HORRIBLE !! Russian Soldier Drinking Own Urine To Survive In Battle

a reply to: TheMisguidedAngel

Just no

originally posted by: Freeborn
a reply to: TheMisguidedAngel

AND had the US not supplied all the weapons the death toll would have been 2% of those on both sides and would have been long over......

And Russian forces would now be in complete control of Ukraine and Putin would be eying up his next conquest - Baltic States, Moldova, Poland?

Would you be happy with that?

Well historically speaking, I would say the Ukraine, just like Maryland is always going to be in the US. Ukraine should always be Russia. The Russ started in Kiev. The whole region expanded from there to the Pacific and the West. Viking lords that are shown in the History channels dramatic Viking series united when Ibar the boneless was young and went to Kiev. The European nations that were trapped behind the Iron Curtain will not be taken back IMO. They were a buffer like the Ocean is for us here. Putin may be fighting child trafficking blood sucking evil too when we finally get to the root of the problem.

a reply to: budzprime69

You do realize none of this would have ever happened if the US state dept and CIA hadn't been pushing the color revolution in 2014 right? Guess who picked all the Ukrainians who got to run for office...and more than likely had a hand in making sure "the right ones" got elected...the US mostly with help from other partner nations. Free and fair I am sure...

"Then Putin would be taking over the world".

Why wait till then to find out?

a reply to: TheMisguidedAngel

a reply to: RickyD

I believe the citizens of Ukraine may be of a different opinion.
Did the West help push them towards a more economically prosperous future? Yes they did.
European Union–Ukraine Association Agreement was a huge step in the right direction that would have helped create oh so jobs and much much more. But no that did not happen. Last minute Yanukovych pulled out of I therefore setting back by many years of progress to get to that next step.
Then Yanukovych fled to his buddy Putin in the middle of the night.....oh and stealing priceless works of art and who knows what else.

I strongly feel that many here just either forget history or are just ignorant to it. Maybe one of these days WE can figure that out.

a reply to: diaclonethunder

I'm not part of the grammar police.....but reading your post was painful, it made my eyes bleed.

originally posted by: KnowItAllKnowNothin
a reply to: DISBOLD

A lot of folks drink some of their own urine, and some even loop-it ( Drink all of it. )

Dortorish Amandha Vollmer, Allegedly Dave, astronaut trainees, and most serious survivalists.

Old tradesmen used to pee on their hands every day or two, to help the healing and cracking.

In Japan they collect pee from the bathrooms, and make medicine with it.

If you've ever used a cream with urea, well, that's made from pee.

It doesn't tase good, but it's not the end of the world.

Drink-up !

And once I saw this group of men and a couple women, well they were more like teenagers and they were fighting the Russians 🇷🇺 because the Russians invaded this town in Colorado and the Russians 🇷🇺 came down in parachutes and the teenagers jumped into this cool 4X4 truck and filled it with guns and food and supplies and they headed to the mountains and the Russians 🇷🇺 almost killed them with missiles from helicopters, but they lived but the truck started having problems and it was over heating so the teenager bullies grabbed the smallest, youngest teenager and they made him PEE INTO THE RADIATOR and it fixed the truck 👌👏🤘


SO Urine is excellent in a survival situation. I will never forget you can PEE in Radiator if you have no water

a reply to: budzprime69

No...you are just trying to gloss over the absolute fact that victoria nuland got caught doing exactly what I said they did. There were a whole lot of Ukrainians that did not want to be in NATO or closer to the west. Do you forget the Maiden Riots...and all the cases of far right groups which we backed to over throw the government going into the Donbass and slaughtering civilians?!?! The people who were there haven't forgotten...nor has Russia. And even after all that Russia still went at it with kid gloves on...and even still they are not going full tilt. If they did Kiev would be glassed by arty and missile strikes...

I feel like you are being either deceptive or ignorant...

a reply to: RickyD

I gave you the situation that they as a country faced. That prospect was stripped away by a pro Putin schmuck. Hence why he fled instead if being a leader of the people.
Also need I remind you that Ukraine did not invade Russia. Exactly what part of that do you not understand?
You can attempt to spread your anti west propaganda all you want but facts about the situation are as is.
You should learn to live in reality instead of victim blaming Ukraine for putin transgressions.

originally posted by: Degradation33
a reply to: DISBOLD

I don't mean to be a total heartless bitch, but maybe Putin shouldn't have invaded a country because they didn't want to be Russia's puppet state? And more Russians than Navalny could grow the intestinal fortitude that stand up to their Vietnam. But are too afraid.

