Why did Michael Cohen Need the Secret Service to Deal with a 14yr. Old Boy?

a reply to: JadedGhost

Can you source that fantastic assertion with some fantastic facts to back it up?

Asking for some people reading this.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Why are you lying?

It didn’t come out that Cohen lied. It simply came out that Cohen was pissed off about prank calls he was getting when he contacted Keith Schiller to inform Trump of the pay off.

That’s what’s been established.

CNN
But on Thursday, he got to savor his former fixer-turned-enemy Michael Cohen wobbling on the stand under a fearsome cross-examination. Cohen appeared to be tripped up over an account of a call he’d previously said under oath was to discuss Trump’s hush money payment to adult film Star Stormy Daniels. It emerged under questioning on Thursday that, at least to begin with, the topic of the call was about another matter entirely.🤡

Even cnn can’t polish that cohen turd.

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: JadedGhost

Can you source that fantastic assertion with some fantastic facts to back it up?

Asking for some people reading this.

Can the OP “source that fantastic assertion with some fantastic facts” to back up the claim that it’s been established Cohen lied about informing Trump about the pay off during the interaction?

a reply to: Vermilion

Cool dude, someone on CNN voiced an opinion that you agree with.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: Vermilion

Cool dude, someone on CNN voiced an opinion that you agree with.

To be fair. I always listen to CNN when dealing with Trump trials.

Really explains a lot when he doesn’t get got.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: Vermilion

Cool dude, someone on CNN voiced an opinion that you agree with.

Lol! Source that! OK, here is the source. Waaaaaaaa i don't like that source. Like a small child.

originally posted by: JadedGhost

originally posted by: Justoneman
a reply to: JadedGhost

Can you source that fantastic assertion with some fantastic facts to back it up?

Asking for some people reading this.

Can the OP “source that fantastic assertion with some fantastic facts” to back up the claim that it’s been established Cohen lied about informing Trump about the pay off during the interaction?

Looks like the defense can provide the tapes, So yeah.

You lefties love to miss facts and act like the opposite of it is true.

We are not playing that game.

originally posted by: 5thHead
The title of this thread sounds like the beginning of a joke.

...And, yet, it's serious...DEADLY serious.

originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: CarlLaFong

Why are you lying?

It didn’t come out that Cohen lied. It simply came out that Cohen was pissed off about prank calls he was getting when he contacted Keith Schiller to inform Trump of the pay off.

That’s what’s been established.

BWHAHAHAHA....yeah, sure.

You GO with that.

originally posted by: Vermilion

originally posted by: nugget1
If Cohen knew the kid was 14 it stands to reason he knew who the kid was. I have to wonder why he'd need the SS; wouldn't talking to the kids' parents be the normal, rational thing to do? Like Luminari proffered, maybe there was something nefarious that went on and involved this kid.

Cohen also claims that was the phone call where they discussed the how, whe, why of the hush money payment. It was a 97 second phone call.

I wonder if there will be one impartial juror.

Funny thing is that on the other times when Cohen talked about that specific phone call he never brought up the part about the kid.
Until last week.
Suspect af.
Do you think the prosecutors knew that and decided to roll the dice anyway or were they blindsided by Cohens deception too?

I think the DA/prosecution had the texts but because they were exculpatory...kept them from evidence and the jury.
Remember the 3 pages of phone record evidence Bragg's paralegal admitted to deleting?

This is not just evidence of Cohen lying...but of the prosecution's bias and corruption.

Keep in mind too, The Defense has presented some evidence that The Prosecution never turned over. Hmmm. Some people smell Brady Violations. Remember they exposed that prosecutor para-legal guy who deleted some key records!! 😀

Roaring slap and giggle

Rumors say Stormy Daniels paid the kid to harass Cohen 😃

I can't help but wonder how many other young boys Cohen chats with.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
I think that's the real question here.

During Thursday's Trump trial, under cross examination, it came out that Michael Cohen lied under oath about why he had called Trump's secret service bodyguard, Keith Schiller.

It turns out that Cohen was texting the secret service to help him deal with a 14 yr. old boy whom Cohen said kept crank calling him.
Sure.

WHY would a two-bit, middle-aged, lawyer need to call forth the awesome resources of the US Secret Service in order to deal with a 14 year old boy calling him?
Seriously?

It's very suspicious.
VERY suspicious.

There has to be much more to this than meets the eye.

Here’s the part that apparently hasn’t yet met your eye.

Keith Schiller was never a member of the Secret Service. He was Donald Trump’s personal bodyguard for many years before Trump became POTUS and was given a staff position at the White House when Trump came into office. He was considered one of Trump’s “fixers”. He had no formal role in providing protection to the POTUS.

a reply to: Boomer1947

Thanks.
Clearly, Cohen relied on Schiller to handle his own 14 yr. old boy problem.

originally posted by: GENERAL EYES
I take it ya'll don't hang out on the parts of the interwebz where these teenage sociopathic supergeniuses hang out, otherwise you'd know they probably have dug up every aspect of this mans life, his psychological profile, political faux pas and probably had him reduced to tears crying and sucking his thumb thinking about how no matter how hard he tries, he'll forever be an embarassment to his parents.

Im my own little world, I'd like to think that Secret Service Agent was secretly laughing to himself.

Yeah, you aren't going to win one of those things by engaging. It may very well have been that, but my gut tells me it was just pure arrogance-- something like, (in his mind) -- "That little prick has no idea who I am and how important I am. I'm going to call the SS and show him."

SS was def laughing either way.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong

...And, yet, it's serious...DEADLY serious.

"Life is a flipp'n joke. Do the bungle grind." - Mr. B

It may have taken 8 years...but it looks like Cohen's 14 year old crank caller got the ultimate last laugh after all.

a reply to: Vermilion

Neither can you so where do that end us with?
You and others are wrong.

originally posted by: CarlLaFong
It may have taken 8 years...but it looks like Cohen's 14 year old crank caller got the ultimate last laugh after all.

So now that it fits you will accept evidence brought up by Cohen? If you do that then you m ust accept past issues and rebuttals to arguments made by Cohen.
You cannot have it both ways. If you choose to personally accept that then you m use accept that you don't care about facts and only your own bias.
Hate to be that guy but it m ust be said.