It looks like you're using an Ad Blocker.
Please white-list or disable AboveTopSecret.com in your ad-blocking tool.
Thank you.
Some features of ATS will be disabled while you continue to use an ad-blocker.
originally posted by: Justoneman
I have been analyzing atmospheric chemicals since the 80's. Real is real for me. Not sure what real ever means to those who wish to be elusive and might be pushing narratives.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Starred by me for the pure laugh quality. CO2 was super high compared to today like way over 1000 ppb.
originally posted by: Justoneman
Great question in fact. I suspect yes.
If it rains too much, or there is a drought they say global warming,
If it is cold, or it still snows when the prediction was never again, they say global warming.
We can't have it both ways, but they will try.
originally posted by: leongrad
a reply to: BrucellaOrchitis
I don't think we're asking the correct questions.
The question I would like governments to answer is, is cloud seeding used as a tool to manufacture fake evidences in favor of global warming?
They now have the technology to create heavy rainfall at one point on Earth and a subsequent lack of rain at another point of Earth. The US government says that it cannot be held liable for damages caused by its weather modifications activities.
Don't you feel there's some questions worth exploring on that topic? When will we begin drawing a line between harmless experiments and downright ecoterrorism?