posted on May, 7 2024 @ 05:36 PM
All this talk of entering a countdown will remind older hands of the exciting days more than a decade back, when we were heading towards the
significant event of 21/12/2012. “But nothing happened on December the twenty-first 2012”. “Yes, that was the significant event”.
It’s worth remembering those days in order to bring additional perspective into the “What caused the decline of ATS?” argument. There is a case
that the fiasco of December 2012 was an important long-term factor.
In those days, as we all remember, “mysterious stuff” was an important element in ATS discussions. But in 2012 nearly everybody who was interested
in “mysterious stuff” was investing heavily into the drama of something big happening at the end of the year. When the big day finally arrived, we
did not see the end of the age, but we surely saw the end of “New Age”. Once those hopes had been disappointed, those who had been fascinated by
“mysterious stuff” began to lose interest and stop posting.
That is the implication of the gradual reduction in posting levels which began almost immediately in 2013. I can offer you two pieces of evidence
(though, sadly, they depend on my memory).
Firstly, the “number of new topics per week” statistic. In those days I had already begun the routine of regular Friday night threads, so I
observed this statistic indirectly, by noticing the interval between the weekly thread numbers. For example, my first two threads on Revelation, a
week apart, had thread numbers ending in 60068 and 62314. That’s a number interval of more than 2000. But from 2013 onwards, the intervals were
gradually dropping. The numbers of my first two threads on 1 Corinthians (September 2013) were 71068 and 72526. The number of new threads per week had
already dropped by a quarter. A few years later, I could make the complacent calculation that my weekly threads were now 0.1 percent of the new thread
content of ATS. That is, less than a thousand a week. Later on, the drop in weekly new topics must have become an embarrassment, because the statistic
disappeared from the forum page, though it can still be guessed from the number of “new topics today”.
The other clue is harder to measure. I refer to the time taken for a new thread to drop from the top to the bottom of the first page in Recent Posts,
if nobody responded. During my first ATS years, this time was longer in the GMT morning, when things were slow. During the afternoon, there was a
noticeable increase in speed at the time when the Americans would be starting to wake up, and a neglected thread would be positively racing to the
bottom in the evening. That is, a lot more people were coming online and posting new threads or replying to existing ones. I had an interest in this
phenomenon as a poster of potentially neglected threads. Was it better to post during the slow period, when they would be visible onscreen for a
longer time, or during the fast period when they were visible more briefly but seen by more people while they were there? But six months into 2013 it
was already evident that the daily increase in speed was no longer happening, to anything like the same extent. The implication was that people were
coming online and being active in much fewer numbers.
I think this disposes of the story that “mysterious stuff” has been pushed out by politics. The case is rather that “mysterious stuff” was
already pulling out, in the sense that fewer people were coming forward to write about it, and politics merely expanded to take its place. In fact it
did not really need to expand. Once other fields of interest were disappearing, the “politics” field of interest automatically became a larger
proportion of whatever was left.
One more question. It seems possible that this time the countdown really will reach a climax. ATS might go to sleep, and we might wake up in another
location, like the one mentioned in DTOM’s signature.
Would that count as Ascension?