It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: RazorV66
originally posted by: Threadbarer
Silence of the Lambs. Has anyone ever seen The Silence of the Lambs? The late, great Hannibal Lecter is a wonderful man. He oftentimes would have a friend for dinner. Remember the last scene? "Excuse me. I'm about to have a friend for dinner," as this poor doctor walked by. "I'm about to have a friend for dinner." But Hannibal Lecter. Congratulations. The late, great Hannibal Lecter...
Wanna explain that part or his comments about President Jimmy Connors.
There's zero chance he wins New Jersey. He lost by 16 points in 2020. There's no way there's going to be a 32 point swing.
Trump should be holding these rallies in states that are actually in play. But that might cut into his golfing time.
That’s a long winded way of saying you are nervous about Trump winning.
Good luck to you weak and fragile clowns when he wins.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
The aerial photos I've seen definitely show a crowd that's nowhere near 100,000. It also sounds like most people left before Trump's speech was finished.
originally posted by: Irishhaf
Oh I get that... but like I said even if you cut the number in half for people that came to actually listen to him, that should spell trouble if blue states are coming into play.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Irishhaf
The aerial photos I've seen definitely show a crowd that's nowhere near 100,000.
originally posted by: Threadbarer
a reply to: Irishhaf
The aerial photos I've seen definitely show a crowd that's nowhere near 100,000. It also sounds like most people left before Trump's speech was finished.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
There is no way that crowd was anywhere near 100,000, not even close..
originally posted by: JadedGhost
There is no way that crowd was anywhere near 100,000, not even close.
Just googled the crowd at the last Super Bowl and apparently that was 61,000 and there was visibly way more people at the Super Bowel than at that Trump rally. 20,000 would probably be far closer to the real number, then you have to include the few thousand die hard supporters who follow Trump around the country when he does a rally.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: JadedGhost
There is no way that crowd was anywhere near 100,000, not even close..
The City of Wildwood says 80,000 - 100,000.
They have the people trained in counting crowds.
They have the equipment in place to count crowds.
They have the experience of counting crowds in Wildwood.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: JadedGhost
There is no way that crowd was anywhere near 100,000, not even close..
The City of Wildwood says 80,000 - 100,000.
They have the people trained in counting crowds.
They have the equipment in place to count crowds.
They have the experience of counting crowds in Wildwood.
lol, they have an official crowd counting team do they?
Look, you don’t even have to take my word for it. Just google images of any major sporting event, then compare them to images of that rally… you’ll be able to see for yourself the numbers their claiming are majorly exaggerated.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
lol, they have an official crowd counting team do they?
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: YourFaceAgain
Yeah ok, if it makes you feel better then 100,000 people rocked up to listen to Trump ramble on about the silence of the lambs.
The images clearly show it’s not true, but whatever helps you sleep at night.
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: YourFaceAgain
Yeah ok, if it makes you feel better then 100,000 people rocked up to listen to Trump ramble on about the silence of the lambs.
The images clearly show it’s not true, but whatever helps you sleep at night.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: YourFaceAgain
Yeah ok, if it makes you feel better then 100,000 people rocked up to listen to Trump ramble on about the silence of the lambs.
The images clearly show it’s not true, but whatever helps you sleep at night.
Crowd size def made the news.
In a very questionable manner.
originally posted by: Annee
Crowd size def made the news.
In a very questionable manner.
originally posted by: FlyersFan
originally posted by: Annee
Crowd size def made the news.
In a very questionable manner.
There was nothing 'very questionable' about it.
The City of Wildwood estimated the crowd size at 100,000.
They have experience with estimating crowd sizes for their venues.
It's a tourist city with lots of events.
Like I said ... nothing questionable about it.
originally posted by: Annee
originally posted by: JadedGhost
a reply to: YourFaceAgain
Yeah ok, if it makes you feel better then 100,000 people rocked up to listen to Trump ramble on about the silence of the lambs.
The images clearly show it’s not true, but whatever helps you sleep at night.
Crowd size def made the news.
In a very questionable manner.