It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
Senator Karim Bianchi, from Chile, telling for the first time he was abducted by a flying saucer in the Chilean Antarctic region, 2012.
originally posted by: ColeYounger2
Reddit discussion:
Alleged Bianchi abduction
The abduction and close encounter cases from South America are crazy. The book 'UFO Danger Zone', written in the 90s, details encounters in Brazil. Physical copies of the book are quite rare, and would probably cost hundreds of dollars.
UFO Danger Zone
2012: “I was on my way from Natales to Punta Arenas. A large rotating light, a saucer, approaches me...my vehicle turned off...I was talking on the phone with someone, everything went off. And then I appeared about 200 kilometers ahead...and then I started to see owls everywhere. A person came and gave me an owl." And the events didn't stop there: "An old bald guy came to my office and brought me some papers. And he told me you have to spread the message. And he brought me some papers that were secret from NASA. He brought them there. And he told me that he was a person of another planet and that, since I had been abducted, he brought me those documents that I still have"
I was told you can tell when politicians lie because their lips are moving.
originally posted by: pianopraze
Guess I’m failing to keep an open mind with this one. I mean, how do you know a politician is lying?
originally posted by: [post=27378709]Arbitrageur[/]I was told you can tell when politicians lie because their lips are moving.
But in general non-politicians who talk about their abduction experiences are not lying, they usually have had a genuine experience, though this doesn't mean they were abducted, it means they believe they were abducted.
originally posted by: pianopraze
originally posted by: ColeYounger2
Reddit discussion:
Alleged Bianchi abduction
The abduction and close encounter cases from South America are crazy. The book 'UFO Danger Zone', written in the 90s, details encounters in Brazil. Physical copies of the book are quite rare, and would probably cost hundreds of dollars.
UFO Danger Zone
TY
The source for that thread is the same twitter post in my Op.
They transcribed and paraphrased a bit more than I did as I wanted to let people decide for themselves without my coloring their view.
2012: “I was on my way from Natales to Punta Arenas. A large rotating light, a saucer, approaches me...my vehicle turned off...I was talking on the phone with someone, everything went off. And then I appeared about 200 kilometers ahead...and then I started to see owls everywhere. A person came and gave me an owl." And the events didn't stop there: "An old bald guy came to my office and brought me some papers. And he told me you have to spread the message. And he brought me some papers that were secret from NASA. He brought them there. And he told me that he was a person of another planet and that, since I had been abducted, he brought me those documents that I still have"
Anytime a politician is speaking I’m suspicious. I’m curious if this will help or hurt him with his demographic. I know there are a lot of believers in South America.
His account seems like something almost textbook iconic… car/phone cutting out, missing time, owls, mysterious men…
I try to be open minded about abductions. I’m sure some are lies, some are Trauma cover.
One of the commenters says he speaks the same language and he is suspicious of this guys body language.
Guess I’m failing to keep an open mind with this one. I mean, how do you know a politician is lying?
originally posted by: Arbitrageur
I was told you can tell when politicians lie because their lips are moving.
originally posted by: pianopraze
Guess I’m failing to keep an open mind with this one. I mean, how do you know a politician is lying?
But in general non-politicians who talk about their abduction experiences are not lying, they usually have had a genuine experience, though this doesn't mean they were abducted, it means they believe they were abducted. A Harvard researcher, Susan Clancy, did a study and wrote a book about this which she talks about here:
snip
originally posted by: NoCorruptionAllowed
I have to chuckle a lot when psychologists and psychiatrists come out with mental mumbo jumbo about how everyone who believes or knows they were abducted, actually weren't.
The school they went to doesn't know about what (to them) are unknown things. Those things don't exist to them because they haven't had the same things happen to them, and they don't teach about it except about how to explain it another way.
So they invent a way that sounds plausible to everyone else who also has never experienced those things, to convince everyone that those things don't actually happen. And that part is true, they don't happen to THEM so it's believable.