Shows the difference in standard of Freedom.

Maybe you should get the facts correct before you start talking.

Ukraine started shelling the population of the Donbas region in Ukraine. Shelling thier own countrymen. Who were these countrymen who were living there? They are majority of Russian decent. Thousands of shells a day. If Zelensky wasn't trying to exterminate the people living in his own country in those regions, who were of Russian descent, then Putin wouldn't have had to intervene, to send troops to protect those people. If he didn't those people would have been wiped out.

Instead of believing all the propaganda on the TV, how about you do your own research and look it up. Find the reports that I found that show the amount of shells fired in that region, before the Russian invasion of those regions....

Zelensky started this. Ukraine is a puppet state of the USA now. Especially since the CIA overthrew the Ukraine government in 2014 after the democratically held elections didn't sway the way they wanted, when the people of Ukraine voted for a candidate who was pro-russian.

a reply to: DaRAGE

Ahh you talking about the paid russian separatist implanted to sew decent using family members divided from the fall of the USSR.
Yes and thank you for the history lesson.
Aside from the fact that the orange revolution shows how incorrect you are.
History is friend, now go learn it.
Some people are so focused on the now that they forget or ignore the setting that was layer out before the now.
And you sir are a direct result of that.

a reply to: budzprime69

Yeah I wasn't really focused on the talking point about the cia overthrow in 2014.
The orange revolution... That large amount of protests in 2004 - 2005 regarding political corruption and voting, etc.

I was mainly talking about the reason for the Russia Ukraine war that's still on going and the reasons why Russia went in.
People like to say abuse at Russia in regards to this "invasion".
They cry out, "Russia invaded Ukraine, what arseholes!!"

They fail to mention the actual fact as to WHY Russia invaded Ukraine. Which was Ukraine trying to murder the residents of the Donbas region and surrounding regions where Russia invaded. the residents who are of majority Russian descent. It's called ethnic cleansing.

Following the work of Lemkin, the United Nations Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in 1951 defined genocide as ANY of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such (2):

A. Killing members of the group;

B. Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;

C. Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part;

D. Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;

E. Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.

I guess we can call it genocide.

If a member of the United Nations Security Council witnesses a country engaging in ethnic cleansing, they are obligated to bring the matter to the attention of the Security Council and push for action to stop the atrocities. However, direct military intervention by an individual member state without authorization from the Security Council would generally be considered a violation of international law.

Here are the key points to understand:

1. The UN Security Council is responsible for maintaining international peace and security. Its primary role is to identify threats and authorize collective action.

2. Under the UN Charter, the use of force by member states is prohibited unless it is in self-defense or authorized by the Security Council. Unilateral intervention without UNSC approval, even for humanitarian reasons, is legally questionable.

3. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, endorsed by the UN in 2005, states that the international community has a responsibility to intervene when a state fails to protect its population from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. However, R2P still requires Security Council authorization for military action.

4. In practice, political considerations and the veto power of the five permanent members (US, UK, France, Russia, China) often hamper the Security Council's ability to respond decisively to atrocities.

5. In extreme cases where the UNSC fails to act, some argue that unauthorized humanitarian intervention may be morally justified, but it remains legally controversial.

So in summary, while a Security Council member has a strong moral duty to raise the alarm and push for collective action to halt ethnic cleansing, international law does not permit them to unilaterally intervene militarily without UNSC authorization, barring exceptional circumstances. The situation highlights the ongoing tensions and debates around humanitarian intervention, state sovereignty, and the international legal order.

Lets look at #3. Responsibility to protect...

3. The Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine, endorsed by the UN in 2005, states that the international community has a responsibility to intervene when a state fails to protect its population from genocide, war crimes, ethnic cleansing, and crimes against humanity. However, R2P still requires Security Council authorization for military action.

The state of Ukraine (puppet state of America) was failing to protect its population from genocide (ethnic cleansing) people of Russian descent living in it's Donbas region, as it WAS the one committing genocide (ethnic cleansing).


The U. N is useless. What could it do in this situation?
Lets look at number 4.

4. In practice, political considerations and the veto power of the five permanent members (US, UK, France, Russia, China) often hamper the Security Council's ability to respond decisively to atrocities.

Look at the five permanent members. UK, US, France, Russian, China. The UK would Veto, US Veto, France Veto, China probably not but maybe.

So Russian went in to save these people.

a reply to: DaRAGE

What facts could ever begin with "Zelensky started it?" Is that because he got elected with a pro NATO position?

Got any sour milk to test while we are at it?

