothing more than a corrupt, venom filled, party of hatred, vindictiveness and revenge. That's all they stand for now. They have reduced themselves to zero, and now, into oblivion.

The liberal left Democrats have just committed political suicide. And, their party, platform and support base has been exterminated.

With nothing left to run on, the Biden Administration is saying they will not release the AUDIO of Joe Biden being interviewed by Special Counsel Robert Hur, because it will invade his privacy, and the audio recording could be manipulated by the public to make Biden sound/look bad.

The Audio would invade Biden's Privacy, even though the written transcript of the interview did not!

Biden/Democrats are officially on the precipice of being certifiably CRAZY: redstate.com...
🤪

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Did he or did he not violate New York state laws? Educate me.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Did he or did he not violate New York state laws? Educate me.

How about you start by telling me which laws you are asking if he violated! Or, are you asking me to run down an alphabetical list of the entire NY State penal Code and speculate about which laws you might be referring to? Which, BTW, I have absolutely zero intention of doing (even if I could). So...

Educate me.

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Did he or did he not violate New York state laws? Educate me.

How about you start by telling me which laws you are asking if he violated! Or, are you asking me to run down an alphabetical list of the entire NY State penal Code and speculate about which laws you might be referring to? Which, BTW, I have absolutely zero intention of doing (even if I could). So...

Educate me.

the one that everyone claims to know, but can't articulate. But it's been posted trillions of times, and they aren't going to do your homework. I think that covers it.

originally posted by: quintessentone
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

Did he or did he not violate New York state laws? Educate me.

are you aware of the term "statue of limitations"?

a reply to: network dude

They can't articulate it, or even cite it directly, because it's fantasy! There isn't one; it's pure fiction, not one atom of reality to it. There was no crime, so there's no crime to cite. The people relentlessly asking these questions are people who are desperately hoping someone will fill in the blanks for them so THEY will know (because they don't know what crime Trump was convicted of either)!

a reply to: network dude

'Statute of Limitations' implies a crime was committed, but the statute covering this crime's applicability has expired.

I would counter that no crime was committed (at all), and therefore any discussion about statutes of limitations is irrelevant. Had the statutes still been in effect, and this case had been tried in a truly objective court of law, and presided over by a judge who was not biased, a not guilty verdict should have been returned (if it was even allowed to be brought to trial in the first place).

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: network dude

They can't articulate it, or even cite it directly, because it's fantasy! There isn't one; it's pure fiction, not one atom of reality to it. There was no crime, so there's no crime to cite. The people relentlessly asking these questions are people who are desperately hoping someone will fill in the blanks for them so THEY will know (because they don't know what crime Trump was convicted of either)!

Yep - all I am hearing are rehashes of the same statements without any substance.

'No one is above the law'
'The jury agreed with the prosecutor'
'The system worked'

etc.

All just meaningless defensive talking points instead of answering questions.
When it gets to that level argument it's already done and you know it is worth continuing - because they can't anser the questions without conceding what is fairly obvious - it was a political show trial and election interference.

So Does this mean that there will be Knock Down Drag Out Fights at the Future Debates ?
Dam Gotta get more Popcorn if i can Afford it.
'
a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

a reply to: bluesman023

This has nothing to do with the future debates. In fact, if anything, the current situation eliminates (entirely) any 'future debates' from even taking place!

Try to keep up.

a reply to: Flyingclaydisk

That is prolly what Biden wanted in the first place,so they can get him out of debates with a felon.*smh*

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: network dude

'Statute of Limitations' implies a crime was committed, but the statute covering this crime's applicability has expired.

I would counter that no crime was committed (at all), and therefore any discussion about statutes of limitations is irrelevant. Had the statutes still been in effect, and this case had been tried in a truly objective court of law, and presided over by a judge who was not biased, a not guilty verdict should have been returned (if it was even allowed to be brought to trial in the first place).

Correct because that alleged crime was a Misdemeanor that was later Morphed into a Felony by Bragg .

a reply to: Dandandat3

Says the mainstream news…. 🙄

originally posted by: Zanti Misfit

originally posted by: Flyingclaydisk
a reply to: network dude

'Statute of Limitations' implies a crime was committed, but the statute covering this crime's applicability has expired.

I would counter that no crime was committed (at all), and therefore any discussion about statutes of limitations is irrelevant. Had the statutes still been in effect, and this case had been tried in a truly objective court of law, and presided over by a judge who was not biased, a not guilty verdict should have been returned (if it was even allowed to be brought to trial in the first place).

Correct because that alleged crime was a Misdemeanor that was later Morphed into a Felony by Bragg .

Additionally, various people have just been fined for such rather than been tried as a criminal.
Not to mention the hush fund Congress has for what he was accused of, and taxpayer funded at that. What kind of crazy hypocrisy is this ?

June 5, 2024

Thanks to "Get Trump!" New Yorkers, Kathy Hochul(Gov), Alvin Bragg (DA), and Juan Merchan (Judge):

DONALD TRUMP is now STEAMROLLING JOE BIDEN.

American Voters Prefer: TRUMP 56% to BIDEN 37%

Source: gettr.com...

a reply to: WeMustCare

American Voters Prefer: TRUMP 56% to BIDEN 37%

If you take out the voters that have been gas lit, 7-8% Biden support is where I peg it.

Pfff, all so-called "justice systems" in every country in the world have already been corrupt from the start. The better term would be "injustice system". In my country, they call the type of state we live in a "justice state" (one word: rechtsstaat). Same deal, it's more of an injustice state. I don't see the justice they speak of because many of the laws that are written are already injust. If those who write (or determin) these laws (politicians) are corrupt, what else could be the endresult.

'What they have stolen from the poor is in their houses.' (Isaiah 3:14)

“They have grown fat and smooth; they overflow with evil.” And “they deny justice to the poor.” (Jeremiah 5:28)

“Your princes are stubborn and partners with thieves. [in these days mostly corporations, incl. the biggest most influential arms manufacturers or other components of the military industrial complex; but also the most powerful criminal gangs, drug dealers, people smugglers and sex traffickers, the ones who always escape justice but will have their competition, mostly individuals with less influential connections or friends in high places, arrested and charged by their buddies, 2 other criminal gangs known as the police and justice department.]

Every one of them loves a bribe and chases after gifts.

They do not grant justice to the fatherless,* [Or “the orphans.”]

And the legal case of the widow never reaches them.” (Isaiah 1:23)

They “detest justice and . . . make crooked all that is straight.” (Micah 3:9)

History keeps repeating itself: “What has been is what will be, and what has been done will be done again; there is nothing new under the sun." (Eccl. 1:9)

I don't feel inclined to talk about Trump's legal issues, he's rich enough and it won't affect his lifestyle (much). Efficient way to get attention and get people to vote for him again though (making them feel they are fighting injustice for doing so, not only a false impression but a pipe dream as well).

Pardon the cynical edge to my comment, but is it true cynicism when it is true? (regardless if you believe me or not, which is unlikely in the first place; this is not just a rhetorical question, if anyone feels inclined to give their opinion on this question, feel free to do so, but please don't ignore this remark then, and try to answer it as a hypothetical, as if it is true > "when it is true", in that case, is it true cynicism then?)