Androgeneous, Bisexual, Homosexual, or Heterosexual?

Everyone is one of these four:

Androgeneous means you do not exactly use your genitalia with a mate for traditional pleasure purposes.

Bisexual really means you use your genitalia for pleasure purposes with people of any gender.

Homosexual means you only use your genitalia for pleasure with the same gender: ie: men with men, women with women.

Heterosexual means you use your genitals for traditional coitius with the opposite sex.
Discuss here.

a reply to: Camshaft420

Hopefully we can all embrace bisexuality one day. I’m tired of being limited.

a reply to: Camshaft420

I think you need to look up androgenous. It says nothing about sexual preference. Just about appearing not to be ether or unknown. I think you might have ment asexual.

Discuss here.

Discuss what? People fall into one of those catagories.I think you pretty much covered it all.

An argument could be made that sex is for procreation, not recreation.

a reply to: Camshaft420

a reply to: Camshaft420

who cares?

there are 2 sexes male and female

if a trans person died today and in 500 years some archeologest digest their bones up they will see what chromosomes or present

the whole idea of transgender is a bastardisation of medicine and the parents should be jailed


let kids be kids.

if you care about what's in someone's pants it sounds like you might have a problem


others sexual choices should stay in the bed room

a reply to: Dalamax

I think one could argue that if many did not see it as for recreation, there would be less ones around.

Then again, only 1.5 of the 4 categories are capable of procreation. Without violating their definitions.

a reply to: DronesandUFOs

Funny how you were the first to being kids into the discussion.

But I do agree, kids should be kids as long as possible.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Camshaft420

I think you need to look up androgenous. It says nothing about sexual preference. Just about appearing not to be ether or unknown. I think you might have ment asexual.

Exactly.

originally posted by: Dalamax
An argument could be made that sex is for procreation, not recreation.

a reply to: Camshaft420

Nah, not even for animals. Animals have been observed practicing sex with same sex, etc., etc. Sex is a large thing and is not just for procreation.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: Dalamax

I think one could argue that if many did not see it as for recreation, there would be less ones around.

Then again, only 1.5 of the 4 categories are capable of procreation. Without violating their definitions.

It’d be good wouldn’t it.

a reply to: Camshaft420

What about:

- intersexuals
- pansexuals & omnisexuals
- demisexuals
- cupiosexuals
- asexuals
- autosexuals
- gyneasexuals
- androsexuals
- polysexuals
- skoliosexuals
- spectrasexuals

The whole gamut of human sexual expression is rather more varied than in the OP.

- and this is only really covering human-to-human stuff. There's lots more bizarre kinks than that.

a reply to: chr0naut

I looked those up just to be clear of the definitions. They seem to be minor variations of the four listed above or minor variations of others on your list.

I think I read that 75% of everything printed since the printing press was invented has been porn or about sex. I don't think this thread has enough room to discuss it all.

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: DronesandUFOs

Funny how you were the first to being kids into the discussion.

But I do agree, kids should be kids as long as possible.

No.

Kids should be kids until adolescence. Then they become young adults, adults, middle aged, elderly and then geriatric.

Nothing wrong with staying a little "childlike" though, it's the fun part of life.

a reply to: chr0naut

I am not going to Google any of those!

a reply to: chr0naut

spectrasexuals

Stab in the dark, they claim to p@mp ghosts?

a reply to: andy06shake

Or maybe they like to do it wearing specs?

originally posted by: BeyondKnowledge3
a reply to: chr0naut

I looked those up just to be clear of the definitions. They seem to be minor variations of the four listed above or minor variations of others on your list.

I think I read that 75% of everything printed since the printing press was invented has been porn or about sex. I don't think this thread has enough room to discuss it all.

Gutenberg's movable type first printed bibles... that the "porn" you're pretending to know about?.

These lables are used by the people in their own demographic, and if you dont understand other peoples gender or sexual identity means you're not one of us, so dont try hog the narrative.

a reply to: nerbot

I was referring to the sexual aspects of childhood. They should not be forced to grow up that way until they are appropriately curious and then the parents should handle the explanations.

If someone trys to educate a child that is too young to understand, then it only leads to more confusion. This is mostly done by non parents. They think they know better than the parents.

originally posted by: andy06shake
a reply to: chr0naut

spectrasexuals

Stab in the dark, they claim to p@mp ghosts?

Spectrasexual is a term that describes those who are romantically and sexually attracted to multiple sexes, genders, and gender identities but not all of them.

Spectrosexuals do the ghost/poltergeist/succubi thing.