Consider me firmly entrapped by Western Propaganda and the lies of Nadya Tolokonnikova. Totally. Not even worth trying to convince me otherwise, really.

a reply to: DaRAGE

They fail to mention the actual fact as to WHY Russia invaded Ukraine. Which was Ukraine trying to murder the residents of the Donbas region and surrounding regions where Russia invaded. the residents who are of majority Russian descent. It's called ethnic cleansing.

Are you for real? It was an armed insurrection organized by the paramilitary separatist forces who stormed the local government buildings. There were casualties on both sides. The Ukrainians were being killed too. So defending the country's territorial integrity against fully armed separatists financed by another state is ethnic cleansing for you? Interesting.

I see you hail from Australia. You must wholeheartedly support the independence of the Western Australia. Since a peaceful referendum didn't help, perhaps it's time for some little insurgency eh? I guess you wouldn't mind a full Aboriginal revolt either. All we need is to provide them with weapons perhaps so that they can have their revenge for all this ethnic cleansing throughout centuries. What say you?

originally posted by: budzprime69
a reply to: DaRAGE

Ahh you talking about the paid russian separatist implanted to sew decent using family members divided from the fall of the USSR.
Yes and thank you for the history lesson.
Aside from the fact that the orange revolution shows how incorrect you are.
History is friend, now go learn it.
Some people are so focused on the now that they forget or ignore the setting that was layer out before the now.
And you sir are a direct result of that.

Seriously watch the Western News report from 2014 from Eastern Ukraine at the link below. You think these are all "paid Russian separatists"?

Listen to the teenager "our government is killing us"
LISTEN to the older woman "we will not live under a fascist (Ukrainian) government.

LISTEN TO the well known British reporter "its hard to tell any of these young people living in Eastern Ukraine that they have any kind of future under the Ukrainian government"


twitter.com...

originally posted by: TheMisguidedAngel
AND had the US not supplied all the weapons the death toll would have been 2% of those on both sides and would have been long over and a distant memory but alas the US continues to send more weapons, ammunition and $$ so the death toll will Continue rising on both sides

Don't go blaming the USA for the death toll over there. This is ALL on Putin and the Russians invading Ukraine. No one would be dead if he hadn't done that. The USA and Europe are giving Ukraine a fighting chance not to be gobbled up by Russian expansionism. Blaming the deaths on the people who are fighting for their lives ... that's pretty bad.

for those that say it wasn't russia who started this war back in 2014 look up a man named, igor girkin aliasly known as igor ivanovich strelkov, a former fsb agent who led russian forces in crimea, and admitted starting the war in Donbas.

he's a known war hawk and is now in prison for calling ol farty a cowardly buffon and turning against him. so yeah he was a paid russian agent, who won't make it out of the gulag alive.

Girkin admitted responsibility for sparking the Donbas War in eastern Ukraine when, in April 2014, he led a group of armed Russian militants who seized Sloviansk.[5] His role in the siege gained him influence and attention, and he was appointed to the position of Minister of Defense in the Donetsk People's Republic, a puppet state of Russia.[4][6] Girkin was charged with terrorism by Ukrainian authorities.[7] He has also been sanctioned by the European Union, United States, United Kingdom, Australia, Japan, Canada and Switzerland for his leading role in the war in eastern Ukraine.[8][9]

Igor Girkin

The war in Donbas,[c] or Donbas war, was a phase of the Russo-Ukrainian War in the Donbas region of Ukraine. The war began 12 April 2014, when a fifty-man commando unit headed by Russian citizen Igor Girkin seized Sloviansk in Donetsk oblast.[20][21][22][23] The Ukrainian military launched an operation against them.[24][25] It continued until it was subsumed by the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.[26][full citation needed]

War in Donbas

Girkin, who is also known by his nom de guerre Igor Strelkov, is an ex-officer of the Federal Security Service, or FSB. He played a role in Russia’s invasion and annexation of Crimea in 2014 and then served as a commander in Russian-controlled areas of Donbas in eastern Ukraine, where he helped foment a separatist war and was accused of extrajudicial killings.

Russia arrests Igor Girkin, ex-security officer who led operations in Ukraine

I wonder who the director is of these so called revelation videos. Please go and read all the literature about combat cameramen and the main thing that will smack you in the face is it is very rare to be in the right place at the right time. These videos are just too perfect, just at the right time, nice stable filming platform with excellent zoom in.

Russian killed numbers:-
Newsweek:-341,5000
Reuters:-315,000
Zelenski figures:- 180,000
Believe who you want.