NASA engineer creates propulsion system that defies the laws of physics

A tiny observation……the private company in cahoots with NASA is named Exodus Propulsion Technologies.

Odd or foreshadowing using ….”Exodus”…..like getting the hell off of this planet earth type exodus…

Hmmm

👽🍹

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1
A tiny observation……the private company in cahoots with NASA is named Exodus Propulsion Technologies.

Odd or foreshadowing using ….”Exodus”…..like getting the hell off of this planet earth type exodus…

Hmmm

👽🍹

Or maybe it means Moses will be coming back down from the mountain to save us all.

Hope springs eternal.

a reply to: SchrodingersRat

Ahhh yeahhhh …. that didn’t work out so well last time….🤭



👽🍹

"...NASA engineer creates propulsion system that defies the laws of physics..."

Aside of his ideas, I and some suggest that there is NO propulsion system onboard alien craft. Crafts are controlled remotely by some beam technology teleporting an object in dissolved state of matter. Fuzziness in close up pictures could be the result of the dissolved state.

And how would one fit a propulsion system that defies the laws of physics? tic tacs were of a moderate size, orbs even smaller.

a reply to: Raptured

"Hopefully this guy won't disappear like everyone else"

discussion closed - national security

In this old UFO Hunter’s episode vid…..aspect’s of reverse engineering and propulsion is investigated…..

One thing I never knew is that Ben Rich of skunk works may have been inspired for the aircraft skunk works produced because he himself purported to have two of his own sightings…



👽🍿

originally posted by: Ophiuchus1

One thing I never knew is that Ben Rich of skunk works may have been inspired for the aircraft skunk works produced because he himself purported to have two of his own sightings…

Kelly Johnson had a sighting too.
www.nicap.org...

Cant see your vid. currently but seem to remember Rich's acct. was Horten HO229 looking.

Justice probably had good visibility on those and other reports from the Lockheed "weird file" via his side role as official company Archivist.

originally posted by: baablacksheep1
a reply to: Jukiodone

Are you keeping up with Jack Juki. He is busy playing with Simon presently.

Yeah saw that....
Jack's association decision tree seems to be:

Can I call them a schmuck if they have any questions?
Is it somewhere in Europe (because you know- I'm very cosmopolitan)?
Does it include a free dinner?

If Yes to all of the above: Book a Ticket.

OR, it could be what has been talked about for ages, ie. that they already have these technologies (UFO reversed engineering) and want to control the release of these technologies for their own ends., hence the tantalising, slow, disclosure.
Example:- say they have a devise for free zero point energy, would they release that? No. Why, because it would ruin the energy companies, the oil producing countries and that means the whole American economy because it is based on the petro dollar.

a reply to: Jukiodone

Thanks Juki….for posting that doc….which I’ve now downloaded 😉…it’s a keeper.

There’s also this…..

In the video below…although Jack Northrop did not have a first hand sighting of a UFO…he did however have second hand knowledge from his employees that witnessed a UFO first hand ….. Jack is a believer and in the vid he goes on to speak of UFO and human propulsion theory’s.

“John "Jack" Northrop rare 1974 interview: UFOs are real advanced machines impossible to replicate”



Interesting…..Ben Rich, Kelly Johnson, Jack Northrop……the heads of high tech aerospace were believers in UFO’s which may have in some ways…helped fuel their passion and inspirations for the aerospace they loved.

👽☕️🍩

originally posted by: Scratchpost
what about the electricity & high whats?

I'm guessing you meant high watts?

originally posted by: Ernestc
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

It won't be possible if it violates conservation of momentum and conservation of energy. The article is a little sensationalist.

This is just flat earth thinking, pure and simple.

Any new tech that appeared to violate established laws of physics wouldn't violate said laws, it would simply be expanding on them.

Open your mind.

originally posted by: tanstaafl

originally posted by: Ernestc
a reply to: Ophiuchus1

It won't be possible if it violates conservation of momentum and conservation of energy. The article is a little sensationalist.

This is just flat earth thinking, pure and simple.

Any new tech that appeared to violate established laws of physics wouldn't violate said laws, it would simply be expanding on them.

Open your mind.

you underestimate the LAZINESS to rewrite scientific theory.